Oy! Those Crafty Jews!

[ding]

That's your belief/opinion
I don't really care

Ezekiel 18:24: "But when a righteous person turns away from his righteousness and does injustice and does the same abominations that the wicked person does, shall he live? None of the righteous deeds that he has done shall be remembered; for the treachery of which he is guilty and the sin he has committed, he shall die."

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I believe in Jesus. You believe in Satan. Who’s right?

You can't believe in one without the other.

Your problem is you lack any credibility and you're treated as such. Now run along

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Ezekiel 18:24: "But when a righteous person turns away from his righteousness and does injustice and does the same abominations that the wicked person does, shall he live? None of the righteous deeds that he has done shall be remembered; for the treachery of which he is guilty and the sin he has committed, he shall die."

So? I said it's your opinion. Nothing more, nothing less

 

[gipper]

That's your belief/opinion
I don't really care

You better seek Jesus now to save your soul. It’s not too late.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

You better seek Jesus now to save your soul. It’s not too late.

Oh shut up already ya miserable Joo hating troll. How's that?

 

[ding]

So? I said it's your opinion. Nothing more, nothing less

Judaism views self-defense not only as a right, but as a strict obligation. Rooted in the Talmudic principle of rodef (the pursuer), the teaching mandates: "If someone comes to kill you, rise and kill him first" (Sanhedrin 72a). However, this right to self-preservation comes with distinct moral and legal limits: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

• Strict Proportionality: You may only use the minimum amount of force necessary to neutralize the threat. If an attacker can be stopped by disarming them or maiming a limb, using lethal force is considered a punishable transgression (Sanhedrin 74a). [1, 2, 3]
• Imminent Threat Requirement: Force is only justified when facing an immediate, active danger. For example, a homeowner can use lethal force against an intruder at night because a resident will naturally fight back, escalating the situation. However, if it is absolutely clear the intruder poses no danger (or if they are retreating), using lethal force becomes an act of bloodshed (Exodus 22:1-2). [1, 2, 3]
• The "Rule of the Red Blood": While you must protect your own life, you cannot intentionally murder an innocent third party to save yourself. The Talmud states, "How do you know that your blood is redder than his?"—meaning no one has the moral authority to calculate whose life is more valuable.

 

[gipper]

So? I said it's your opinion. Nothing more, nothing less

You can’t claim to be a Christian while supporting mass murder. Jesus doesn’t like that.

 

[rosends]

At least you admit to being like a rabid Nazi.

that doesn't follow from what you said. You mentioned that you thought I wouldn't answer questions from a rabid Nazi. I said I would so you now claim I'm a rabid Nazi? Every time I think "well at least he can think on the level of a # grader" you show me that I need a lower number.

 

[gipper]

Oh shut up already ya miserable Joo hating troll. How's that?

I’ll pray for your soul. I fear you’re destined for the bad place.

 

[gipper]

that doesn't follow from what you said. You mentioned that you thought I wouldn't answer questions from a rabid Nazi. I said I would so you now claim I'm a rabid Nazi? Every time I think "well at least he can think on the level of a # grader" you show me that I need a lower number.

You know full well. Stop lying.

 

[rosends]

You know full well. Stop lying.

I know that you are even younger than I thought? Thanks for confirming.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Judaism views self-defense not only as a right, but as a strict obligation. Rooted in the Talmudic principle of rodef (the pursuer), the teaching mandates: "If someone comes to kill you, rise and kill him first" (Sanhedrin 72a). However, this right to self-preservation comes with distinct moral and legal limits: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

• Strict Proportionality: You may only use the minimum amount of force necessary to neutralize the threat. If an attacker can be stopped by disarming them or maiming a limb, using lethal force is considered a punishable transgression (Sanhedrin 74a). [1, 2, 3]
• Imminent Threat Requirement: Force is only justified when facing an immediate, active danger. For example, a homeowner can use lethal force against an intruder at night because a resident will naturally fight back, escalating the situation. However, if it is absolutely clear the intruder poses no danger (or if they are retreating), using lethal force becomes an act of bloodshed (Exodus 22:1-2). [1, 2, 3]
• The "Rule of the Red Blood": While you must protect your own life, you cannot intentionally murder an innocent third party to save yourself. The Talmud states, "How do you know that your blood is redder than his?"—meaning no one has the moral authority to calculate whose life is more valuable.

You copy and paste well. No original thought reveals your weakness

 

[gipper]

Judaism views self-defense not only as a right, but as a strict obligation. Rooted in the Talmudic principle of rodef (the pursuer), the teaching mandates: "If someone comes to kill you, rise and kill him first" (Sanhedrin 72a). However, this right to self-preservation comes with distinct moral and legal limits: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

• Strict Proportionality: You may only use the minimum amount of force necessary to neutralize the threat. If an attacker can be stopped by disarming them or maiming a limb, using lethal force is considered a punishable transgression (Sanhedrin 74a). [1, 2, 3]
• Imminent Threat Requirement: Force is only justified when facing an immediate, active danger. For example, a homeowner can use lethal force against an intruder at night because a resident will naturally fight back, escalating the situation. However, if it is absolutely clear the intruder poses no danger (or if they are retreating), using lethal force becomes an act of bloodshed (Exodus 22:1-2). [1, 2, 3]
• The "Rule of the Red Blood": While you must protect your own life, you cannot intentionally murder an innocent third party to save yourself. The Talmud states, "How do you know that your blood is redder than his?"—meaning no one has the moral authority to calculate whose life is more valuable.

She’s a Zionist Christian who thinks Jesus approves of murdering innocent Muslims.

Can’t fix stupid.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

She’s a Zionist Christian who thinks Jesus approves of murdering innocent Muslims.

Can’t fix stupid.

Lol @ Zionist anything. What a dope

 

[gipper]

I know that you are even younger than I thought? Thanks for confirming.

Thank you.

At least I’m not a Zionist who supports mass murder of innocent people, as you do.

May God forgive your misguided soul.

 

[gipper]

Lol @ Zionist anything. What a dope

Now you deny it. Too late. God knows. Repent!!!!

 

[ding]

You copy and paste well. No original thought reveals your weakness

Israel has forgotten God. Israel does not trust God. That's why they have become what they hate.

 

[ding]

Lol @ Zionist anything. What a dope

They are laughing at you and would spit on you.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Israel has forgotten God. Israel does not trust God. That's why they have become what they hate.

If you say so...I suppose

 

[ding]

If you say so...I suppose