Palestine and Jerusalem belong to Muslims

Mohammad was a murderous warlord who had sex with children. He cobbled together elements of other religions in such a way as to create a political manifesto that implored his equally violent followers to perform his bidding.

He was not a prophet and was merely a conniving egomaniac looking for a way to bind his followers to him by creating a bunch of Mumbo Jumbo that placed himself as the spokesperson for God.

If there is a God, and God were to have selected a spokesperson, it certainly wouldn't be a cold-blooded murderer who screwed children.
irrelevant...its 2015...deal with it





2.5 billion souls on Planet Earth believe in the false prophet who murdered raped and thieved his way to glory, even in 2015. So no it is not irrelevant and you need to deal with it or it could be you facing the muslim hordes next
 
Therefore the missions of all 123 999 prophets ended,

Only according to hadith with weak silsila chains; once again, you're getting the basics wrong while pretending to be a religious scholar. Islam deserves better than that.
 
Hello,

I am Muslim. .....

I don't know what the **** you are, but intelligent or credible you are not. As long as there are stupid pieces of shit like you who clam that "X land is muslim", as in the lunatic notion of dar al islam, there will be endless war in the mideast. The death cult of islam leads one down a path of insanity, hatred, and psychosis, and as such should be eradicated from the face of the earth.
 
there needs to be more Muslim leaders like this guy:

Jordan's ‘Zionist Sheikh’ Cites Quranic Sources for Islam-Jewish Relations

A Jordanian Quranic scholar, and former postal worker, cited the Quranic sources that affirm Islam and Judaism should have friendly relations and that ‘Palestine’ should be for Jews, according to an interview published by Israel’s Mida magazine....

#1- does that guy really exist? He sounds way, way too smart to be a muslim

#2-if such a man existed, is he still alive, because knowing how muslims are - he probably won't be for long.
 
there needs to be more Muslim leaders like this guy:

Jordan's ‘Zionist Sheikh’ Cites Quranic Sources for Islam-Jewish Relations

A Jordanian Quranic scholar, and former postal worker, cited the Quranic sources that affirm Islam and Judaism should have friendly relations and that ‘Palestine’ should be for Jews, according to an interview published by Israel’s Mida magazine....

#1- does that guy really exist? He sounds way, way too smart to be a muslim

#2-if such a man existed, is he still alive, because knowing how muslims are - he probably won't be for long.

He does exist and he's in Jordan. You're right, in many Muslim countries he'd already be dead.
 
Therefore the missions of all 123 999 prophets ended,

Only according to hadith with weak silsila chains; once again, you're getting the basics wrong while pretending to be a religious scholar. Islam deserves better than that.

Actually Muslim75 would be considered a moderate Muslim. The ones who are getting the basics right are ISIS and Al Queda.
 
Actually Muslim75 would be considered a moderate Muslim. The ones who are getting the basics right are ISIS and Al Queda.

Says someone who doesn't even know what the basics are :wink:

Sorry I only lived and grew up in a Muslim country. ISIS and Al Queda are practicing true Sunni Islam. Iran's Mullah's are practicing true Shia Islam. In fact that's exactly what they are both saying. I don't understsnd what all the confusion is all about.

When Ayatollah Khomeini rose to power in 1979, he specifically said that he's there to establish and export pure Islam. ISIS's leader, who is a devout cleric makes the same claims, they are establishing AN ISLAMIC STATE. What's misunderstanding here?
 
15th post
Sorry I only lived and grew up in a Muslim country.

I've heard you say this many times, and yet you can't 1.) name the country and 2.) you continuously get very basic things incorrect, such as in the thread where we discussed Yemen and you thought that the Sahih Bukhari was part of the Quran. No one with even a passing knowledge of the basics of Islam would make that mistake. No one. So even if you did spend some time in a Muslim country you obviously never studied the religion at all.

ISIS and Al Queda are practicing true Sunni Islam.

That's interesting since they consider each other rather heretical. It doesn't make sense to say that they are BOTH practicing true Sunni Islam when the way that they practice it is so different from each other and indeed opposed to each other.

Iran's Mullah's are practicing true Shia Islam. In fact that's exactly what they are both saying. I don't understsnd what all the confusion is all about.

Iran's council is by far one of the weakest Shia theological institutions in the world. Shia centers of theology tend to surround Qom and Najaf. Historically speaking and theologically speaking, Iran's political shia model goes against classical Shia Islam and is a relatively new expression on the faith.

When Ayatollah Khomeini rose to power in 1979, he specifically said that he's there to establish and export pure Islam. ISIS's leader, who is a devout cleric makes the same claims, they are establishing AN ISLAMIC STATE. What's misunderstanding here?

And Joseph Kony insists that he is establishing a Christian state based on the ten commandments as he has his children soldiers rape their families. These people saying such things doesn't mean that they are legit. You seem to rather be succumbing to the propaganda of these radical groups.
 
you
Sorry I only lived and grew up in a Muslim country.

I've heard you say this many times, and yet you can't 1.) name the country and 2.) you continuously get very basic things incorrect, such as in the thread where we discussed Yemen and you thought that the Sahih Bukhari was part of the Quran. No one with even a passing knowledge of the basics of Islam would make that mistake. No one. So even if you did spend some time in a Muslim country you obviously never studied the religion at all.

ISIS and Al Queda are practicing true Sunni Islam.

That's interesting since they consider each other rather heretical. It doesn't make sense to say that they are BOTH practicing true Sunni Islam when the way that they practice it is so different from each other and indeed opposed to each other.

Iran's Mullah's are practicing true Shia Islam. In fact that's exactly what they are both saying. I don't understsnd what all the confusion is all about.

Iran's council is by far one of the weakest Shia theological institutions in the world. Shia centers of theology tend to surround Qom and Najaf. Historically speaking and theologically speaking, Iran's political shia model goes against classical Shia Islam and is a relatively new expression on the faith.

When Ayatollah Khomeini rose to power in 1979, he specifically said that he's there to establish and export pure Islam. ISIS's leader, who is a devout cleric makes the same claims, they are establishing AN ISLAMIC STATE. What's misunderstanding here?

And Joseph Kony insists that he is establishing a Christian state based on the ten commandments as he has his children soldiers rape their families. These people saying such things doesn't mean that they are legit. You seem to rather be succumbing to the propaganda of these radical groups.

Have no right to personal information. You should not be asking and it is not permitted to discuss such things beyond what a poster chooses to reveal. You are not permitted to use any person information to attack, defame or harm the poster in any way.

It is none of your d$%* business!
 
Have no right to personal information. You should not be asking and it is not permitted to discuss such things beyond what a poster chooses to reveal. You are not permitted to use any person information to attack, defame or harm the poster in any way.

It is none of your d$%* business!

I did not claim a right to personal information. Take a couple of deep breaths and try again.
 
Have no right to personal information. You should not be asking and it is not permitted to discuss such things beyond what a poster chooses to reveal. You are not permitted to use any person information to attack, defame or harm the poster in any way.

It is none of your d$%* business!

I did not claim a right to personal information. Take a couple of deep breaths and try again.
You criticized Roudy for not telling you where he grew up. Why is that important to you? Are you an internet stalker ?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom