Palestinians Massing At The Israeli Border

[Mindful]

A Fox News journalist reports from the latest March of Return riots, which the palestinians and their supporters still claim are “peaceful demonstrations.”


That’s right – grenades and IEDs (improvised explosive devices).

Note also the text on the screen: Hamas threatens more protests at Gaza-Israel border. The palestinians have been claiming that these are a spontaneous uprising by the common man, and not Hamas-organized.

Peaceful my ass Hamas.

Israellycool.com

 

[Hollie]

I had to go to that respository of Islamic Terrorist propaganda (see below), to find news on the failed Islamic terrorist gee-had at the Israeli border.

Like the failed flotilla stunt, the border gee-had has become another attention-getting stunt that achieved nothing, aside from a lot of dead and injured Islamic terrorists.



Great March of Return

 

[Sixties Fan]

• 
  Earlier on Saturday, violent clashes between Palestinian demonstrators and Israeli soldiers broke out along the border fence. IDF soldiers used riot dispersal methods to keep the demonstrators away from the border fence, the Walla news site reported.
  
  According to the news site, several demonstrators attempted to sabotage the border fence.
  
  No injuries were reported in the incident.
  
  The IDF said it had neutralized suspected explosive devices that were thrown at the fence during violent demonstrations along the Gaza border Friday, where some 8000 Palestinians protested, with some rioting and clashing with Israeli troops.
  
  Some protesters burned tires and threw explosive devices, rocks and grenades at Israeli troops guarding the security fence, the army said.
  
  Soldiers responded with tear gas and, in some instances, live fire, the army said.
  
  The Hamas-run health ministry in Gaza said 21 Palestinians were wounded during the clashes by Israeli fire.
  

(full article online)

Balloon cluster with incendiary device launched from Gaza; IDF hits Hamas posts

 

[Slyhunter]

• 
  Earlier on Saturday, violent clashes between Palestinian demonstrators and Israeli soldiers broke out along the border fence. IDF soldiers used riot dispersal methods to keep the demonstrators away from the border fence, the Walla news site reported.
  
  According to the news site, several demonstrators attempted to sabotage the border fence.
  
  No injuries were reported in the incident.
  
  The IDF said it had neutralized suspected explosive devices that were thrown at the fence during violent demonstrations along the Gaza border Friday, where some 8000 Palestinians protested, with some rioting and clashing with Israeli troops.
  
  Some protesters burned tires and threw explosive devices, rocks and grenades at Israeli troops guarding the security fence, the army said.
  
  Soldiers responded with tear gas and, in some instances, live fire, the army said.
  
  The Hamas-run health ministry in Gaza said 21 Palestinians were wounded during the clashes by Israeli fire.

(full article online)

Balloon cluster with incendiary device launched from Gaza; IDF hits Hamas posts

Why can't the Palestinians let the Israelites live in peace?

 

[Hollie]

The IDF delivered some Islamic terrorist resistance methodology in the Islamic terrorist enclave sometimes called “Gaza”.




IDF strikes Hamas after explosive devices launched from Gaza into Israel

The Israeli military said Saturday evening that it struck Hamas targets in the southern Gaza Strip after balloons carrying explosive devices drifted from the coastal enclave into Israel.

 

[Hollie]

• 
  Earlier on Saturday, violent clashes between Palestinian demonstrators and Israeli soldiers broke out along the border fence. IDF soldiers used riot dispersal methods to keep the demonstrators away from the border fence, the Walla news site reported.
  
  According to the news site, several demonstrators attempted to sabotage the border fence.
  
  No injuries were reported in the incident.
  
  The IDF said it had neutralized suspected explosive devices that were thrown at the fence during violent demonstrations along the Gaza border Friday, where some 8000 Palestinians protested, with some rioting and clashing with Israeli troops.
  
  Some protesters burned tires and threw explosive devices, rocks and grenades at Israeli troops guarding the security fence, the army said.
  
  Soldiers responded with tear gas and, in some instances, live fire, the army said.
  
  The Hamas-run health ministry in Gaza said 21 Palestinians were wounded during the clashes by Israeli fire.

