Pelosi: I’m Satisfied with Biden’s Response. Reporter: Biden Hasn’t Responded

[Bobob]

Well, if there are records of her being moved from her position when she said she was moved, and further details that back up her story, Bidens silence will be interpreted accordingly.

Right or wrong, this is how politics has become and those who wanted to destroy another simply for power may face the same standard. Whether they believe they will or not. This is what Biden and his party is going to have to come to terms with.

There is nothing in the record to back up her claims. She claims to have reported the incident to the ethics committee but she kept no copy of her report, although she has a copy of her employment file. She claims her mother called Larry King, but has no evidence to back that up either. There are no witnessed she told about this at the time it happened. Only years later did she tell this story to her neighbour.

And she has yet to file for or request an investigation, swear an affidavit (which could subject her to perjury charges, if she's lying) or even take a lie detector test. Nothing to reinforce or support an allegation she made via FaceBook post.

I'm sure MSNBC and CNN aren't playing the actual video of her mother's call so I'm sure you haven't seen it.

Oh, wait. CNN did play it. So you have seen it. You just deny it.

I assume you're not really a woman because how could a woman support a rapist for president? If you're really female, you're certainly not a supporter of woman's rights or a defender of their body, their choice. No matter what you otherwise are or are not, you certainly care more about socialism or are so consumed with TDS that you'll accept any abuse of a woman in order to see your true goals met.

I didn't support Donald Trump for President and he's the only man who has been credibly accused of rape, by multiple women, including his ex-wife who has steadfastly refused to recant her sworn statement that he beat and raper her and has simply said it "wasn't his best moment".

Don't even start on Bill Clinton. Bill was or maybe still is, a hound dog, but none of his accusers said he raped them. All were more than willing and when Bill made his move, if they said "No", the very strong evidence is that he stopped. Paula Jones never accused Bill of rape. She said her career suffered after she said "No". There was no evidence that this was the case and the case was dismissed with prejudice. Jones hereself had only initially asked for an apology for a magazinen article. It was Republicans who manufactured the whole "sexual harassment case".

Ken Starr extorted an accusation of rape from Anita Broaddrick, by threatening to charge her with perjury and throw her in jail, just like he did Susan McDougall, if Broaddrick didn't recant her sworn affidavit that Bill Clinton did not rape her, in the Paula Jones case.

More than 20 women have come forward and said that Donald Trump groped, grabbed, and physically assaulted them. When they resisted, he used his size and his weight to push his advances. Their stories are eerily similar. Three have said that he raped them. Violently. One of them said it happened at Jeffrey Epstein's apartment when she was 13. She had an affidavit from an eye witness.

Their stories matched Donald Trump bragging to an Access Hollywood reporter on a live mike, that he did whatever he wanted with women because he's a star. "I don't even ask."

Throughout his time in office we have seen him anti-women, anti-family policies that have had such negative impact on women's lives. Trum allowed the "Violence Against Women Act", which Joe Biden wrote and helped pass and which has save thousands of lives, to lapse.

Trump's healthcare plan would allow insurance companies to include "pregnancy" and "rape" to be included as "pre-existing conditions" so that insurance companies could charge any woman who has had a baby, a higher health insurance premium. This is because there wasn't one woman on the Republican Senate Committee with authored the Bill. Furthermore, the Trump Administration is backing a Supreme Court Challenge by right wing religious employers to allow them to exclude women's reproductive health care and birth control from employer based insurance policies, on religious grounds. If health insurance is part of employer compensation, then employees should have the right of deciding what's their compensation includes, but we'll see how this turns out.

Even if the allegations against Biden did turn out to be true, it's a contest between two rapists. I'll pick the rapist who wrote the Violence Against Women Act over the guy who is still trying to kill abortion rights for women, birth control in healthcare for women, who doesn't any women in high positions in his government except his daughter, and she's as useless as teats on a bull.

Says it all.

 

[Bobob]

The Left lie lie lie.

Biden said that nothing happened with that woman, just as Trump said that nothing happened with those 25 women.
Are they both lying? 25 women.

We are talking about the hypocritical meetooo movement. They demanded Ford be heard with absolutely no evidence and totally ignores Reade's accusation with a little bit of evidence.

Ford was completely different. She spent years in therapy for whatever happened. She knew Judge and Kavanaugh were together. Kavanaugh's calendar confirmed that. She told a consistent story. Even Trump had to admit she sounded credible.

Reade has told 2 different stories. Claimed to talk with Biden's office about it and they are saying it did not happen. She told her story after Biden became the nominee. She was a Sanders supporter. Gave another story about her supposedly7 being fired.

