2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,969
- 52,237
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #21
I look at the parents being Civilly liable in not securing their weapon and ignoring the schools claim that their son was a threat.
Be difficult for a criminal charge to hold up unless they intentionally procured him a weapon knowing his intent
How did they ignore the school....they were apparently at a meeting with the principal the day of the attack...how do you know what they did or didn't do in response to any problem their child had.....?
There is a lot of ASSuming here........
And what about the school's responsibilty....we know from the Parkland shooting that they refused to press charges, numerous times, for serious felony behavior due to the obama policy, the Promise Program, of not prosecuting offenders......what did the school do or not do in the weeks leading up to the shooting....
This isn't as simple as people think.....and when idiots tell us we should believe what the D.A. says, after Rittenhouse and Jan. 6, that isn't going to work anymore....