eots
no fly list
this thread is so gay
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Whenever I come on message boards, I find it's usually after 20 posts when the resident old fart blowhard tries to smack down the newbie, only to be handed his ass. Seems you've also fulfilled this in single-digits. Congrats.
BTW, I think this douche needs to be known as A Bitch-ass Sissy, since that's what he acts like.
Funny, but Bitch-ass here calls me a homophobe for not supporting gay marriage...right after making a stereotypical joke about decorating.
I guess even if I did think my cock, I'd still be smarter than your ignorant ass.
Marital benefits aren't rights, and the gay community hasn't proven why same-sex couples deserve those benefits beyond the fact that they exist and love each other.
ETA: Why is it that the Right has to eat it on this issue? Most people in Congress -- Democrat, Republican, or Independent -- believes marriage is between one man and one woman. But in the political arena, it gets twisted like the Democrats are more friendly to the gay marriage cause than Republicans...then they go to Congress and nothing changes.
Really? Then why did you proposition me and invite me to blow you douchebag?
By the way Shit Sac, you never stated how old your punk ass is. Or, are you one of those pussy assed college boys that is too scared to join the military? Or, are you still flipping burgers at McD's?
Marital benefits aren't rights, and the gay community hasn't proven why same-sex couples deserve those benefits beyond the fact that they exist and love each other.
ETA: Why is it that the Right has to eat it on this issue? Most people in Congress -- Democrat, Republican, or Independent -- believes marriage is between one man and one woman. But in the political arena, it gets twisted like the Democrats are more friendly to the gay marriage cause than Republicans...then they go to Congress and nothing changes.
Whatever. I'd seen that article on HuffPo -- the liberal atheist clearinghouse that it is -- and I couldn't read it then, either.
The article starts off with this same kind of "well, see, people who believe in traditional marriage are wrong because look at the other archaic traditions that are in the tradition of marriage." It trips on its own two feet, because all the examples it gives are between who? Men and women.
I think it's a gross oversimplification of what the Bible says, and does so with a fair amount of self-righteous pandering to the Left. At this stage in the game, I think there's a legitimate legal secular argument against gay marriage that doesn't even rely on Biblical tenets. I just think a lot of people love complaining about religious doctrine, whatever it is, rather than maintain this dishonest altruistic need to separate church and state. I hear more people complain about the homosexual persecution by religious people than I've ever actually seen it play out.
It's funny how using the Bible is all cool and respectable when it's used to justify gay marriage, but when it's used to deny it, oh, separation of church and state!
Pick a side, and stay there, is all I ask.
Where in my argument did I rely on the Bible or God as why I'm against gay marriage?
Secular?
It's simple, nature makes the case very clearly for mammals. There are makes and there are females. This is used for reproduction purposes and in some unique cases, humans being one, it also permits for sexual gratification. The physiological body parts are designed to go together very well, as nature intended to achieve both. If the human male penis was intended to be inserted into the human rectum, then the rectum would provide the reproduction process. However, it does not.
I guess that is as simple, as basic and as secular as it can be explained. Of course anyone can come along and twist these basic facts to their own personal perversion.
You haven't made an argument against gay marriage. That is what I am asking you to do. Tradition is not an argument. We've had any number of traditions that haven't held up constitutionally. Nor can you cite majority homophobia as a valid reason-again we are a constitutional republic even though you think it irrelevant.
The pursuit of happiness is certainly a right. Marriage to the person you love is part of that which gives us happiness and clearly it is being denied to some. Other than a tradition of bigotry and hatred against homosexuality what is the reason for discrimination against a minority?
"
Pick a side, and stay there, is all I ask."
Picking a side and staying there sounds like a recipe for a closed mind, which I hope you would/could overcome with new information and insight.
I do not think people understand their own biases, prejudices and bigotry and that is okay on some level. It is what makes life interesting. If I were to say I think you may be a bit bigoted on this, it is not meant as an insult, only an observation. Think of it as when I say somebody is ignorant of something. The negative connotations are usually on the side of others---not meant by me. Ignorance in it's simplest is nothing but a lack of knowledge about something. Bigotry is nothing but being stuck in a position and staying there no matter what information comes along.
Arguing that traditional marriage as an institution is in danger because of gay marriages is an argument born of fear and loathing and ignorance. Traditional marriage has been soiled since the very first divorce and first adultry, so blaming gays for some hypothetical destruction of a flawed institution is an ignorant argument. We as a society accept so much in marriages that violate the 'sacred' oaths uttered before gods and civil authorities that it is laughable in a sad way to even entertain the arguments that marriage is somehow threatened because two individuals of the same sex/gender want what individuals of different genders have---a recognition of their love and bonds.
I would hope you could argue about marriage outside of religion because that is what the court cases are about---civil marriages.
and please, can you name one thing that the fear mongers in Massachusetts warned about if gays got married that has come to be?
First of all, that meant to not be a hypocrite and condone something for yourself while condemning it for other people.
"Bigotry" is a pejorative word, even if you don't mean it that way. Saying someone might not understand an issue is just that. Calling them names is just going to put people on the defensive.
Marriage is a tradition. Appealing to what it always has been isn't wrong. Saying that because it's never been perfect that we should just accept every attempt to change it is just appealing to novelty. People want to keep one thing intact: the man/woman stipulation.
are you comparing disgraceful breaks of a bond with gods and civil authorities with homosexuality? homosexuality is a bad thing? how?It's retarded to point out that there are a lot of things that sully the point of marriage. No shit. It's not like people who disagree with gay marriage promote them, and they don't try to put them into law.
You haven't made an argument against gay marriage. That is what I am asking you to do. Tradition is not an argument. We've had any number of traditions that haven't held up constitutionally. Nor can you cite majority homophobia as a valid reason-again we are a constitutional republic even though you think it irrelevant.
The pursuit of happiness is certainly a right. Marriage to the person you love is part of that which gives us happiness and clearly it is being denied to some. Other than a tradition of bigotry and hatred against homosexuality what is the reason for discrimination against a minority?
Forget the bible, being queer is against nature too!
I won't let my personal beliefs interfere with what others do in their life, so long as their life doesn't hinder my life in any fashion, but, my opinion is mine and being queer is contradictory of nature.
Men are built one way and women another for a reason. It doesn't matter if you want to use the bible to make the case or nature it's self. The result is the same! Period.
VOTES = MONEY / MONEY - VOTES
MONEY & VOTES = POWER & PERSONAL WEALTH
You saw what took place on the Left-Coast, when push came to shove!
So, now they blame that on the Christian's, Blacks and Hispanics!
tffYeah, I got a nickel. And I bet the fucker is smarter than you.
"Pigeon hole God into our little comfortable box"? What in the gently caress is your bitch ass talking about? That's the point of monotheistic religion -- faith in an idea of the nature of God. Yeah, assholes like me...
Maybe you meant to say "you're an asshole because you hate to corn hole". Yeah, sorry. Guilty as charged. Guess you gotta find another road to hoe. Then again, you probably enjoy that.
So.....you're saying that your dick is smarter than me, which means that you think with your cock. No wonder you asked me to blow you.
BTW......take your mistletoe and shove it up your ass.
Interestingly enough, since I've been on these boards, I've noticed that it generally takes someone to go from newbie to full blown stupid in at least 50 posts. Congratulations.....you've managed to do it in single digits.
BTW Everyone, I think ChrisMac should be known as Shit Sack (or Shit Sac) from now on. He thinks he's got balls, but it's pure crap.
Welcome to USMB prick.