Closure of Al-Aqsa mosque for first time by IOF terrorists

[Churchill]

No, they didn't change. Just because Smotrich said something, doesn't make it true.

Why don't you believe him?

That's not how international law works. Sheesh.

Yes it's illegal I know, but so what? Smotrich doesn't care about that,

Oy vey!

Israel's borders have never changed.

Smotrich would give you an argument there, and he's a Knesset member and you're not.

Stop being Silly, Israel knew Hezbollah would attack if Israel attacked Iran. They wanted that, that gives them a pretext to invade South Lebanon, ethnically cleanse a million human beings and then Annex it.

So when the war ends, Israel has a net gain in territory and no UN resolution will force it out of South Lebanon because the US would veto any such resolution, you seem quite new to all this.

 

[Shusha]

Why don't you believe him?

Because Smotrich does not have the capacity to change the border of a State. Do you know what does?

...that gives them a pretext to invade South Lebanon

They didn't need the Iran pretext. The violation by Lebanon of the ceasefire agreement is enough of a legal reason.

ethnically cleanse a million human beings

Evacuation of civilians is not ethnic cleansing. Don't be silly.

and then Annex it.

So when the war ends, Israel has a net gain in territory and no UN resolution will force it out of South Lebanon because the US would veto any such resolution,

See? You are accusing Israel of things that happen in the future. You can't convict someone of an illegal act if they haven't committed that act. And you also can't convict a state of an illegal act because some extremist (even one in the government) makes some stupid statement.

you seem quite new to all this.

I'm not biting on the personal insults. My posting history isn't a secret.

 

[Deadstick]

No, they didn't change. Just because Smotrich said something, doesn't make it true. That's not how international law works. Sheesh.

Israel's borders have never changed.

You have the nerve to talk about international law

 

[Deadstick]

Why don't you believe him?

Yes it's illegal I know, but so what? Smotrich doesn't care about that,

Oy vey!


Smotrich would give you an argument there, and he's a Knesset member and you're not.

Stop being Silly, Israel knew Hezbollah would attack if Israel attacked Iran. They wanted that, that gives them a pretext to invade South Lebanon, ethnically cleanse a million human beings and then Annex it.

So when the war ends, Israel has a net gain in territory and no UN resolution will force it out of South Lebanon because the US would veto any such resolution, you seem quite new to all this.

Well they should remember what happened last time in 2006, they went home crying to Mama.

 

[Deadstick]

My you're so smart. Look at my sig line, that's how 'smart' you are.

What are you barking about?

 

[Churchill]

Because Smotrich does not have the capacity to change the border of a State. Do you know what does?

He has considerable influence, there is no authority that can prevent Israel annexing like this.

They didn't need the Iran pretext. The violation by Lebanon of the ceasefire agreement is enough of a legal reason.

Who said "need"? It was an ideal time to do it while the world's eyes are on the Gulf.

Evacuation of civilians is not ethnic cleansing. Don't be silly.

It is when we hear government members saying they intend to expand the border, evacuations are temporary the words from people in Israel's government is that this is not temporary.

See? You are accusing Israel of things that happen in the future. You can't convict someone of an illegal act if they haven't committed that act. And you also can't convict a state of an illegal act because some extremist (even one in the government) makes some stupid statement.

I made no accusation. I said if the Israelis chose to annex South Lebanon, then nobody can stop them.

I'm not biting on the personal insults. My posting history isn't a secret.

Smotrich so far is the only person saying this publicly, I am confident there are many more saying it privately.

 

[Kruska]

No, they didn't change. Just because Smotrich said something, doesn't make it true. That's not how international law works. Sheesh.

Israel's borders have never changed.

A Zionist referencing about "International Law"

You still haven't come up with a British map - that would have confirmed a Jewish territory solely for Jews.
Which naturally you can't - since the British revoked the whole idea of a Jewish state.

A British White Paper, or government policy document, prepared by Secretary of State for the Colonies Malcolm MacDonald and published on 21 May 1939. Following the conclusions of the Peel and Woodhead Commissions and discussions at the St. James Conference, as well as the ongoing Arab Revolt , the paper rejected the idea of partition and suggested the establishment within 10 years of an independent state in Palestine, with Arabs and Jews sharing the government.