She would need therapy no matte what cuz she is a loon. How would Kavanaugh's calendar confirm he and Judge were together when the loon doesn't even know what month is supposedly happened?

30 years later that could easily happen.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Now that Crazy Joe has finally responded with "I don't remember, but it never happened", I wonder if Nazi Pelousy is still happy with his response.

Did he really say that, or are you just being silly?

 

[ColonelAngus]

The Left lie lie lie.

Biden said that nothing happened with that woman, just as Trump said that nothing happened with those 25 women.
Are they both lying? 25 women.

Biden has said nothing about the accusations because he knows the jig is up.

Biden's silence is an admission of GUILT! Fox News is having a field day with his silence to the point the liberal media are now starting to ask Dems questions. Pelosi was asked today and threw a conniption fit.

What would be Meade’s motivation for lying? She is a lifelong Democrat who voted for HIllary Clinton.

The Dems are panicking. Their hypocrisy is really showing.

No, it is your hypocrisy that is showing. If Trump's admission and sexual abuse don't matter, why should Biden's
stuff matter so much to you?

It’s Biden versus Kavanaugh, you fool.

I don’t think any of it should matter.

But the left did with Kavanaugh.

I am consistent. None of the 30 year old allegations matter.

Understand? Biden should not be removed from running for POTUS from an allegation from 1993. Kavanaugh shouldn’t have been prevented from getting on SCOTUS for an allegation from 1985.

Are you consistent?

True, and I didn't like Kavanaugh for other reasons, one being that he owes Trump.

I have not been a fan of some of Kavanaugh’s recent decisions.

Just as I am not a fan of Roberts. Roberts is why we have Obamacare. He is feckless.

 

[Bobob]

Maybe the two of them had an ice cream social last night.....because Biden hasn't said crap about it to any of us....

And, being a loyal Trumpanzee, what would be your response, regardless of what Vice President Biden says?

Biden is a deceitful indecent man....his family have enriched themselves using Joe's position as a senator and the VP....his brother and both sons as well as other family have gotten stinky rich without working....all of this will be more damaging than this latest accusation from this woman....

Trump's kids have made millions off the presidency in a few short years, yes? Should this hurt Trump? Remember that we are comparing Biden to Trump, a known grifter and admitted sex offender.

 

[basquebromance]

you can be either a metoo feminist or a Joe Biden apologist...but you cant be both!

 

[Nostra]

Now that Crazy Joe has finally responded with "I don't remember, but it never happened", I wonder if Nazi Pelousy is still happy with his response.

Did he really say that, or are you just being silly?

Not in the same sentence, but within minutes during his Mika interview.

 

[Faun]

The Left lie lie lie.

Dayum, con, you sure are obsessed with this. Look at all the threads you're spawning just to feed your obsession...

• Biden Camp Refuses To Open Up Senate Papers But Has Sent Operatives To Search Records
• MSNC’s Chris Hayes Mentions Tara Reade, #FireChrisHayes Trends on Twitter
• 19 Straight Interviews of Biden and Not One Question About Rape Accusation
• Pelosi: I’m Satisfied with Biden’s Response. Reporter: Biden Hasn’t Responded
• Crazy Uncle Joe Facing a Mutiny Now
• Judge Dismisses Sexual Assault Allegations Against Biden On Grounds That He Is Not A Republican
• Hillary to Sexual Assault Victims: "You Have The Right To Be Heard, You Have The Right To Be Believed"
• Pelosi’s Tweets on Kavanaugh Get Updated

Um..........someone is obsessed.

Yes he is.

 

[Bobob]

The Left lie lie lie.

Biden said that nothing happened with that woman, just as Trump said that nothing happened with those 25 women.
Are they both lying? 25 women.

Where did Biden say that? I have yet to see anyone ask him about it.

I forget where I saw it, but regardless, he would deny it.

So he has yet to address his rape.

So nothing. I read somewhere (do not recall where) that Biden denied it. And it is an accusation of sexual malfeasance,
not an accusation of rape. So let's not drool yet, yes?

It's sexual assault. And you know damn well he did it.

Actually, it's rape.

(a)Rape.—Any person subject to this chapter who commits a sexual act upon another person by—
(1)
using unlawful force against that other person;

Her claim is that he forced her against the wall and penetrated her vulva with his finger.

Physical force + sexual act = RAPE.

Of course, the incident has evolved into that but was originally put forth in a 'kinder, gentler' manner.

 

[two_iron]

Nanzi has been graded on the drunk fucktard curve for decades now... and that politburo fluffer is just shocked that she can't get a coherent answer out of her..... yeah, you created that, stupid.