(full article online)

Balloon cluster with incendiary device launched from Gaza; IDF hits Hamas posts

Why can't the Palestinians let the Israelites live in peace?

Idolatry of a 7th century Arab warlord and promoting his life and times as a model for all of Arabism for all time.

 

[Hollie]

It does appear that the failed border gee-had has largely run its course as just another pointless stunt orchestrated by Hamas for publicity purposes.

Smaller scale Islamic terrorist attacks will no doubt continue and this is where israel may choose to defend its border with snipers outfitted with night vision gear.



Hamas Heightens Risk of War With Violent Nights on Gaza Border

Hamas heightens risk of war with violent nights on Gaza border

The Israeli army has increased its use of live fire during the nighttime demonstrations, which are more violent than the weekly Friday protests.

Violent nighttime incidents along the Gaza-Israel border are creating a new risk of a broader conflict with Hamas and are different in nature than the weekly protests that have been carried out on the border on Fridays for almost a year.

 

[Sixties Fan]

CAMERA last week prompted correction of a CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) report which erroneously counted gunmen, infiltrators and Palestinians who engaged in other violent attacks at the Gaza border with Israel among demonstrators killed by Israeli fire. While the CBC commendably set the record straight on this point, it declined to remove the completely irrelevant discussion of Canadians joining ISIS from the article about Canadians joining the Israeli army, the friendly military of a Canadian ally.

In her Feb. 22 article (“I don’t see why I shouldn’t have to serve’: Why young, Jewish Canadians are enlisting in the Israeli military“), Elise von Scheel erred on U.N. statistics, stating:

The United Nations estimates more than 200 Palestinians were killed and thousands more injured during demonstrations that lasted for most of the year and continue still.
The article provides a hyperlink to the U.N. source in question. The source does not substantiate the claim that 200 Palestinians were killed “during demonstrations.” The U.N. document (“More casualties sustained during the ‘Great March of Return'”) details Palestinian casualties from March 30 through Oct. 31, 2018 as part of the totality of the “March of Return” events – which include violent attacks and infiltrations, alongside

(full article online)

CAMERA Prompts Correction After CBC Counts Gunmen, Infiltrators as Demonstrators

 

[Sixties Fan]

[ Ah, the British.......with 15 colonies.....still....to their name.....what to help the Arab colonizers take away land from indigenous people, just as they did ]

BBC Radio 4 tells listeners that Gaza rioters were ‘innocent civilians’

 

[Sixties Fan]

[ Towing the line....]

BBC News website unquestioningly amplifies UNHRC’s report

 

[Sixties Fan]

Two incendiary balloons launched from Gaza explode in Israel

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestinians Massing At The Israeli Border
⁜→ Sixties Fan, et al,

I cannot understand how the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC)(Fatou Bensouda) can hold and credibility at all by demonstrating the preconceived notion (by publicly warning that those responsible for the killing of Palestinians near the Gaza border) that Israel is responsible for the attack on the border barrier, and might be prosecuted by the ICC. What good is the Office of the Prosecutor if they are just going to prosecute the popular villain, instead of the actual Jihadist designated as a Terrorist Organization and that organized the March.

It only demonstrates how utterly corrupt the Prosecutor's Office is when it encourages the Protestors to storm the border using the great number of civilians to mask terrorist infiltration. That is a clear violation of Rule 97 of the Customary and International Humanitarian Law (“utilizing the presence of a civilian or other protected person to render certain points, areas or military forces immune from military operations” constitutes a war crime in international armed conflicts"), ICC Statute, Article 8(2)(b)(xxiii).

Two incendiary balloons launched from Gaza explode in Israel

[/URL][/SIZE]

• Creates a regime of universal jurisdiction over the unlawful and intentional use of explosives and other lethal devices in, into, or against various defined public places with intent to kill or cause serious bodily injury, or with intent to cause extensive destruction of the public place.

​

I always find it rather funny that the Arab Palestinians, who claim to be the victim in the Great Return March would openly and so brazenly violate the international convention.

