- Oct 31, 2012
- 53,922
- 52,838
- 3,605
- Thread starter
- #21
I think they know how negatively the public sees them. I mean, they went out of their way on both sides to lie repeatedly to show how full of poo they all are whether it be Fox news or CNN. At the end of the day though, they know that with America divided they will pick one news over the other regardlessThe media coverage was free press for Trump, especially for a press that is disdained by most Americans. It was all really good press for Trump.Jon Stewart: Why Is the Media Ignoring Ron Paul? - YouTube
This video is part of my evidence for what I'm saying
Notice how the media treated Ron Paul when he ran for President. Even when he made a good showing in the polls or even won a state, the media completely ignored him. This is how they treat people they don't like.
Conversely, the media talked about Trump nonstop and still does. And at every GOP debate he was front and center. This is who they treat someone they want to win
As they say in show biz, and news about you, even negative, is good news.
I think you are wrong on this. The media writes attack articles on anyone who
1) They don't like.
2) Is relevant.
3) Poses threat.
The problem with Ron Paul is number 2) and 3). While Ron Paul is a great patriot, he is not menacing enough, nor relevant enough, to justify endless attack pieces.
Now do a google search for Trump, you will see endless attack articles. Ask a deep stater what they think about Trump - you will see endless rage that reaches the Christmas tables. Ask a member of the free shit army what they think of Trump - again, endless rage.
They also gave him free press with his reality TV shows.
I still submit I'm right. There is nothing conservative about the Federal Leviathan and never will be, so there is no room for those who are.
If you are a Conservative, you don't have a representative government and never really has had one, and never will have one.
They don't see it this way - it's negative coverage.
I also notice when both CNN and Fox news start to agree on things. That is a dangerous sign. For example, when Obama wanted to go into Syria, both CNN and Fox news gave us continual coverage of the "war crimes" of Syria to try and drum up support for going to war. But something inexplicable happened, the propaganda did not work. People still did not want to go to war............again, so Obama backed down.