What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.

Hollie

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
41,611
Reaction score
5,875
Points
1,830
Israel never misses an opportunity to miss an opportunity. During the Mandate period, they were offered a single state solution. It was rejected. After the '67 war, Israel was offered a single state solution. It was rejected. Many pushed for a two state solution, but anyone with an IQ above room temperature knew that was never going to happen.

There are only two options left. Single state or apartheid.
That long, tedious copy and paste doesn't address why Isrealis would have any reason to abandon their first-world economy and society in favor of a single state drenched in retrograde Islamists.
 
OP
P F Tinmore

P F Tinmore

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
63,553
Reaction score
3,001
Points
1,815

Abby Martin: Israeli War Crimes Against Palestinians, an In-Depth Look 'Gaza Fights For Freedom'​


 

Hollie

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
41,611
Reaction score
5,875
Points
1,830

Abby Martin: Israeli War Crimes Against Palestinians, an In-Depth Look 'Gaza Fights For Freedom'​


Actually, no, dear. Islamic ideology brings freedom for no one. The brutush, fascist, all-consuming politico-religious ideology has never brought freedom.


The main points of the Hamas charter:

The conflict with Israeli is religious and political: The Palestinian problem
is a religious-political Muslim problem and the conflict with Israel is between
Muslims and the Jewish “infidels.”

All Palestine is Muslim land and no one has the right to give it up: The
land of Palestine is sacred Muslim land and no one, including Arab rulers, has
the authority to give up any of it.

The importance of jihad (holy war) as the main means for the Islamic
Resistance Movement (Hamas) to achieve its goals: An uncompromising jihad must be waged against Israel and any agreement recognizing its right to exist must be totally opposed. Jihad is the personal duty of every Muslim.
 

ILOVEISRAEL

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
5,076
Reaction score
743
Points
160
Good point. Why should they give most of their country to colonial settlers?

When two or more parties " negotiate" about anything; Whether it be Countries, Companies, etc. etc. each party hopes to get something out of it.
Tell us please why it's in Israel's best interest to come to a mutual solution
Israel was offered a One State Solution? Link, please


Readers React: Why Israel can never accept a one-state solution

Tell us please if Israel was desperate enough to do it was assurances would they be given that they would have a say in any form of Gov't starting at even the local level

Last but not least, the Palestinians would have full control over Jewish Sacred and Religious Sites
 

ILOVEISRAEL

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
5,076
Reaction score
743
Points
160
Israel never misses an opportunity to miss an opportunity. During the Mandate period, they were offered a single state solution. It was rejected. After the '67 war, Israel was offered a single state solution. It was rejected. Many pushed for a two state solution, but anyone with an IQ above room temperature knew that was never going to happen.

There are only two options left. Single state or apartheid.

The Arabs initiated the War to destroy Israel. Israel won. Please tell us why Israel was " offered" this deal or better yet why they should have accepted giving up their State so it could be taken over by those who tried to destroy it
Links to both, please
 
OP
P F Tinmore

P F Tinmore

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
63,553
Reaction score
3,001
Points
1,815

The changing role of Palestine in Canadian politics​


 

RoccoR

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
11,042
Reaction score
3,066
Points
290
Location
Reynoldsburg, OH
RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
SUBTOPIC: Absent an Alternative Solutions
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: Well, I'm not sure who you are implying as being mentally deficient; but, this statement here is both ambiguous and expansive in time → to a degree → three generations beyond the UN Recommendations for the implementation of a Two-State Solution and the establishment of an International City State. In fact, you could not adequately describe the political atmosphere of a single generation in the three sentences you offer here as being remotely of any intellectual value.


◈ Who offered, with any credible authority, a Single-State Solution to Israel?
◈ Again, the Mandate Period being between 1922 - 1948, who made an offer to Israel (which only came into existence in 1948) what Single-State Solution?
◈ And again, after the Six-Day War, WHO made an offer of a Single-State Solution?

Israel never misses an opportunity to miss an opportunity. During the Mandate period, they were offered a single state solution. It was rejected. After the '67 war, Israel was offered a single state solution. It was rejected. Many pushed for a two state solution, but anyone with an IQ above room temperature knew that was never going to happen.

There are only two options left. Single state or apartheid.
(COMMENT)
.
It is a very strange notion, altogether, that there are only two possibilities that remain:

◈ Single-State Solution
◈ Apartheid (astonishing!)

Who in the hell would not recognize this as a dilemma of a false premise → as of a false dichotomy → as a fallacy. There have to be more than two possibilities; even, if it is the status quo of a regional conflict. Theoretically, there must be the additional possibility of a Thee-State Solution.

It is important that the Quartet
(United Nations, United States, European Union, and Russia Federation) or its successor, be able to think beyond this two-premise limitation.

AND → it is extremely important that the Quartet be able to advance beyond the nonsense of "apartheid" - that being a Red Mediterranean Sunfish (
I would say Red Herring, but the most common fish in the Region is the Sunfish)(a little humor there).

Crimes Against Humanity • [/FONT]Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court[FONT=arial] said:
"The crime of apartheid" means inhumane acts of a character similar to those referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime;
SOURCE LINK


As you all know (you don't have to be a "Rocket Scientist" to recognize that citizenship in Israel is many times more diverse than that of the territories under discussion. I think even those scholars at the White House could figure that out. The Arab Palestinian claim of "Apartheid" is merely an attempt to apply a despicable label to the Israelis. But, intellectually, it has no real value. It sticks only because the users do not know the definition of the claim. It has nothing to do with the truth. There is no single racial group on the Israeli side of the sovereign boundary trying to oppress a racial group on the Palestinian side of the boundary. And being Israeli is NOT a racial group.

1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,

R
 

ILOVEISRAEL

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
5,076
Reaction score
743
Points
160
RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
SUBTOPIC: Absent an Alternative Solutions
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: Well, I'm not sure who you are implying as being mentally deficient; but, this statement here is both ambiguous and expansive in time → to a degree → three generations beyond the UN Recommendations for the implementation of a Two-State Solution and the establishment of an International City State. In fact, you could not adequately describe the political atmosphere of a single generation in the three sentences you offer here as being remotely of any intellectual value.


◈ Who offered, with any credible authority, a Single-State Solution to Israel?
◈ Again, the Mandate Period being between 1922 - 1948, who made an offer to Israel (which only came into existence in 1948) what Single-State Solution?
◈ And again, after the Six-Day War, WHO made an offer of a Single-State Solution?


(COMMENT)
.
It is a very strange notion, altogether, that there are only two possibilities that remain:


◈ Single-State Solution
◈ Apartheid (astonishing!)

Who in the hell would not recognize this as a dilemma of a false premise → as of a false dichotomy → as a fallacy. There have to be more than two possibilities; even, if it is the status quo of a regional conflict. Theoretically, there must be the additional possibility of a Thee-State Solution.

It is important that the Quartet
(United Nations, United States, European Union, and Russia Federation) or its successor, be able to think beyond this two-premise limitation.

AND → it is extremely important that the Quartet be able to advance beyond the nonsense of "apartheid" - that being a Red Mediterranean Sunfish (
I would say Red Herring, but the most common fish in the Region is the Sunfish)(a little humor there).




As you all know (you don't have to be a "Rocket Scientist" to recognize that citizenship in Israel is many times more diverse than that of the territories under discussion. I think even those scholars at the White House could figure that out. The Arab Palestinian claim of "Apartheid" is merely an attempt to apply a despicable label to the Israelis. But, intellectually, it has no real value. It sticks only because the users do not know the definition of the claim. It has nothing to do with the truth. There is no single racial group on the Israeli side of the sovereign boundary trying to oppress a racial group on the Palestinian side of the boundary. And being Israeli is NOT a racial group.

1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,

R
This is the first time I realize he is totally delusional; especially his claim that a SINGLE STATE solution was offered AFTER the 67 War!
Why would the Israelis even consider such a thing knowing that those who would be the majority are their Worst enemies!
Who would be in charge of this “ State?” Being such a minority, how can the Israelis be assured their religious rights would be protected especially having access to their religious sites? There will be no response
 

Hollie

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
41,611
Reaction score
5,875
Points
1,830
This is the first time I realize he is totally delusional; especially his claim that a SINGLE STATE solution was offered AFTER the 67 War!
Why would the Israelis even consider such a thing knowing that those who would be the majority are their Worst enemies!
Who would be in charge of this “ State?” Being such a minority, how can the Israelis be assured their religious rights would be protected especially having access to their religious sites? There will be no response
There's a pattern here. Ten years of the delusional claim about the Treaty of Lausanne inventing the "country of Pal'istan", which it did not, along with claimed "new states", none of which exist.

It's best just to leave him to his cut and paste youtube videos.
 
OP
P F Tinmore

P F Tinmore

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
63,553
Reaction score
3,001
Points
1,815

Reclaiming Arab Judaism with Hadar Cohen​


 

ILOVEISRAEL

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
5,076
Reaction score
743
Points
160
OP
P F Tinmore

P F Tinmore

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
63,553
Reaction score
3,001
Points
1,815

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$70.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top