Any deaths involved, in my opinion, falls on the International Coordinating Committee (ie HAMAS) for the Great Return March.

◈◈ The Office of the Prosecutor, ICC, also should be charged with an unethical act in the execution of a duty that is not illegal but is improperly performed. It is an act through which the ICC intentionally makes the allegation that → for purposes other than bringing the designated terrorist organization to justice → damages the character of a nation that is defending its territorial integrity. This action, on the part of the ICC Prosecutor, encouraged further threats to the peace, and invited a continuation for acts of aggression on the part of a designated terrorist organization.

The world can only wonder if the ICC had the aim of furthering the criminal activity to breach the border → or promote the criminal purpose of the HAMAS, where such activity or purpose involves the commission of a crime within the jurisdiction of the ICC itself. Obviously, the Prosecutor cannot prosecute itself.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Shusha]

RE: Palestinians Massing At The Israeli Border
⁜→ Sixties Fan, et al,

I cannot understand how the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC)(Fatou Bensouda) can hold and credibility at all by demonstrating the preconceived notion (by publicly warning that those responsible for the killing of Palestinians near the Gaza border) that Israel is responsible for the attack on the border barrier, and might be prosecuted by the ICC. What good is the Office of the Prosecutor if they are just going to prosecute the popular villain, instead of the actual Jihadist designated as a Terrorist Organization and that organized the March.

It only demonstrates how utterly corrupt the Prosecutor's Office is when it encourages the Protestors to storm the border using the great number of civilians to mask terrorist infiltration. That is a clear violation of Rule 97 of the Customary and International Humanitarian Law (“utilizing the presence of a civilian or other protected person to render certain points, areas or military forces immune from military operations” constitutes a war crime in international armed conflicts"), ICC Statute, Article 8(2)(b)(xxiii).

Two incendiary balloons launched from Gaza explode in Israel

[/URL][/SIZE]

• Creates a regime of universal jurisdiction over the unlawful and intentional use of explosives and other lethal devices in, into, or against various defined public places with intent to kill or cause serious bodily injury, or with intent to cause extensive destruction of the public place.

View attachment 248698
​

I always find it rather funny that the Arab Palestinians, who claim to be the victim in the Great Return March would openly and so brazenly violate the international convention.

Any deaths involved, in my opinion, falls on the International Coordinating Committee (ie HAMAS) for the Great Return March.

◈◈ The Office of the Prosecutor, ICC, also should be charged with an unethical act in the execution of a duty that is not illegal but is improperly performed. It is an act through which the ICC intentionally makes the allegation that → for purposes other than bringing the designated terrorist organization to justice → damages the character of a nation that is defending its territorial integrity. This action, on the part of the ICC Prosecutor, encouraged further threats to the peace, and invited a continuation for acts of aggression on the part of a designated terrorist organization.

The world can only wonder if the ICC had the aim of furthering the criminal activity to breach the border → or promote the criminal purpose of the HAMAS, where such activity or purpose involves the commission of a crime within the jurisdiction of the ICC itself. Obviously, the Prosecutor cannot prosecute itself.

Most Respectfully,
R

Its an on-going and insidious shifting of law when it comes to Israel. Law is defined and applied differently to Israel. We've seen it before. We will see it again.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestinians Massing At The Israeli Border
⁜→ Sixties Fan, et al,

I cannot understand how the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC)(Fatou Bensouda) can hold and credibility at all by demonstrating the preconceived notion (by publicly warning that those responsible for the killing of Palestinians near the Gaza border) that Israel is responsible for the attack on the border barrier, and might be prosecuted by the ICC. What good is the Office of the Prosecutor if they are just going to prosecute the popular villain, instead of the actual Jihadist designated as a Terrorist Organization and that organized the March.

It only demonstrates how utterly corrupt the Prosecutor's Office is when it encourages the Protestors to storm the border using the great number of civilians to mask terrorist infiltration. That is a clear violation of Rule 97 of the Customary and International Humanitarian Law (“utilizing the presence of a civilian or other protected person to render certain points, areas or military forces immune from military operations” constitutes a war crime in international armed conflicts"), ICC Statute, Article 8(2)(b)(xxiii).

Two incendiary balloons launched from Gaza explode in Israel

[/URL][/SIZE]

• Creates a regime of universal jurisdiction over the unlawful and intentional use of explosives and other lethal devices in, into, or against various defined public places with intent to kill or cause serious bodily injury, or with intent to cause extensive destruction of the public place.

View attachment 248698
​

I always find it rather funny that the Arab Palestinians, who claim to be the victim in the Great Return March would openly and so brazenly violate the international convention.

Any deaths involved, in my opinion, falls on the International Coordinating Committee (ie HAMAS) for the Great Return March.

◈◈ The Office of the Prosecutor, ICC, also should be charged with an unethical act in the execution of a duty that is not illegal but is improperly performed. It is an act through which the ICC intentionally makes the allegation that → for purposes other than bringing the designated terrorist organization to justice → damages the character of a nation that is defending its territorial integrity. This action, on the part of the ICC Prosecutor, encouraged further threats to the peace, and invited a continuation for acts of aggression on the part of a designated terrorist organization.

The world can only wonder if the ICC had the aim of furthering the criminal activity to breach the border → or promote the criminal purpose of the HAMAS, where such activity or purpose involves the commission of a crime within the jurisdiction of the ICC itself. Obviously, the Prosecutor cannot prosecute itself.

Most Respectfully,
R

Has Israel filed a complaint with the ICC?

 

[Sixties Fan]

RE: Palestinians Massing At The Israeli Border
⁜→ Sixties Fan, et al,

I cannot understand how the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC)(Fatou Bensouda) can hold and credibility at all by demonstrating the preconceived notion (by publicly warning that those responsible for the killing of Palestinians near the Gaza border) that Israel is responsible for the attack on the border barrier, and might be prosecuted by the ICC. What good is the Office of the Prosecutor if they are just going to prosecute the popular villain, instead of the actual Jihadist designated as a Terrorist Organization and that organized the March.

It only demonstrates how utterly corrupt the Prosecutor's Office is when it encourages the Protestors to storm the border using the great number of civilians to mask terrorist infiltration. That is a clear violation of Rule 97 of the Customary and International Humanitarian Law (“utilizing the presence of a civilian or other protected person to render certain points, areas or military forces immune from military operations” constitutes a war crime in international armed conflicts"), ICC Statute, Article 8(2)(b)(xxiii).

Two incendiary balloons launched from Gaza explode in Israel

[/URL][/SIZE]

• Creates a regime of universal jurisdiction over the unlawful and intentional use of explosives and other lethal devices in, into, or against various defined public places with intent to kill or cause serious bodily injury, or with intent to cause extensive destruction of the public place.

View attachment 248698
​

I always find it rather funny that the Arab Palestinians, who claim to be the victim in the Great Return March would openly and so brazenly violate the international convention.

Any deaths involved, in my opinion, falls on the International Coordinating Committee (ie HAMAS) for the Great Return March.

◈◈ The Office of the Prosecutor, ICC, also should be charged with an unethical act in the execution of a duty that is not illegal but is improperly performed. It is an act through which the ICC intentionally makes the allegation that → for purposes other than bringing the designated terrorist organization to justice → damages the character of a nation that is defending its territorial integrity. This action, on the part of the ICC Prosecutor, encouraged further threats to the peace, and invited a continuation for acts of aggression on the part of a designated terrorist organization.

The world can only wonder if the ICC had the aim of furthering the criminal activity to breach the border → or promote the criminal purpose of the HAMAS, where such activity or purpose involves the commission of a crime within the jurisdiction of the ICC itself. Obviously, the Prosecutor cannot prosecute itself.

Most Respectfully,
R

Has Israel filed a complaint with the ICC?

If you did not catch this news the first time.......

IDF reservists to file complaint against Hamas, PLO to ICC

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestinians Massing At The Israeli Border
⁜→ Sixties Fan, et al,

I cannot understand how the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC)(Fatou Bensouda) can hold and credibility at all by demonstrating the preconceived notion (by publicly warning that those responsible for the killing of Palestinians near the Gaza border) that Israel is responsible for the attack on the border barrier, and might be prosecuted by the ICC. What good is the Office of the Prosecutor if they are just going to prosecute the popular villain, instead of the actual Jihadist designated as a Terrorist Organization and that organized the March.

It only demonstrates how utterly corrupt the Prosecutor's Office is when it encourages the Protestors to storm the border using the great number of civilians to mask terrorist infiltration. That is a clear violation of Rule 97 of the Customary and International Humanitarian Law (“utilizing the presence of a civilian or other protected person to render certain points, areas or military forces immune from military operations” constitutes a war crime in international armed conflicts"), ICC Statute, Article 8(2)(b)(xxiii).

Two incendiary balloons launched from Gaza explode in Israel

[/URL][/SIZE]

• Creates a regime of universal jurisdiction over the unlawful and intentional use of explosives and other lethal devices in, into, or against various defined public places with intent to kill or cause serious bodily injury, or with intent to cause extensive destruction of the public place.

View attachment 248698
​

I always find it rather funny that the Arab Palestinians, who claim to be the victim in the Great Return March would openly and so brazenly violate the international convention.

Any deaths involved, in my opinion, falls on the International Coordinating Committee (ie HAMAS) for the Great Return March.

◈◈ The Office of the Prosecutor, ICC, also should be charged with an unethical act in the execution of a duty that is not illegal but is improperly performed. It is an act through which the ICC intentionally makes the allegation that → for purposes other than bringing the designated terrorist organization to justice → damages the character of a nation that is defending its territorial integrity. This action, on the part of the ICC Prosecutor, encouraged further threats to the peace, and invited a continuation for acts of aggression on the part of a designated terrorist organization.

The world can only wonder if the ICC had the aim of furthering the criminal activity to breach the border → or promote the criminal purpose of the HAMAS, where such activity or purpose involves the commission of a crime within the jurisdiction of the ICC itself. Obviously, the Prosecutor cannot prosecute itself.

Most Respectfully,
R

Has Israel filed a complaint with the ICC?

If you did not catch this news the first time.......

IDF reservists to file complaint against Hamas, PLO to ICC

Good luck with that. Those talking points have already been debunked.

 

[Sixties Fan]

RE: Palestinians Massing At The Israeli Border
⁜→ Sixties Fan, et al,

I cannot understand how the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC)(Fatou Bensouda) can hold and credibility at all by demonstrating the preconceived notion (by publicly warning that those responsible for the killing of Palestinians near the Gaza border) that Israel is responsible for the attack on the border barrier, and might be prosecuted by the ICC. What good is the Office of the Prosecutor if they are just going to prosecute the popular villain, instead of the actual Jihadist designated as a Terrorist Organization and that organized the March.

It only demonstrates how utterly corrupt the Prosecutor's Office is when it encourages the Protestors to storm the border using the great number of civilians to mask terrorist infiltration. That is a clear violation of Rule 97 of the Customary and International Humanitarian Law (“utilizing the presence of a civilian or other protected person to render certain points, areas or military forces immune from military operations” constitutes a war crime in international armed conflicts"), ICC Statute, Article 8(2)(b)(xxiii).

Two incendiary balloons launched from Gaza explode in Israel

[/URL][/SIZE]

• Creates a regime of universal jurisdiction over the unlawful and intentional use of explosives and other lethal devices in, into, or against various defined public places with intent to kill or cause serious bodily injury, or with intent to cause extensive destruction of the public place.

View attachment 248698
​

I always find it rather funny that the Arab Palestinians, who claim to be the victim in the Great Return March would openly and so brazenly violate the international convention.

Any deaths involved, in my opinion, falls on the International Coordinating Committee (ie HAMAS) for the Great Return March.

◈◈ The Office of the Prosecutor, ICC, also should be charged with an unethical act in the execution of a duty that is not illegal but is improperly performed. It is an act through which the ICC intentionally makes the allegation that → for purposes other than bringing the designated terrorist organization to justice → damages the character of a nation that is defending its territorial integrity. This action, on the part of the ICC Prosecutor, encouraged further threats to the peace, and invited a continuation for acts of aggression on the part of a designated terrorist organization.

The world can only wonder if the ICC had the aim of furthering the criminal activity to breach the border → or promote the criminal purpose of the HAMAS, where such activity or purpose involves the commission of a crime within the jurisdiction of the ICC itself. Obviously, the Prosecutor cannot prosecute itself.

Most Respectfully,
R

Has Israel filed a complaint with the ICC?

If you did not catch this news the first time.......

IDF reservists to file complaint against Hamas, PLO to ICC

Good luck with that. Those talking points have already been debunked.

Talking points? What total BS still coming from you.
But that's ok. Israel STILL exists.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestinians Massing At The Israeli Border
⁜→ Sixties Fan, et al,

I cannot understand how the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC)(Fatou Bensouda) can hold and credibility at all by demonstrating the preconceived notion (by publicly warning that those responsible for the killing of Palestinians near the Gaza border) that Israel is responsible for the attack on the border barrier, and might be prosecuted by the ICC. What good is the Office of the Prosecutor if they are just going to prosecute the popular villain, instead of the actual Jihadist designated as a Terrorist Organization and that organized the March.

It only demonstrates how utterly corrupt the Prosecutor's Office is when it encourages the Protestors to storm the border using the great number of civilians to mask terrorist infiltration. That is a clear violation of Rule 97 of the Customary and International Humanitarian Law (“utilizing the presence of a civilian or other protected person to render certain points, areas or military forces immune from military operations” constitutes a war crime in international armed conflicts"), ICC Statute, Article 8(2)(b)(xxiii).

Two incendiary balloons launched from Gaza explode in Israel

[/URL][/SIZE]

• Creates a regime of universal jurisdiction over the unlawful and intentional use of explosives and other lethal devices in, into, or against various defined public places with intent to kill or cause serious bodily injury, or with intent to cause extensive destruction of the public place.

View attachment 248698
​

I always find it rather funny that the Arab Palestinians, who claim to be the victim in the Great Return March would openly and so brazenly violate the international convention.

Any deaths involved, in my opinion, falls on the International Coordinating Committee (ie HAMAS) for the Great Return March.

◈◈ The Office of the Prosecutor, ICC, also should be charged with an unethical act in the execution of a duty that is not illegal but is improperly performed. It is an act through which the ICC intentionally makes the allegation that → for purposes other than bringing the designated terrorist organization to justice → damages the character of a nation that is defending its territorial integrity. This action, on the part of the ICC Prosecutor, encouraged further threats to the peace, and invited a continuation for acts of aggression on the part of a designated terrorist organization.

The world can only wonder if the ICC had the aim of furthering the criminal activity to breach the border → or promote the criminal purpose of the HAMAS, where such activity or purpose involves the commission of a crime within the jurisdiction of the ICC itself. Obviously, the Prosecutor cannot prosecute itself.

Most Respectfully,
R

Perhaps a similar protest against Egypt would be illegal because there is a border there.

 

[Sixties Fan]

RE: Palestinians Massing At The Israeli Border
⁜→ Sixties Fan, et al,

I cannot understand how the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC)(Fatou Bensouda) can hold and credibility at all by demonstrating the preconceived notion (by publicly warning that those responsible for the killing of Palestinians near the Gaza border) that Israel is responsible for the attack on the border barrier, and might be prosecuted by the ICC. What good is the Office of the Prosecutor if they are just going to prosecute the popular villain, instead of the actual Jihadist designated as a Terrorist Organization and that organized the March.

It only demonstrates how utterly corrupt the Prosecutor's Office is when it encourages the Protestors to storm the border using the great number of civilians to mask terrorist infiltration. That is a clear violation of Rule 97 of the Customary and International Humanitarian Law (“utilizing the presence of a civilian or other protected person to render certain points, areas or military forces immune from military operations” constitutes a war crime in international armed conflicts"), ICC Statute, Article 8(2)(b)(xxiii).