Land Transaction Laws 1940

Land Transfers Regulations (1940)

Land Transfers Regulations (1940) at ECF.org's interactive database

ecf.org.il

Regulations enacted by the British High Commissioner for Palestine, Harold MacMichael, on 28 February 1940. They were enacted in implementation of the policies contained in the 1939 White Paper on Palestine, and were considered to have come into force on 18 May 1939. Two zones were defined under the regulations, Zone A and Zone B, consisting of about 63% and 32% of the territory of Palestine respectively. In Zone A, the sale of lands to non-Arabs would be mostly forbidden, and in Zone B allowed only with the approval of the High Commissioner. This left roughly 5% of Palestine open to unrestricted purchase of land by Jews, along the coast and in Jerusalem. The regulations were met with strong resistance from the Jewish community.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Prof Jiang has a theory that the IDF is rigging the Al Aqsa Mosque like it was 7WTC and will blame it on an Iranian missile when they detonate it

 

[Deadstick]

Prof Jiang has a theory that the IDF is rigging the Al Aqsa Mosque like it was 7WTC and will blame it on an Iranian missile when they detonate it

They are capable of anything, meanwhile looks like Trump is looking for that off ramp talking about talks with the Iranians that never took place, no matter what happens with Trump i hope the Iranians carry on against Israel until it's finished otherwise the Israelis will never stop attacking.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

They are capable of anything, meanwhile looks like Trump is looking for that off ramp talking about talks with the Iranians that never took place, no matter what happens with Trump i hope the Iranians carry on against Israel until it's finished otherwise the Israelis will never stop attacking.

I really think Jared called him and pretended to be Iran

 

[Deadstick]

Meanwhile in London three people set fire to some Jewish Ambulances and the gas tanks exploded, could be a false flag or just Vandalizm who knows, i mean it's not like the Medics were executed in cold blood then buried inside their Ambulance in the desert.

 

[Shusha]

You have the nerve to talk about international law

Sure do. And someone has to.

 

[Shusha]

I made no accusation. I said if the Israelis chose to annex South Lebanon, then nobody can stop them.

Well, let's reserve judgement until something happens. Since Israel has never asserted sovereignty over any territory to which she does not have the legal claim, there is no reason to suspect she will. (Unless, you know..)

 

[Shusha]

You still haven't come up with a British map

I have. And have provided a legal case for it. And named the documents outlining this legal case. You just don't like the answer.

- that would have confirmed a Jewish territory solely for Jews.

I've never said a territory "solely for Jews". Don't misrepresent what I've claimed.

Which naturally you can't - since the British revoked the whole idea of a Jewish state.

Oh lookie! You've finally done your research and came up with the name of a document that you couldn't name a few days ago. Good for you.

A British White Paper, or government policy document, prepared by Secretary of State for the Colonies Malcolm MacDonald and published on 21 May 1939. Following the conclusions of the Peel and Woodhead Commissions and discussions at the St. James Conference, as well as the ongoing Arab Revolt , the paper rejected the idea of partition and suggested the establishment within 10 years of an independent state in Palestine, with Arabs and Jews sharing the government.

You mean like the current State of Israel? If partition was rejected -- then it is one State. Undivided. Like I said.

 

[Kruska]

I have. And have provided a legal case for it. And named the documents outlining this legal case. You just don't like the answer.

Bullshit - Liar

I've never said a territory "solely for Jews". Don't misrepresent what I've claimed.

Bullshit - Liar, you even claimed ALL of British Palestine as of 1946 was to be SOLELY Jewish

Oh lookie! You've finally done your research and came up with the name of a document that you couldn't name a few days ago. Good for you.

Bullshit - Liar,- that document is for YOU - since you don't even know what you talk about, and came up with NOTHING but bull.

You mean like the current State of Israel? If partition was rejected -- then it is one State. Undivided. Like I said.

Bullshit - Liar,- you solely referred to British Palestine as of 1946 - upon Jordan being separated as a sovereign nation.

Read my signature - and get lost, you pathetic bullshitter and Liar.

 

[Shusha]

Bullshit - Liar

Bullshit - Liar, you even claimed ALL of British Palestine as of 1946 was to be SOLELY Jewish

Bullshit - Liar,- that document is for YOU - since you don't even know what you talk about, and came up with NOTHING but bull.

