lennypartiv
Diamond Member
- Jul 16, 2019
- 26,348
- 20,193
- 2,320
If Dems can rig elections, they can also rig court cases.He won't be found guilty. Not a chance. Not even in NY. This case is DEAD.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If Dems can rig elections, they can also rig court cases.He won't be found guilty. Not a chance. Not even in NY. This case is DEAD.
You almost got it right but not quite.
The payments are considered In kind campaign donations. This means they are indirect donations. Money spent to support the campaign but not actually donated to the campaign fund. Such spending counts towards the amount that an individual is allowed to donate. The payments were illegal because they exceeded the donation limit.
Coen used his own money to pay off Daniel's and others, not money from Trump's campaign.
Trump then allegedly used his company to repay Cohen, but had his accountants falsify the records to make the repayments look like payments for legal work that Cohen wasn't actually doing for the company. This becomes a felony if coupled with another crime. That other crime being conspiring to violate election finance laws by arranging for the illegal payoffs.
A misdemeanor becomes a felony in New York if it is used to cover up another crime.NY v Trump: Michael Cohen admits to stealing tens of thousands from former president's business
Michael Cohen, a lawyer who previously worked for former President Trump, admitted Monday in the NY v. Trump case that he stole thousands from The Trump Organization.www.foxnews.com
I wish I understood a few more details about this case, but I am piecing together that it's a matter of falsifying business records--or not. What Daniels' testimony had to do with is anyone's guess...
Oh wait... Guessing not needed. . it was only there to make Trump look bad.
Then there is the issue of the statute of limitations, which I understand has passed.. so why would Trump cop to lesser charges?
At Point 1.57 the attorney says there is no proof of falsifying records.
You cucks need to give that "stolen election" horseshit up. You are going to be embarrassed one day at how credulous and stupid you sound.If Dems can rig elections, they can also rig court cases.
1. Today (Tuesday) will be the last witness.The defense will close it's questioning of witnesses tomorrow most likely. Of course trump did not take the stand as he promised. No surprise there. So we should have a verdict probably this week.
1. Bragg had Cohen over a "30-year" barrel. His theft is much worse than than Trump's misdemeanor.Dude, the top witness for your side just admitted to stealing 30,000 dollars from Trump. He's a convicted liar, and now and ADMITTED THIEF.
It's a joke and ridiculous. Trump will be found not guilty.
What other crime?A misdemeanor becomes a felony in New York if it is used to cover up another crime.
Trump's falsifying of his business records was done to cover up the campaign election fraud by Cohen for Trump. The campaign election fraud was the payment to Stormy Daniels. The $130,000 was an in-kind contribution to Trump, directed to Daniels, which exceeds campaign finance limits.
Thus, felony.
1. Actually the "crime" Bragg charged Trump with was (para) "hiding the affair with Stormy from voters"A misdemeanor becomes a felony in New York if it is used to cover up another crime.
Trump's falsifying of his business records was done to cover up the campaign election fraud by Cohen for Trump. The campaign election fraud was the payment to Stormy Daniels. The $130,000 was an in-kind contribution to Trump, directed to Daniels, which exceeds campaign finance limits. Thus, felony.
Hiding the Stormy tryst from voters.What other crime?
The one that she signed an affidavit saying it never happened and then lied under oath saying it did?Hiding the Stormy tryst from voters.
Nope. Without her mere CLAIM of sex, the NDA would have never been challenged.If there was no sex, payments to Cohen could have been see as legal fees by the jury, making her testimony necessary. It also brought into evidence the fact that Trump lied about it and what else is he lying about?
While the sex wasn’t a crime, laundering the payment through his company to aid the campaign is a crime.Nope. Without her mere CLAIM of sex, the NDA would have never been challenged.
But whether or not any sex took place remains immaterial to the elements of the charged crime and therefore completely irrelevant.
Trump’s liar and thief, backed up by documents proving he’s NOT lying about this.The star witness is a piece of shit. What's he lying about? Nobody gives a fuck because he's a liar and a thief.
An unproved claim. Actually, a combo of unproved claims, which rely on the word of the convicted perjurer and thief and serial liar, Cohen.While the sex wasn’t a crime, laundering the payment through his company to aid the campaign is a crime.
Not a shred of evidence supports a word spoken by your perjurer pal.Trump’s liar and thief, backed up by documents proving he’s NOT lying about this.
The whole point of the trisl is to proves claims, though most would call them charges. As for Cohen, who did he lie and cheat for?An unproved claim. Actually, a combo of unproved claims, which rely on the word of the convicted perjurer and thief and serial liar, Cohen.
Not a shred of evidence supports a word spoken by your perjurer pal.
The whole point of any trial is to try to prove the claims.The whole point of the trisl is to proves claims, though most would call them charges. As for Cohen, who did he lie and cheat for?
That’s irrelevant to Trump’s crimes and he’s already been in prison on Trump’s account.The whole point of any trial is to try to prove the claims.
Cohen lied and stole and cheated for himself.