Peer Reviewed Research Finds Evidence of 2020 Fraud

[Delldude]

Very good article.

By a margin of 52% to 40%, voters believe that “cheating affected the outcome of the 2020 U.S. presidential election.” That’s per a Rasmussen Reports survey from this month. This stands in stark contrast to the countless news stories editorializing about “no evidence of voter fraud” and “the myth of voter fraud.”


It isn’t just Republicans who believe this cheating occurred. Even 34% of Democrats believe it, as do 38% of those who “somewhat” support President Biden. A broad range of Americans think this: men, women, all age groups, whites, those who are neither white nor black, Republicans, those who are neither Republicans nor Democrats, all job categories, all income groups except those making over $200,000 per year, and all education groups except those who attended graduate school.

And with good reason. New research of mine is forthcoming in the peer-reviewed economics journal Public Choice, and it finds evidence of around 255,000 excess votes (possibly as many as 368,000) for Joe Biden in six swing states where Donald Trump lodged accusations of fraud. Biden only carried these states – Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin – by a total of 313,253 votes. Excluding Michigan, the gap was 159,065.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/a...inds_evidence_of_2020_voter_fraud_147378.html

My research provides three tests of vote fraud.

 

[Moonglow]

Whoa all your site does is suggest that maybe a site may have information after you allow their intrusion into my hard drive.

 

[lennypartiv]

The absolutely proves our audit process needs to be totally revamped.

 

[Dekster]

Very good article.



https://www.realclearpolitics.com/a...inds_evidence_of_2020_voter_fraud_147378.html

He may want to rethink this part of his study: "With the focus on winning the state, there is no apparent reason why Democrats would get out the absentee ballot vote more in one precinct than in a neighboring precinct with similar political and demographic characteristics."

It underestmates how hyper-focused campaign targeting is these days and how much modeling is done to use tons of correlation data.

 

[Delldude]

Whoa all your site does is suggest that maybe a site may have information after you allow their intrusion into my hard drive.

If you're afraid to open it, then don't.

 

[Delldude]

He may want to rethink this part of his study: "With the focus on winning the state, there is no apparent reason why Democrats would get out the absentee ballot vote more in one precinct than in a neighboring precinct with similar political and demographic characteristics."

It underestmates how hyper-focused campaign targeting is these days and how much modeling is done to use tons of correlation data.

Possibly fraud in one adjacent precinct compared to the other. He is questioning that.

 

[Delldude]

Whoa all your site does is suggest that maybe a site may have information after you allow their intrusion into my hard drive.

Here's the actual link if yere skeered:

Simple tests for the extent of vote fraud with absentee and provisional ballots in the 2020 US presidential election

 

[Lastamender]

He may want to rethink this part of his study: "With the focus on winning the state, there is no apparent reason why Democrats would get out the absentee ballot vote more in one precinct than in a neighboring precinct with similar political and demographic characteristics."

It underestmates how hyper-focused campaign targeting is these days and how much modeling is done to use tons of correlation data.

 

[Dekster]

Possibly fraud in one adjacent precinct compared to the other. He is questioning that.

He seems to be assuming that to me. It could be that more people in one district are in a union and the union itself got out the extra vote in that hood. Could be that a church in that neighborhood got out the vote among their members. There are a lot more players than (D) or (R) parties when it comes to GOTV.

 

[Lastamender]

He seems to be assuming that to me. It could be that more people in one district are in a union and the union itself got out the extra vote in that hood. Could be that a church in that neighborhood got out the vote among their members. There are a lot more players than (D) or (R) parties when it comes to GOTV.

It could be there was massive fraud.

 

[Delldude]

It could be there was massive fraud.

I read that some of these states that sent unsolicited mail in ballots actually had operatives go door to door and badger people into completing their vote, then of course, we'll mail it for ya.

One of the provisions in Pelosi's HR-1 was exactly that, unsolicited ballots.

 

[jwoodie]

Nice article, but we already know 2020 resembled a Third World election. The Dems saw their chance to destroy America and are making the most of it. The next elections had better be squeaky clean or there will be a revolution. (And I don't mean a another sit-in at the Capitol.)

 

[LaDairis]

They had to cheat to get Low IQ Joe through the primary.

Before they started cheating, this is what actual Americans did at the voting booth....

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-primary-elections/iowa-results

Petey 26.2%
The Bern 26.1%
Pocahontas 18%
Low IQ Joe 15.8


2020 New Hampshire Democratic presidential primary[2][21]

Candidate	Votes	%	Delegates[dg]
Bernie Sanders	76,384	25.60	9
Pete Buttigieg	72,454	24.28	9
Amy Klobuchar	58,714	19.68	6
Elizabeth Warren	27,429	9.19
Joe Biden	24,944	8.36
Tom Steyer	10,732	3.60
Tulsi Gabbard	9,755	3.27
Andrew Yang	8,312	2.79
Michael Bloomberg (write-in)[22][21]	4,675	1.57
Deval Patrick	1,271	0.43
Michael Bennet	952	0.32

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Very good article.



https://www.realclearpolitics.com/a...inds_evidence_of_2020_voter_fraud_147378.html

Haha, what a joke.
There is a reason this rightwing activist is publishing analysis (not evidence) in a low end political science journal, instead of taking evidence to the DHS.

See if you can guess it.

Even funnier is how he discusses people "believing" in election fraud (for emotional impact), while saying he has "finally" found some evidence.

Maybe see if you can figure out why that is hilarious and sad.

 

[Lastamender]

Haha, what a joke.

Why?

 

[LaDairis]

Why?

This is the same tactic as 911 and global warming.

The Zionist Fascist is in control of the top of "DHS" (for Israel). Giving them "evidence" is like giving a laptop to Chris Wray...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

This is the same tactic as 911 and global warming.

The Zionist Fascist is in control of the top of "DHS" (for Israel). Giving them "evidence" is like giving a laptop to Chris Wray...

That's a nice little game you have all rigged up for yourself.

 

[Stann]

Very good article.



https://www.realclearpolitics.com/a...inds_evidence_of_2020_voter_fraud_147378.html

Most of the few voter fraud findings were done by trump voters. I hope you realize that.

 

[Delldude]

Most of the few voter fraud findings were done by trump voters. I hope you realize that.

Not what this research is about.

 

[mamooth]

Trump cult sore-loser butthurt isn't actually news, you know, and that's all this is.