Blues Man
Diamond Member
- Aug 28, 2016
- 35,513
- 14,899
- 1,530
Taken as a proper noun that may or may not serve. As I read it, Gnosticism was an early form of Christianity. Entirely different in its normal adjective form though. It just means to know or claim affirmative knowledge of something as opposed to one making no such claims / being agnostic. One claiming to be an "agnostic atheist" is therefore just your run of the mill atheist.Gnostic - Belief that the God (or gods) we worship are in fact evil tricksters and that a secret knowledge is preventing us from the true God.
How you defined the term "Atheist - There is no god" fits one claiming to be a "gnostic atheist." Beats me how one can make an affirmative knowledge claim while simultaneously claiming lack of belief in gods? Such self-proclaimed "gnostic atheists" are clearly confused and self-contradictory at best. But there apparently being no more suitable term available, I suppose "gnostic atheist" must continue to serve for the purpose.
"Agnostic - There may or may not be a god, but open to know more." - An agnostic is really just an atheist who's confused or too chicken to admit it. Everyone claims to be "open to know more." That's just feel good BS tacked on to distract from the falsely implied dichotomy. Just as there are those claiming to be "gnostic"- and "agnostic atheists," some claim to be "gnostic"- and "agnostic agnostics." Wait? Whaa?
Yep. There may be a god or gods. Don't claim to know. Lack any such knowledge. That's an atheist. That's also an agnostic. Dunno. Pretend I'm from Missouri and show me some scientific evidence.. then perhaps I'll know something other than myriad miraculous stories and theories that annoy my critical thinking skills no end.
I did not define those terms they were in the link