rylah
Gold Member
- Jun 10, 2015
- 21,510
- 4,601
- 290
That is hard to say. International law is a web of laws derived from treaties and practices. Sometimes there is a convention that will define and codify this loose swath of laws. Sometimes there will be a resolution, like resolution 194, that will draw from these laws to address a particular problem.RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
Palestine Conciliation Commission (PCC)
The UN Charter is a binding agreement between the members that are signatories to it. And thus, it is equivalent under Treaty Law as a binding between members. It has no international standing beyond the 193 sovereign states. AND! Palestine is an observer BUT NOT a member, and not obligated. BUT! The UN does not make law. This is a key point and a principle reason to remember why your answer is completely wrong.
(COMMENT)Resolution 194 was written in compliance with already existing international law.◈ When did the Right of Return become an International Law?
✪ A/RES/194 (III) of 11 December 1948 is NOT LAW.
What preexisting law are you eluding to? You cannot answer that. If you could, you would have cited it.
Most Respectfully,
R
I have posted before a talk by Dr. Susan Akram. She is a professor of international law and practices immigration and refugee law.
All that sophistry and still no actual law because it's all blowing hot air,
you keep beating about Res. 194 but it was rejected by the Arab League.
The same as in 50 years you'll suggest citing the Trump Plan as a legal title to something,
after totally rejecting it, exactly as Arabs do today with the Olmert Plan, 30 years later...
Typical detachment from reality.