rosends
Gold Member
- Oct 19, 2012
- 5,769
- 1,963
- 198
Can you show me those laws, please. TIA.Not so. The Zionists had laws against hiring Arab labor.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can you show me those laws, please. TIA.Not so. The Zionists had laws against hiring Arab labor.
Not true. Simply not true.Not so. The Zionists had laws against hiring Arab labor.
What kind of bizarre fantasy world do you live in? Are you seriously trying to argue that the civil war consisted of Jew+Arab residents on the one side and Jew+Arab immigrants on the other side? That the division was between those who lived there pre-WWI and those who lived there after WWI? That the problem of self-determination is not between ethnic Jews and ethnic Arabs, but who was born there and who moved there? As if THAT is the conflict?So, the "two groups" you speak about were the natives and the foreign colonial settlers.
The establishment of the State of Israel is not in anyway "imperial exploitation". Britain isn't benefiting from the resources scraped out of the territory or the exploitation of the people living there. Israel has developed the territory for the well-being of its native and indigenous people. So all this is irrelevant."Primarily, two elements formed the core of the Mandate System, the principle of non-annexation of the territory on the one hand and its administration as a "sacred trust of civilisation" on the other ... The principle of administration as a "sacred trust of civilisation" was designed to prevent a practice of imperial exploitation of the mandated territory in contrast to former colonial habits. Instead, the Mandatory's administration should assist in developing the territory for the well-being of its native people."