Pelosi-Hammerer Criminal Complaint Released

I found the SPECIAL AGENT’S affidavit interesting and informative. It really does serve to cut down the likelihood of the gay lover scenario. I figure it supports the claim “probable cause” for a federal arrest warrant, too.

One sentence fragment kind of stands out even so. “ … -[A]s well as video and photographic evidence ….”

The account is still blurry. But it’s early yet. However, clarity would be in the public interest. Let’s reveal the video and photographic evidence.
 
I found the SPECIAL AGENT’S affidavit interesting and informative. It really does serve to cut down the likelihood of the gay lover scenario. I figure it supports the claim “probable cause” for a federal arrest warrant, too.

One sentence fragment kind of stands out even so. “ … -[A]s well as video and photographic evidence ….”

The account is still blurry. But it’s early yet. However, clarity would be in the public interest. Let’s reveal the video and photographic evidence.
You really think the feds would be honest about that side of it though or try to spin it for Nancy?

At this point in my life I don't buy the official government narrative of anything
 
You really think the feds would be honest about that side of it though or try to spin it for Nancy?

At this point in my life I don't buy the official government narrative of anything
I think most reasonable people (which includes most young newish FBI Special Agents) are unlikely to lie under oath in a sworn warrant application to a Federal Magistrate Judge when she is busy citing the sources of her information and belief.

Instead, I assume she was told what she says she was told. I assume the audiotapes and any other images and videos she says she reviewed depict stuff supportive of what she says. I assume the recorded police calls support the allegations about the call. I assume the police body cams will confirm what the San Francisco responding police officers claimed they saw and heard.

If I were a young FBI Special Agent, I wouldn’t dream of lying or exaggerating a freaking thing which could be so readily falsified. Why would she?
 
Attempted kidnapping? Nancy was 3000 miles away. Talk about an overreach.

But boy did the Feds move fast when they want to. Meanwhile, nothing on the pipebomb guy from January 2021. And no Federal charges in the politically motivated murder of Cayler Ellingson two months ago.
 
I think most reasonable people (which includes most young newish FBI Special Agents) are unlikely to lie under oath in a sworn warrant application to a Federal Magistrate Judge when she is busy citing the sources of her information and belief.

Instead, I assume she was told what she says she was told. I assume the audiotapes and any other images and videos she says she reviewed depict stuff supportive of what she says. I assume the recorded police calls support the allegations about the call. I assume the police body cams will confirm what the San Francisco responding police officers claimed they saw and heard.

If I were a young FBI Special Agent, I wouldn’t dream of lying or exaggerating a freaking thing which could be so readily falsified. Why would she?
Why would she? Because they can make up whatever they want and have the media report it as such. If you honestly don't believe it was a gay lover spat why were they both in their underwear at 230am, why was the glass busted from the INSIDE, why did the 911 call say "his name is David he is my friend"?

If you really think this dude David Depape walked nearly buck naked to Pelosi's home, snuck by all that security then magically teleported into the house this guy is some Jason Bourne type assassin
 
I think most reasonable people (which includes most young newish FBI Special Agents) are unlikely to lie under oath in a sworn warrant application to a Federal Magistrate Judge when she is busy citing the sources of her information and belief.

Instead, I assume she was told what she says she was told. I assume the audiotapes and any other images and videos she says she reviewed depict stuff supportive of what she says. I assume the recorded police calls support the allegations about the call. I assume the police body cams will confirm what the San Francisco responding police officers claimed they saw and heard.

If I were a young FBI Special Agent, I wouldn’t dream of lying or exaggerating a freaking thing which could be so readily falsified. Why would she?


Are you joking?

To impress Chris Wray, you'd better lie on command, or you get escorted out
 
I think most reasonable people (which includes most young newish FBI Special Agents) are unlikely to lie under oath in a sworn warrant application to a Federal Magistrate Judge when she is busy citing the sources of her information and belief.

Instead, I assume she was told what she says she was told. I assume the audiotapes and any other images and videos she says she reviewed depict stuff supportive of what she says. I assume the recorded police calls support the allegations about the call. I assume the police body cams will confirm what the San Francisco responding police officers claimed they saw and heard.

If I were a young FBI Special Agent, I wouldn’t dream of lying or exaggerating a freaking thing which could be so readily falsified. Why would she?

Have you not learned anything? When FBI agents new or old are protected it makes it all the easier for the next recruit.
 
Attempted kidnapping? Nancy was 3000 miles away. Talk about an overreach.

But boy did the Feds move fast when they want to. Meanwhile, nothing on the pipebomb guy from January 2021. And no Federal charges in the politically motivated murder of Cayler Ellingson two months ago.
The kidnapping charge is a bargaining chip. I doubt even attempted kidnapping would stick.
 

Forum List

Back
Top