Your stating the obvious again.
You mean “you’re.” And not is obvious. So why do you always post shit which disregards it? You’re an odd little troll.
It was set at 10,000 dollars, I know because I'm Sherlock Holmes, you don't know because you're a trumpanzee:
View attachment 1150993
Making you support your claims is helpful. You don’t usually bother, even when pressed.
I have no idea if there were conditions or not, one would expect there would be if a foreign visitor to the US is arrested for child sex crimes committed in the US, else what's the point in arresting him?
Your “expectation” isn’t the same as either the law or conditions imposed on the bail.
The suspicion is based on the fact that he was permitted to travel freely back to Israel after a carefully planned multi organizational sting operation that included the FBI.
You previously failed to state that your claim was a mere suspicion. Glad I helped you admit as much. Was he “permitted” to travel if there were no conditions set by the judge? You seem awfully loose with your claims versus your support (if any) for those claims.
We do know the charges apply yo him, he was arrested and charged with:
I didn’t suggest that they don’t apply to human we already know he was arrested and charged. I wonder if you (being the hack you always are) have forgotten about the presumption of innocence and the burden of proof.
You complained that an Iranian source was cited and then on that basis rejected the veracity of the story. You ignored the fact that I cited multiple sources, including US and Israeli. Your first post was simply dismissive, you expressed no outrage that an Israeli government employee was allowed to escape justice.
Wrong again. You cited an Iranian news outlet. Then you denied that you had cited an Iranian news outlet. They, in turn, cited “reports.” Reports can be truthful or false, in whole or in part. Like you, they seem willing to presume guilt.
And maybe he is actually guilty. I don’t know. Neither do you. But it’s a matter of indifference to you since the value of the story to a mere troll, like you, is simply airing the accusation at all. Gee. I wonder why?
Your behavior here is the implicit defense of a child predator,
No it sure isn’t. My behavior [sic] here Is explicitly to challenge your propaganda efforts in all things. It has nothing to do at all with defending an
alleged child predator.
you've complained about everything but the criminal and his escape right under the nose of the FBI.
We don’t know that he is a criminal. All we know is that he has been charged. Those are not synonyms. And “escape” is obviously the wrong word. If he wasn’t denied the right to travel, then the correct term remains, “travelled.”
A court date was set. If he fails to return on the date set, then (but only then) would he be a fugitive. (Assuming no travel restrictions had been placed on him. If so, he would only be in violation of the terms of his bail.)
You remain a troll.
www.cbsnews.com
www.presstv.ir