 

[Bobob]

Nanzi has been graded on the drunk fucktard curve for decades now... and that politburo fluffer is just shocked that she can't get a coherent answer out of her..... yeah, you created that, stupid.

And the virus known as Trump is in the saddle instead. Big deal

 

[Levant]

True, and I didn't like Kavanaugh for other reasons, one being that he owes Trump.

He sure isn't ruling like he owes Trump. He's as far left as anyone on the court.

 

[Levant]

Well, if there are records of her being moved from her position when she said she was moved, and further details that back up her story, Bidens silence will be interpreted accordingly.

Right or wrong, this is how politics has become and those who wanted to destroy another simply for power may face the same standard. Whether they believe they will or not. This is what Biden and his party is going to have to come to terms with.

There is nothing in the record to back up her claims. She claims to have reported the incident to the ethics committee but she kept no copy of her report, although she has a copy of her employment file. She claims her mother called Larry King, but has no evidence to back that up either. There are no witnessed she told about this at the time it happened. Only years later did she tell this story to her neighbour.

And she has yet to file for or request an investigation, swear an affidavit (which could subject her to perjury charges, if she's lying) or even take a lie detector test. Nothing to reinforce or support an allegation she made via FaceBook post.

I'm sure MSNBC and CNN aren't playing the actual video of her mother's call so I'm sure you haven't seen it.

Oh, wait. CNN did play it. So you have seen it. You just deny it.

I assume you're not really a woman because how could a woman support a rapist for president? If you're really female, you're certainly not a supporter of woman's rights or a defender of their body, their choice. No matter what you otherwise are or are not, you certainly care more about socialism or are so consumed with TDS that you'll accept any abuse of a woman in order to see your true goals met.

I didn't support Donald Trump for President and he's the only man who has been credibly accused of rape, by multiple women, including his ex-wife who has steadfastly refused to recant her sworn statement that he beat and raper her and has simply said it "wasn't his best moment".

Don't even start on Bill Clinton. Bill was or maybe still is, a hound dog, but none of his accusers said he raped them. All were more than willing and when Bill made his move, if they said "No", the very strong evidence is that he stopped. Paula Jones never accused Bill of rape. She said her career suffered after she said "No". There was no evidence that this was the case and the case was dismissed with prejudice. Jones hereself had only initially asked for an apology for a magazinen article. It was Republicans who manufactured the whole "sexual harassment case".

Ken Starr extorted an accusation of rape from Anita Broaddrick, by threatening to charge her with perjury and throw her in jail, just like he did Susan McDougall, if Broaddrick didn't recant her sworn affidavit that Bill Clinton did not rape her, in the Paula Jones case.

More than 20 women have come forward and said that Donald Trump groped, grabbed, and physically assaulted them. When they resisted, he used his size and his weight to push his advances. Their stories are eerily similar. Three have said that he raped them. Violently. One of them said it happened at Jeffrey Epstein's apartment when she was 13. She had an affidavit from an eye witness.

Their stories matched Donald Trump bragging to an Access Hollywood reporter on a live mike, that he did whatever he wanted with women because he's a star. "I don't even ask."

Throughout his time in office we have seen him anti-women, anti-family policies that have had such negative impact on women's lives. Trum allowed the "Violence Against Women Act", which Joe Biden wrote and helped pass and which has save thousands of lives, to lapse.

Trump's healthcare plan would allow insurance companies to include "pregnancy" and "rape" to be included as "pre-existing conditions" so that insurance companies could charge any woman who has had a baby, a higher health insurance premium. This is because there wasn't one woman on the Republican Senate Committee with authored the Bill. Furthermore, the Trump Administration is backing a Supreme Court Challenge by right wing religious employers to allow them to exclude women's reproductive health care and birth control from employer based insurance policies, on religious grounds. If health insurance is part of employer compensation, then employees should have the right of deciding what's their compensation includes, but we'll see how this turns out.

Even if the allegations against Biden did turn out to be true, it's a contest between two rapists. I'll pick the rapist who wrote the Violence Against Women Act over the guy who is still trying to kill abortion rights for women, birth control in healthcare for women, who doesn't any women in high positions in his government except his daughter, and she's as useless as teats on a bull.

No doubt there are questions about Trump's past.... You should start a different thread. This one's about Biden.

As long as you admit Biden is a rapist - and you almost did - and that you're choosing the lesser, in your opinion, rapist, I have to respect that. Thank you. It may really come down to that for a lot on the left.

 

[Bobob]

True, and I didn't like Kavanaugh for other reasons, one being that he owes Trump.

