PAYBACK: House GOP launches into investigation of Cassidy Hutchinson

[kaz]

It really wasn't hearsay.
She simply repeated what she was told.

You lost me, repeating what she was told is what hearsay means

 

[Dragonlady]

No, she is NOT allowed to give testimony of what the SS told her.
And the SS never told her that Trump tried to "grab the wheel".

Why do members of the Trump Cult make such a big deal about this testimony? There have been charges laid in connection with anything that did or did not happen in that car, and whether Trump did it or not is irrelevant to his attempt to overthrow the government.

What do you go batshit crazy over nothing and ignore EVERYTHING else we watched Trump do and say on that day????

Talk about putting the emPHASis on the wrong sylLAbles.

 

[Dragonlady]

Well, that clears up why they had a "witness" who knew nothing testify, vermin

Repeatedly calling other poster "vermin". How to tell us you're a member of a Cult without saying you're a member of a cult.

You clowns need a new act. Your Lord and Saviour barely got 51% of the vote at the Iowa Caucuses even though nearly 70% of the people there think that Trump really did win the 2020 election. If more than 2/3 of caucus voters believe his lies, but 1/3 of those true believers still voted for someone else to be your candidate, Trump's campaign is in trouble.

Donations are WAY down.

 

[0311]

Repeatedly calling other poster "vermin". How to tell us you're a member of a Cult without saying you're a member of a cult.

You clowns need a new act. Your Lord and Saviour barely got 51% of the vote at the Iowa Caucuses even though nearly 70% of the people there think that Trump really did win the 2020 election. If more than 2/3 of caucus voters believe his lies, but 1/3 of those true believers still voted for someone else to be your candidate, Trump's campaign is in trouble.

Donations are WAY down.

The turnout on Tuesday was the lowest since 2000.

49% of Iowa Republicans didn't vote.

Add the total DeSatan and Nimatata Nikki Randhawa (Haley) received on Tuesday and the total Iowa Republicans who did NOT vote P01135809 jumps to 89.3%. Not good.

 

[Dragonlady]

The turnout on Tuesday was the lowest since 2000.

49% of Iowa Republicans didn't vote.

Add the total DeSatan and Nimatata Nikki Randhawa (Haley) received on Tuesday and the total Iowa Republicans who did NOT vote P01135809 jumps to 89.3%. Not good.

Isn't lower turn out supposed to favour Trump???? Why go out into the cold since neither Haley nor DeSantis are going to win or even come close to it? Trump supporters are supposed to be willing to die for their Saviour.

How can you be certain that the 49% of the Republicans who stayed home would vote for Trump. 68% of the people who WENT to the caucuses said Trump won the 2020 election and Biden is an "illegitimate President". Yet 1/3 of those people voted for Haley or DeSantis

 

[0311]

Isn't lower turn out supposed to favour Trump???? Why go out into the cold since neither Haley nor DeSantis are going to win or even come close to it? Trump supporters are supposed to be willing to die for their Saviour.

How can you be certain that the 49% of the Republicans who stayed home would vote for Trump. 68% of the people who WENT to the caucuses said Trump won the 2020 election and Biden is an "illegitimate President". Yet 1/3 of those people voted for Haley or DeSantis

According to lexit polls taken when vote was over, only 49% of Registered Republicans turned out. Low turn out should favored P01135809, the weather was ugly but this time low turnpout.

 

[surada]

Suck it up, buttercup. You reap what you sow.

She wasn't there. How stupid are these people? Interview Tony Ornato, chief of staff. Are they all cowards?

 

[Mac-7]

View attachment 887932

Having burned through the people with supposed evidence against the Bidens and several others, the House Oversight Subcommittee will now investigate Cassidy Hutchinson, former assistant to Mark Meadows, even though there is no evidence that she did anything wrong other than to relay truthful testimony that they don’t like.

Their stated reason is near-criminally ironic. They want to get to the bottom of why Hutchinson changed her recall and testimony regarding the days leading up to January 6th.

The trouble for the Subcommittee is that Hutchinson has already answered the question, and her explanation is both simple, easily understood, and damning.

Her testimony changed when she rejected Stefan Passantino, the lawyer provided by Trump and MAGA, and got her own attorney, who advised her to tell the truth and kept her out of traps.

But there is something even more sinister likely swimming below the announcement’s surface.

More at the link below...

PAYBACK: House GOP launches into investigation of Cassidy Hutchinson

The MAGA House GOP is willing to do anything to protect Donald Trump, including trying to destroy the credibility of Cassidy Hutchinson.

washingtonpress.com

Sickening! No low is too low for House Republicans. What do you think?

She is getting more attention than she deserves

Her testimony was nothing more than hearsay with no witnesses to back her up

 

[rightwinger]

She is getting more attention than she deserves

Her testimony was nothing more than hearsay with no witnesses to back her up

Not at all
She was a member of Trumps staff and was present for most of what she testified to
What was Trump told?
How did he react?

 

[Mac-7]

Not at all
She was a member of Trumps staff and was present for most of what she testified to
What was Trump told?
How did he react?

The lead story for libs was

“TRUMP ATTACKS SECRET SERVICE AND TRIES TO WRESTLE STEERING WHEEL AWAY” *

* according to someone who was not even there

 

[justoffal]

The lead story for libs was

“TRUMP ATTACKS SECRET SERVICE AND TRIES TO WRESTLE STEERING WHEEL AWAY” *

* according to someone who was not even there

It didn't age well....but let's face it...the whole narrative now from both sides is 50/50 fact/Bullshit..So much so that it is no longer possible to put stock in anything at all in the mass media.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

View attachment 887932

Having burned through the people with supposed evidence against the Bidens and several others, the House Oversight Subcommittee will now investigate Cassidy Hutchinson, former assistant to Mark Meadows, even though there is no evidence that she did anything wrong other than to relay truthful testimony that they don’t like.

Their stated reason is near-criminally ironic. They want to get to the bottom of why Hutchinson changed her recall and testimony regarding the days leading up to January 6th.

The trouble for the Subcommittee is that Hutchinson has already answered the question, and her explanation is both simple, easily understood, and damning.

Her testimony changed when she rejected Stefan Passantino, the lawyer provided by Trump and MAGA, and got her own attorney, who advised her to tell the truth and kept her out of traps.

But there is something even more sinister likely swimming below the announcement’s surface.

More at the link below...

PAYBACK: House GOP launches into investigation of Cassidy Hutchinson

The MAGA House GOP is willing to do anything to protect Donald Trump, including trying to destroy the credibility of Cassidy Hutchinson.

washingtonpress.com

Sickening! No low is too low for House Republicans. What do you think?

So she lied under oath

Don’t Republicans get charged for that??

 

[Mac-7]

It didn't age well....but let's face it...the whole narrative now from both sides is 50/50 fact/Bullshit..So much so that it is no longer possible to put stock in anything at all in the mass media.

Lib lies that lead to apathy hurt trump

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Lib lies that lead to apathy hurt trump

????????????????

 

[rightwinger]

The lead story for libs was

“TRUMP ATTACKS SECRET SERVICE AND TRIES TO WRESTLE STEERING WHEEL AWAY” *

* according to someone who was not even there

Just another Trump throws a tantrum story

 

[bendog]

Sorta wish they'd have driven Orange to the Capital and let him meet and greet his fans.

 

[Zincwarrior]

So she lied under oath

Don’t Republicans get charged for that??

She said she was told that.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

She repeated what she was told and what she overheard and what she saw, yes.

 

[Billiejeens]

She said she was told that.

Correct
But, was she?

That certainly was not your wing nut position before

 

[rightwinger]

She repeated what she was told and what she overheard and what she saw, yes.

We could have just asked Trump but we know he would just lie