Two incendiary balloons launched from Gaza explode in Israel

[/URL][/SIZE]

• Creates a regime of universal jurisdiction over the unlawful and intentional use of explosives and other lethal devices in, into, or against various defined public places with intent to kill or cause serious bodily injury, or with intent to cause extensive destruction of the public place.

View attachment 248698
​

I always find it rather funny that the Arab Palestinians, who claim to be the victim in the Great Return March would openly and so brazenly violate the international convention.

Any deaths involved, in my opinion, falls on the International Coordinating Committee (ie HAMAS) for the Great Return March.

◈◈ The Office of the Prosecutor, ICC, also should be charged with an unethical act in the execution of a duty that is not illegal but is improperly performed. It is an act through which the ICC intentionally makes the allegation that → for purposes other than bringing the designated terrorist organization to justice → damages the character of a nation that is defending its territorial integrity. This action, on the part of the ICC Prosecutor, encouraged further threats to the peace, and invited a continuation for acts of aggression on the part of a designated terrorist organization.

The world can only wonder if the ICC had the aim of furthering the criminal activity to breach the border → or promote the criminal purpose of the HAMAS, where such activity or purpose involves the commission of a crime within the jurisdiction of the ICC itself. Obviously, the Prosecutor cannot prosecute itself.

Most Respectfully,
R

Perhaps a similar protest against Egypt would be illegal because there is a border there.

They are not protesting against Egypt because it is already a Muslim Country and they do not want to destroy it out of existence .
But the Muslim Brotherhood did try, for a year, to be in control of Egypt .......and nearly destroyed it anyway.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestinians Massing At The Israeli Border
⁜→ Sixties Fan, et al,

I cannot understand how the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC)(Fatou Bensouda) can hold and credibility at all by demonstrating the preconceived notion (by publicly warning that those responsible for the killing of Palestinians near the Gaza border) that Israel is responsible for the attack on the border barrier, and might be prosecuted by the ICC. What good is the Office of the Prosecutor if they are just going to prosecute the popular villain, instead of the actual Jihadist designated as a Terrorist Organization and that organized the March.

It only demonstrates how utterly corrupt the Prosecutor's Office is when it encourages the Protestors to storm the border using the great number of civilians to mask terrorist infiltration. That is a clear violation of Rule 97 of the Customary and International Humanitarian Law (“utilizing the presence of a civilian or other protected person to render certain points, areas or military forces immune from military operations” constitutes a war crime in international armed conflicts"), ICC Statute, Article 8(2)(b)(xxiii).

Two incendiary balloons launched from Gaza explode in Israel

[/URL][/SIZE]

• Creates a regime of universal jurisdiction over the unlawful and intentional use of explosives and other lethal devices in, into, or against various defined public places with intent to kill or cause serious bodily injury, or with intent to cause extensive destruction of the public place.

View attachment 248698
​

I always find it rather funny that the Arab Palestinians, who claim to be the victim in the Great Return March would openly and so brazenly violate the international convention.

Any deaths involved, in my opinion, falls on the International Coordinating Committee (ie HAMAS) for the Great Return March.

◈◈ The Office of the Prosecutor, ICC, also should be charged with an unethical act in the execution of a duty that is not illegal but is improperly performed. It is an act through which the ICC intentionally makes the allegation that → for purposes other than bringing the designated terrorist organization to justice → damages the character of a nation that is defending its territorial integrity. This action, on the part of the ICC Prosecutor, encouraged further threats to the peace, and invited a continuation for acts of aggression on the part of a designated terrorist organization.

The world can only wonder if the ICC had the aim of furthering the criminal activity to breach the border → or promote the criminal purpose of the HAMAS, where such activity or purpose involves the commission of a crime within the jurisdiction of the ICC itself. Obviously, the Prosecutor cannot prosecute itself.

Most Respectfully,
R

Perhaps a similar protest against Egypt would be illegal because there is a border there.

They are not protesting against Egypt because it is already a Muslim Country and they do not want to destroy it out of existence .
But the Muslim Brotherhood did try, for a year, to be in control of Egypt .......and nearly destroyed it anyway.

Egypt is a foreign country.They are not at war with Egypt.