He sure isn't ruling like he owes Trump. He's as far left as anyone on the court.

Really? How? I would prefer a moderate and that is good, if so.

 

[Levant]

True, and I didn't like Kavanaugh for other reasons, one being that he owes Trump.

He sure isn't ruling like he owes Trump. He's as far left as anyone on the court.

Really? How? I would prefer a moderate and that is good, if so.

I would prefer someone who follows original intent of the Constitution and that leaves politics out of it.

 

[hadit]

The Left lie lie lie.

Biden said that nothing happened with that woman, just as Trump said that nothing happened with those 25 women.
Are they both lying? 25 women.

Biden has said nothing about the accusations because he knows the jig is up.

Biden's silence is an admission of GUILT! Fox News is having a field day with his silence to the point the liberal media are now starting to ask Dems questions. Pelosi was asked today and threw a conniption fit.

Trump News has no problem with a dozen or so women who have claimed that Trump sexually assaulted them. Apparently that is okay. Trump News is fake news.

But, but, but, TRUMP! Dogged determination to always at all cost shift the narrative to Trump rears its head once again. Clearly, the marching orders have gone out. Is it just too difficult to defend Biden on his own merits?

Not difficult, but unnecessary. We know that Trump is not guilty since he said they were all liars--all 25 of 'em.
On, he admitted to sexual impropriety and that doesn't matter to his followers either. So if Trump's stuff doesn't matter, why should Biden's stuff?

You're getting a little closer, but still not making the case for Biden on its own merits. If there's no need to defend Biden, why the shrieking about Trump every time someone criticizes him? If his groping doesn't matter, just say so and move on. As it is, every deflection onto Trump just solidifies Biden's image as a sexual predator, and that's not doing him any favors.

I am speaking about pundits. I want to know why trump followers are so determined. Let it go the way you let the Trump accusations go. If you are going to put so much emphasis on Biden, then do the same for Trump. There is no
way that proof will emerge after 30 years for either of them. One can be wrong, but 25? Nah.

Trump's accusers had their day in the spotlight. This is Biden's turn. Let his situation stand on its own. As it is, this insistence that Trump be brought into it merely reinforces his apparent guilt.

 

[Bobob]

True, and I didn't like Kavanaugh for other reasons, one being that he owes Trump.

He sure isn't ruling like he owes Trump. He's as far left as anyone on the court.

Really? How? I would prefer a moderate and that is good, if so.

I would prefer someone who follows original intent of the Constitution and that leaves politics out of it.

In my view, a moderate doesn't let politics interfere with his/her decisions.

 

[Levant]

True, and I didn't like Kavanaugh for other reasons, one being that he owes Trump.

He sure isn't ruling like he owes Trump. He's as far left as anyone on the court.

Really? How? I would prefer a moderate and that is good, if so.

I would prefer someone who follows original intent of the Constitution and that leaves politics out of it.

In my view, a moderate doesn't let politics interfere with his/her decisions.

Could be; it's one way to define it. I find more people who claim to be moderates, though, claim that being in the middle is what makes them moderate. To me, there should be no middle, no left, no right. There's the Constitution and the unconstitutional. That's it.

Well, there are a lot of variations on constitutional that could actually be constitutional. For instance, states could have welfare - I'd be against it just as I am on the Federal level - if their constitutions didn't forbid it. For the Federal Government to have welfare, on the other hand, is clearly not constitutional. So there's room for differences of opinion on what government should or should not do, but no room for difference on what government can constitutionally do.

 

[Bobob]

True, and I didn't like Kavanaugh for other reasons, one being that he owes Trump.

He sure isn't ruling like he owes Trump. He's as far left as anyone on the court.

Really? How? I would prefer a moderate and that is good, if so.

I would prefer someone who follows original intent of the Constitution and that leaves politics out of it.

In my view, a moderate doesn't let politics interfere with his/her decisions.

Could be; it's one way to define it. I find more people who claim to be moderates, though, claim that being in the middle is what makes them moderate. To me, there should be no middle, no left, no right. There's the Constitution and the unconstitutional. That's it.

Well, there are a lot of variations on constitutional that could actually be constitutional. For instance, states could have welfare - I'd be against it just as I am on the Federal level - if their constitutions didn't forbid it. For the Federal Government to have welfare, on the other hand, is clearly not constitutional. So there's room for differences of opinion on what government should or should not do, but no room for difference on what government can constitutionally do.

The Constitution is interpreted differently by different pundits and the Constitution was written during a different
time in our history. That is why I favor a moderate who uses the document as a guide and not as something etched in stone.

 

[MeBelle]

Oh? It was your pussy he fingered?

shameful