Pam Bondi: "I don't HAVE to say anything." Finally! The correct response

Seymour Flops

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2021
Messages
19,983
Reaction score
17,037
Points
2,288
Location
Texas
This in answer to Senator Blumenthal's recitation of the most current list of things Republicans "have to" say anytime Democrats ask them to.

(00:45)



No. We don't have to say that Donald Trump lost the 2020 election and we won't. Not in answer to a Democrat who wants it to mean that we agree that it was the fairest, most honest and most secure election in history. We don't have to say that January 6th rioter should not be pardoned. We don't have to say that illegals aliens who traffic children and murder Americans are "migrants." We don't have to say "she" when referring to Rachel Levine, nor "they" when referring to his suitcase theif boyfriend, and we don't have to call Bruce Jenner "Tiffany" or whatever he wants us to call him.

We dont' have to say anything in exactly the way Democrats want us to say, just because they are triggered by the slightest deviation in opinion.

I work with a lot of young people who are on the autism spectrum, and one common trait when they are children is that they insist that their friends play exactly they way they want them to play. They get very vocally upset if the friend or friends wants to do it another way. So, of course, they have difficulty maintaining friendships. They make themselves hard to get along with. Then I step in and teach them social skills.

I don't hold that against them. They are neuro-atypical and they are children.

Democrats, what is your excuse?
 
This in answer to Senator Blumenthal's recitation of the most current list of things Republicans "have to" say anytime Democrats ask them to.

(00:45)



No. We don't have to say that Donald Trump lost the 2020 election and we won't. Not in answer to a Democrat who wants it to mean that we agree that it was the fairest, most honest and most secure election in history. We don't have to say that January 6th rioter should not be pardoned. We don't have to say that illegals aliens who traffic children and murder Americans are "migrants." We don't have to say "she" when referring to Rachel Levine, nor "they" when referring to his suitcase theif boyfriend, and we don't have to call Bruce Jenner "Tiffany" or whatever he wants us to call him.

We dont' have to say anything in exactly the way Democrats want us to say, just because they are triggered by the slightest deviation in opinion.

I work with a lot of young people who are on the autism spectrum, and one common trait when they are children is that they insist that their friends play exactly they way they want them to play. They get very vocally upset if the friend or friends wants to do it another way. So, of course, they have difficulty maintaining friendships. They make themselves hard to get along with. Then I step in and teach them social skills.

I don't hold that against them. They are neuro-atypical and they are children.

Democrats, what is your excuse?

Easy question but she wouldn't answer.
She's nothing but a bought and paid for suckup.
 
Pam Bondi is head and shoulders a much better Attorney General than Garland is.
I didn't like Garland but I doubt Biondi will be better.
 
Remember how Trump had an "A" team before? If that's what it was it didn't last. Many many turnovers and this sub "C" team won't be any better.
 
  • Fact
Reactions: IM2
Remember how Trump had an "A" team before? If that's what it was it didn't last. Many many turnovers and this sub "C" team won't be any better.
Who won the 2024 presidential election?
 
This senate hearing is a constitutionally mandated activity. If Biondi can't answer questions she should be rejected as a nominee.
 
This senate hearing is a constitutionally mandated activity. If Biondi can't answer questions she should be rejected as a nominee.
you mean like when dems picks were questioned and said stuff like I dont know what a woman is cause I am not a biologist.
 
This senate hearing is a constitutionally mandated activity.
No, it isn't. Advice and consent is mandated, not hearings. The GOP could just vote and confirm her with no hearing.

They like to be own teevee, so they have hearings for a foregone conclusion.
If Biondi can't answer questions she should be rejected as a nominee.
She won't be.

Irrelevant.
It isn't irrelevant. You HAVE TO say who won the 2024 election. Because I say so.
The Senates job is to advise and consent, not rubber stamp.
They will consent.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom