Oregon imposes gag order on Christian bakers in gay wedding case

[PaintMyHouse]

The Christian baker sold cakes to anyone. No problem. The problem was created by the lezbos demanding special words be applied to the cake so the new law could be tested.

That is a total and complete lie... Sweet Cakes 5 things you should know about proposed BOLI order OregonLive.com

 

[Papageorgio]

The Christian baker sold cakes to anyone. No problem. The problem was created by the lezbos demanding special words be applied to the cake so the new law could be tested.

They informed the bakery that the cake was for two women, at that point the bakery refused to make the cake.

 

[Flash Farley]

The Christian baker sold cakes to anyone. No problem. The problem was created by the lezbos demanding special words be applied to the cake so the new law could be tested.

They informed the bakery that the cake was for two women, at that point the bakery refused to make the cake.

Lie. They said the cake was for their own wedding.

 

[Ravi]

The Christian baker sold cakes to anyone. No problem. The problem was created by the lezbos demanding special words be applied to the cake so the new law could be tested.

They informed the bakery that the cake was for two women, at that point the bakery refused to make the cake.

Lie. They said the cake was for their own wedding.

LOL, they are two women. They didn't ask for any special wording or even for a gay cake topper. They just asked for a wedding cake. Why do you need to make things up?

 

[Papageorgio]

The Christian baker sold cakes to anyone. No problem. The problem was created by the lezbos demanding special words be applied to the cake so the new law could be tested.

They informed the bakery that the cake was for two women, at that point the bakery refused to make the cake.

Lie. They said the cake was for their own wedding.

Which was two women. Where is the lie?

No special words were asked to be put on it.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The Christian baker sold cakes to anyone. No problem. The problem was created by the lezbos demanding special words be applied to the cake so the new law could be tested.

They informed the bakery that the cake was for two women, at that point the bakery refused to make the cake.

Lie. They said the cake was for their own wedding.

Read up, dummy. Dumbass even admits that when, during the cake tasting, he found out it was for gays he told them he wouldn't make the cake. It's in the public record.

 

[WorldWatcher]

That you call them names just proves that you would like to continue to victimize them.

Oh, c'mon. They're not fooling anyone except you, obviously. This was all planned.

Sneaky lesbians.

Arranging for one of them to have their mother get married, order the cake from Sweetcakes and then two years later plan on ordering a cake from the same vendor.




>>>>

Did that really happen?

Did the lesbians in the Sweetcakes case purchase a Wedding Cake about 2 years prior for one of the mothers of the couple and then return when it was time for their own wedding cake?


Yes, a fact undisputed in the ruling.


>>>>

Tell us the rest of the story. The first cake was a plain cake. The second cake was a cake with specific words on it. Is that correct?

1. The first cake was a wedding cake.

2. The second cake was a wedding cake.


The owners refused service BEFORE there was any discussion as to decorations. (BTW - It's very common in this day and age to not have any words on wedding cake. The fact that there was no discussion of decoration is also an undisputed fact to which the store owners agreed to as part of the proceedings.


>>>>

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The Christian baker sold cakes to anyone. No problem. The problem was created by the lezbos demanding special words be applied to the cake so the new law could be tested.

They informed the bakery that the cake was for two women, at that point the bakery refused to make the cake.

Lie. They said the cake was for their own wedding.

LOL, they are two women. They didn't ask for any special wording or even for a gay cake topper. They just asked for a wedding cake. Why do you need to make things up?

Lying is his version of faith apparently...

 

[Flash Farley]

The

The Christian baker sold cakes to anyone. No problem. The problem was created by the lezbos demanding special words be applied to the cake so the new law could be tested.

They informed the bakery that the cake was for two women, at that point the bakery refused to make the cake.

Lie. They said the cake was for their own wedding.

Which was two women. Where is the lie?

No special words were asked to be put on it.

The lezbos said the cake was for their wedding. Go read the original story.

 

[WorldWatcher]

The Christian baker sold cakes to anyone. No problem. The problem was created by the lezbos demanding special words be applied to the cake so the new law could be tested.

Please familiarize yourself with basic facts of the case.


1. The couple didn't target the bakery, they were return customers.

2. There was no discussion of decorations. The owner refused service before their was any discussion of cakes. He refused service after asking the name of the bride and groom and getting the names of two brides.


>>>>

 

[Flash Farley]

The Christian baker sold cakes to anyone. No problem. The problem was created by the lezbos demanding special words be applied to the cake so the new law could be tested.

They informed the bakery that the cake was for two women, at that point the bakery refused to make the cake.

Lie. They said the cake was for their own wedding.

LOL, they are two women. They didn't ask for any special wording or even for a gay cake topper. They just asked for a wedding cake. Why do you need to make things up?

Lying is his version of faith apparently...

Trolling. Poor baby. Is this discussion causing a lot of trauma for you?

 

[Flash Farley]

The Christian baker sold cakes to anyone. No problem. The problem was created by the lezbos demanding special words be applied to the cake so the new law could be tested.

Please familiarize yourself with basic facts of the case.


1. The couple didn't target the bakery, they were return customers.

2. There was no discussion of decorations. The owner refused service before their was any discussion of cakes. He refused service after asking the name of the bride and groom and getting the names of two brides.


>>>>

The lezbos said the cake was for their wedding.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The

The Christian baker sold cakes to anyone. No problem. The problem was created by the lezbos demanding special words be applied to the cake so the new law could be tested.

They informed the bakery that the cake was for two women, at that point the bakery refused to make the cake.

Lie. They said the cake was for their own wedding.

Which was two women. Where is the lie?

No special words were asked to be put on it.

The lezbos said the cake was for their wedding. Go read the original story.

"In January of 2013 Rachel Bowman and her mother went to a local cake bakery to order a wedding cake. The Gresham, Oregon bakery, Sweet Cakes by Melissa, refused the order, despite the fact that their business, as the name implies, was selling wedding cakes. The refusal, from Aaron Klein and his wife Melissa Klein, wasn't because they were understaffed, or had too many orders, or were closing for vacation. No, their reason, as they told Rachel and her mom, was that Rachel was marrying a woman, and baking a cake for a same-sex couple, they said, violated their Christian faith.

"I'm very sorry, I believe I have wasted your time," Aaron Klein says he told Rachel Bowman in his court testimony. "We do not do cakes for same sex weddings." Klein testified he also quoted Leviticus to Bowman and her mother.

Today, after nearly two years of litigation, a judge awarded Rachel Bowman-Cryer $75,000, and her wife, Laurel Bowman-Cryer, $60,000 in damages for their emotional suffering, the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) judge ruled."
Sweet Cakes Bakery Gets GoFundMe Page After Judge Awards Same-Sex Couple 135 000 - The New Civil Rights Movement


You read it, dumbass...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The Christian baker sold cakes to anyone. No problem. The problem was created by the lezbos demanding special words be applied to the cake so the new law could be tested.

They informed the bakery that the cake was for two women, at that point the bakery refused to make the cake.

Lie. They said the cake was for their own wedding.

LOL, they are two women. They didn't ask for any special wording or even for a gay cake topper. They just asked for a wedding cake. Why do you need to make things up?

Lying is his version of faith apparently...

Trolling. Poor baby. Is this discussion causing a lot of trauma for you?

Nope, I'm only too happy to expose another lying ******* Christian...

 

[Flash Farley]

Hateful Christophobic bigot.

They informed the bakery that the cake was for two women, at that point the bakery refused to make the cake.

Lie. They said the cake was for their own wedding.

LOL, they are two women. They didn't ask for any special wording or even for a gay cake topper. They just asked for a wedding cake. Why do you need to make things up?

Lying is his version of faith apparently...

Trolling. Poor baby. Is this discussion causing a lot of trauma for you?

Nope, I'm only too happy to expose another lying ******* Christian...

Hateful Christophobic bigot.

 

[Papageorgio]

The

The Christian baker sold cakes to anyone. No problem. The problem was created by the lezbos demanding special words be applied to the cake so the new law could be tested.

They informed the bakery that the cake was for two women, at that point the bakery refused to make the cake.

Lie. They said the cake was for their own wedding.

Which was two women. Where is the lie?

No special words were asked to be put on it.

The lezbos said the cake was for their wedding. Go read the original story.

Right, between two women, they gave their names to the baker and the baker then declined to make the cake and only one of the two women were there at the time, according to the court documents.

 

[WorldWatcher]

The Christian baker sold cakes to anyone. No problem. The problem was created by the lezbos demanding special words be applied to the cake so the new law could be tested.

Please familiarize yourself with basic facts of the case.


1. The couple didn't target the bakery, they were return customers.

2. There was no discussion of decorations. The owner refused service before their was any discussion of cakes. He refused service after asking the name of the bride and groom and getting the names of two brides.


>>>>

The lezbos said the cake was for their wedding.

Correct?

So? Doesn't change either of the two claims that you have made that are wrong. One, targeting. Two, writing on the cake.

The point of the case is that service was refused because they were lesbian. As soon as the owner found out the wedding cake was for lesbians he refused them service. Even calling them "abominations" when challenged by the mother of one of the brides.

 

[Ravi]

What kind of Christian would call two people abominations simple because they wanted to buy a cake? I just can't wrap my mind around that.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The Christian baker sold cakes to anyone. No problem. The problem was created by the lezbos demanding special words be applied to the cake so the new law could be tested.

Please familiarize yourself with basic facts of the case.


1. The couple didn't target the bakery, they were return customers.

2. There was no discussion of decorations. The owner refused service before their was any discussion of cakes. He refused service after asking the name of the bride and groom and getting the names of two brides.


>>>>

The lezbos said the cake was for their wedding.

Correct?

So? Doesn't change either of the two claims that you have made that are wrong. One, targeting. Two, writing on the cake.

The point of the case is that service was refused because they were lesbian. As soon as the owner found out the wedding cake was for lesbians he refused them service. Even calling them "abominations" when challenged by the mother of one of the brides.

The little liar will run away now. He doesn't have anything like enough stones to admit he was dead ******* wrong, they never do the little Jesus-freaks.

 

[Flash Farley]

The Christian baker sold cakes to anyone. No problem. The problem was created by the lezbos demanding special words be applied to the cake so the new law could be tested.

Please familiarize yourself with basic facts of the case.


1. The couple didn't target the bakery, they were return customers.

2. There was no discussion of decorations. The owner refused service before their was any discussion of cakes. He refused service after asking the name of the bride and groom and getting the names of two brides.


>>>>

The lezbos said the cake was for their wedding.

Correct?

So? Doesn't change either of the two claims that you have made that are wrong. One, targeting. Two, writing on the cake.

The point of the case is that service was refused because they were lesbian. As soon as the owner found out the wedding cake was for lesbians he refused them service. Even calling them "abominations" when challenged by the mother of one of the brides.

The little liar will run away now. He doesn't have anything like enough stones to admit he was dead ******* wrong, they never do the little Jesus-freaks.

Hateful Christophobic bigot.