Bullshit - Liar,- you solely referred to British Palestine as of 1946 - upon Jordan being separated as a sovereign nation.

Read my signature - and get lost, you pathetic bullshitter and Liar.

What no red script? I'm disappointed.

 

[Shusha]

Bullshit - Liar, you even claimed ALL of British Palestine as of 1946 was to be SOLELY Jewish

I did not. I said that Western Palestine (after the legal removal of Trans-Jordan from the Mandate) has become the State of Israel. As required by the legal document of the Mandate for Palestine. As a fulfillment of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations. In accordance with the Montevideo Convention. Within the customary law of the concept of uti possidetis juris. Accepted by the UN as a member-state. With boundaries confirmed in peace treaties with the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and with the Arab Republic of Egypt.

Bullshit - Liar,- you solely referred to British Palestine as of 1946 - upon Jordan being separated as a sovereign nation.

Dude. There are only two options here. Either the western portion of the British Mandate is legally one, undivided, single territorial unit OR the territory has been legally partitioned. You can't have it both ways. Its one or the other. My argument is that it has never LEGALLY been divided and that no new boundaries have been created within the territorial integrity of the western portion of the British Mandate. It remains one territorial unit according to law.

There are two common arguments for partition.

1. UNGA resolution. Non-binding. Rejected by the Arabs. Never became a legal reality.

2. The 1949 Armistice Line. Created after an illegal invasion of force by States with no legal right to any of that territory (Jordan and Egypt) and was explicitly prevented from becoming a legal boundary by the legal document itself.

Choose your poison. Is the Western Mandate for Palestine ONE territorial unit, or is it more than one? Claim your position and defend it.

 

[Kruska]

I did not. I said that Western Palestine (after the legal removal of Trans-Jordan from the Mandate) has become the State of Israel. As required by the legal document of the Mandate for Palestine. As a fulfillment of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations. In accordance with the Montevideo Convention. Within the customary law of the concept of uti possidetis juris. Accepted by the UN as a member-state. With boundaries confirmed in peace treaties with the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and with the Arab Republic of Egypt.

Dude. There are only two options here. Either the western portion of the British Mandate is legally one, undivided, single territorial unit OR the territory has been legally partitioned. You can't have it both ways. Its one or the other. My argument is that it has never LEGALLY been divided and that no new boundaries have been created within the territorial integrity of the western portion of the British Mandate. It remains one territorial unit according to law.

There are two common arguments for partition.

1. UNGA resolution. Non-binding. Rejected by the Arabs. Never became a legal reality.

2. The 1949 Armistice Line. Created after an illegal invasion of force by States with no legal right to any of that territory (Jordan and Egypt) and was explicitly prevented from becoming a legal boundary by the legal document itself.

Choose your poison. Is the Western Mandate for Palestine ONE territorial unit, or is it more than one? Claim your position and defend it.

Stop - LYING, and bringing up pure bull and evading the truth by bringing in new stories - simply read FACTS.

And FACT is - there was NEVER a territory outlined or specifically reserved for only Jews, holding any legal value.

A British White Paper, or government policy document, prepared by Secretary of State for the Colonies Malcolm MacDonald and published on 21 May 1939. Following the conclusions of the Peel and Woodhead Commissions and discussions at the St. James Conference, as well as the ongoing Arab Revolt , the paper rejected the idea of partition and suggested the establishment within 10 years of an independent state in Palestine, with Arabs and Jews sharing the government.

 

[Shusha]

Stop - LYING, and bringing up pure bull and evading the truth by bringing in new stories - simply read FACTS.

And FACT is - there was NEVER a territory outlined or specifically reserved for only Jews, holding any legal value.

A British White Paper, or government policy document, prepared by Secretary of State for the Colonies Malcolm MacDonald and published on 21 May 1939. Following the conclusions of the Peel and Woodhead Commissions and discussions at the St. James Conference, as well as the ongoing Arab Revolt , the paper rejected the idea of partition and suggested the establishment within 10 years of an independent state in Palestine, with Arabs and Jews sharing the government.

ONE territory or MORE than one, Kruska?

 

[Kruska]

ONE territory or MORE than one, Kruska?

Are you stupid? - or just some little kid who can't accept that no one gave him his own lolly.