- Dec 6, 2009
- Reaction score
(COMMENT)Breaking Down Israeli Lies
They just don't get it that Israel has the capability to annihilate the Palestinians but lack the desire whereas the Palestinians have the desire to annihilate the Israeli's but lack the capability. Long overdo for Israel to stop placating Palestinian demands & treat them like their own Arab brothers do who know the Palestinians best.RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
SUBTOPIC: Absent an Alternative
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
BLUF: This (Media Dramatization) is a complete and utter fallacy of inaccurate or manipulated information that is presented with the intention to deceive the target audience.
View attachment 535579
The Commentator and Host slings around terms like "murder" • "ethnic cleansing" • and • "genocide" as if the Israeli-Palestine Conflict could possibly be compared to the WWII Holocaust or the Hutu • Tutsi Conflict. Nothing could be farther from the truth. If there is an act of eradication, it is nothing less than the total destruction of the truth by the pro-Palestinians and anti-Israeli • drama queens that author this crap.
A Palestinian View of the IHRA Definition
YAWN.... " Right of Return" will never happen. Knock yourself out
I never said that.
As usual, Tinmore is lying. He's trying to convince people that those who accuse others of Antisemitism object to criticism about Israel. The individual who is speaking is a Palestinian who lives in London
Just ONE example
Let's assume one object to Israel's politics. Is that any reason to attack a innocent person , paint reminders of the Holocaust, etc, etc? Tinmore will have a " reasonable explanation" A little while ago he claimed there was no Antisemitism in Canada and I called him on it.
"Their country"?Good point. Why should they give most of their country to colonial settlers?
Please tell us why Israel should “ come to the table” knowing what the end goal is with being denied access to their Holy Sites?Good point. Why should they give most of their country to colonial settlers?
Israel never misses an opportunity to miss an opportunity. During the Mandate period, they were offered a single state solution. It was rejected. After the '67 war, Israel was offered a single state solution. It was rejected. Many pushed for a two state solution, but anyone with an IQ above room temperature knew that was never going to happen.Please tell us why Israel should “ come to the table” knowing what the end goal is with being denied access to their Holy Sites?
Why would they purposefully put themselves in a worse situation then they were before 1967?