Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The bakers were not judging the couple, they were refusing to commit a sin themselves.
Which sin is that?
The bakers were not judging the couple, they were refusing to commit a sin themselves.
Which sin is that?
Participating in and endorsing an abomination. That's why the baker could sell them anything they wanted and maintain a business relationship with them but not bake the wedding cake. It was never a judgment on homosexuality, but a refusal to endorse and participate in homosexuality.
You are not participating in the wedding, they have already taken their vows
I can see providing a ring.....but a cake?
If God considers homosexuality a sin, let him punish those getting married
It is not up to bakers
You are not participating in the wedding, they have already taken their vows
I can see providing a ring.....but a cake?
If God considers homosexuality a sin, let him punish those getting married
It is not up to bakers
Again, the bakers aren't punishing gays. That's not their motivation. They are protecting themselves from eternal damnation (Jude 1 Romans 1 NT)..
The bakers were not judging the couple, they were refusing to commit a sin themselves.
Which sin is that?
Participating in and endorsing an abomination. That's why the baker could sell them anything they wanted and maintain a business relationship with them but not bake the wedding cake. It was never a judgment on homosexuality, but a refusal to endorse and participate in homosexuality.
No God would send people to hell for baking a cakeYou are not participating in the wedding, they have already taken their vows
I can see providing a ring.....but a cake?
If God considers homosexuality a sin, let him punish those getting married
It is not up to bakers
Again, the bakers aren't punishing gays. That's not their motivation. They are protecting themselves from eternal damnation (Jude 1 Romans 1 NT).
However, the lesbians were punishing the Christians in that they knew they could go elsewhere but chose instead to force a Christian couple out of business as an act of dogmatic-dominance display. Which is fodder for a countersuit.
Then why are you still such a hypocrite ?Anyone with a lick of sense recognizes a typo.
You're not clever. Not funny. You're ill informed and incredibly annoying.
You can walk down the street and spot atheists and adulterers?
Stupid sob, that's a lame rebuttal.
I enjoy pointing out typos and grammar mistakes from those attempting to belittle the intelligence of others
If you were a true "Christian Bakery" you would ask customers if they take Jesus as their savior
Adulterers are well known in their community. He is divorced because he cheated on his wife and is now marrying the hussy he was cheating with
How could a devoted Christian baker make a cake for such a wedding?
Yawn, you don't understand Christianity or faith and you're blabbering like an inchorent fool on this thread.
But gotta keep that post count up, eh?
I understand hypocrisy when I see it
?
Because bakers represent the moral compass of our society
Only they can decide who is righteous enough to receive a cake
They aren't passing righteous judgment. They're afraid of eternal peril. I know you understand the difference, but it sounds much more insidious when you put it your way. Won't fly with a judge though. The Christians and Jude 1 will have their day in court.
Because bakers represent the moral compass of our society
Only they can decide who is righteous enough to receive a cake
They aren't passing righteous judgment. They're afraid of eternal peril. I know you understand the difference, but it sounds much more insidious when you put it your way. Won't fly with a judge though. The Christians and Jude 1 will have their day in court.
Personally, I don't give a rat's ass WHAT they're doing when they decide to refuse service. I'm still very hung up on the fact that no one has the right to force someone else to do something for them.
If you are going to be a Christian Bakery....be a Christian Bakery
Only bake cakes for righteous Christian weddings
But once you start picking and choosing about which Christian edicts you will enforce......you lose the claim of being a "Christian Bakery"
So says you...and anyone wuth a lick of sense laughs at your musings. I know I do
wuth?
Anyone with a "lick if sense" knows the word is "with"
Anyone with a lick of sense recognizes a typo.
You're not clever. Not funny. You're ill informed and incredibly annoying.
You can walk down the street and spot atheists and adulterers?
Stupid sob, that's a lame rebuttal.
I enjoy pointing out typos and grammar mistakes from those attempting to belittle the intelligence of others
If you were a true "Christian Bakery" you would ask customers if they take Jesus as their savior
Adulterers are well known in their community. He is divorced because he cheated on his wife and is now marrying the hussy he was cheating with
How could a devoted Christian baker make a cake for such a wedding?
It does appear the baker picks the sin he finds abhorrent, thus the religious exemption may fail.
What's God's law on baking wedding cakes?Because bakers represent the moral compass of our society
Only they can decide who is righteous enough to receive a cake
They aren't passing righteous judgment. They're afraid of eternal peril. I know you understand the difference, but it sounds much more insidious when you put it your way. Won't fly with a judge though. The Christians and Jude 1 will have their day in court.
Nobody has ever been sent to hell for baking a cake
They have for disobeying God's law.
Dumbass
Right, the one you made up like God and all the rest.
I enjoy pointing out typos and grammar mistakes from those attempting to belittle the intelligence of others
If you were a true "Christian Bakery" you would ask customers if they take Jesus as their savior
Adulterers are well known in their community. He is divorced because he cheated on his wife and is now marrying the hussy he was cheating with
How could a devoted Christian baker make a cake for such a wedding?
It does appear the baker picks the sin he finds abhorrent, thus the religious exemption may fail.
Got your fingers crossed?
No, I read the passages cited; men with men are only one of the sins noted. If the baker makes cakes for adulterers, his religious exemption MAY be faulty.
How would the baker know who's an adulter?
Good grief, THINK
If the baker really follows his faith, he should ask.
Got your fingers crossed?
No, I read the passages cited; men with men are only one of the sins noted. If the baker makes cakes for adulterers, his religious exemption MAY be faulty.
How would the baker know who's an adulter?
Good grief, THINK
If the baker really follows his faith, he should ask.
Lame....excuse me sir have you committed adultery?
Good gawd, that's stupid
How did he know the two he refused to serve were gay?
They told him. If they hadn't, he wouldn't have known or cared.
They told him. If they hadn't, he wouldn't have known or cared.
So two guys ask for a wedding cake for their wedding cake, he wouldn't know they are gay?
Craig and Mullins v. Masterpiece CakeShop - Decision
>>>>
Nobody is forcing you to open a business
If you can't follow the laws....you don't belong in business
Nobody is forcing you to open a business
If you can't follow the laws....you don't belong in business
The First Amendment is the law. Being part of the Constitution, it is the highest law, and takes precedence over all legislative acts.
Someone who can't follow that law doesn't belong in government.
They told him. If they hadn't, he wouldn't have known or cared.
So two guys ask for a wedding cake for their wedding cake, he wouldn't know they are gay?
Craig and Mullins v. Masterpiece CakeShop - Decision
>>>>
No, he told them....conveniently. He has had no clue other sinners EVER asked him to bake a cake for them.
Someone who flagrantly violates that Highest Law belongs in a countersuit for violation of someone else's constitutional rights.The First Amendment is the law. Being part of the Constitution, it is the highest law, and takes precedence over all legislative acts.
Someone who can't follow that law doesn't belong in government.
. If your side wins, I will be able to force gay bakers to make a cake with "God Hates Fags and my baker agrees!" Are you okay with that?Its about following the law.Opponents in LGBT case agree: It's not about wedding cake
In a legal case with profound implications for LGBT rights and religion's place in public life, the opposing sides agree on this: It's not about the cake.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
And everyone with a brain left know this is how it should be. It isn't about the cake it is about being " FORCED" ........this is America not N. Korea.
Some Christians think that they shouldn't have to follow the law- even though no American- by law- can refuse to serve a Christian- for being a Christian.
