One Of Trump's Unconstitutional EOs Is Being Raked Over the Coals By SCOTUS Tomorrow

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I honestly don't understand why this topic causes you so many tears.

Neat. I do, however, understand your weak trolling. Tears, huh? Ok.

 

[MayorQuimby]

Neat. I do, however, understand your weak trolling. Tears, huh? Ok.

I'm not trolling. Just concerned about America. And your mental health.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I'm not trolling. Just concerned about America. And your mental health.

Right! Totally honest of you, and in no way are you seeking negative attention for lack of any other.

 

[MayorQuimby]

Right! Totally honest of you, and in no way are you seeking negative attention for lack of any other.

I'd like to believe the attention I am getting from you is rather positive.

 

[Foxfyre]

Actually, this post reminded me of something about lefties. It seems that lefties are constantly re-inventing the English language (in a bad way). They would come up with a new word, to replace an existing old word which they thought was offensive, and when the new word started being offensive, too, they had to come up with another new one. They just don't seem to realize that it doesn't matter how they try to dress something up differently, if that something is fundamentally, inherently bad, then any new words that you try hard to invent, will take on the same stink. Sadly lefties are oblivious to this.

Anchor babies are neither offensive nor inoffensive. It is simply an accurately descriptive term for a situation that certainly exists.

But you're right that the left is constantly rewriting the English language to match what THEY decide is politically correct. I want us to return to a culture in which they ill no longer have any power to do that.

 

[MayorQuimby]

Anchor babies are neither offensive nor inoffensive. It is simply an accurately descriptive term for a situation that certainly exists.

But you're right that the left is constantly rewriting the English language to match what THEY decide is politically correct. I want us to return to a culture in which they ill no longer have any power to do that.

Personally, I just say exactly what I want to say. And if they get offended and start to correct me, I double-down and say it some more, and louder, too. Pretty soon they start to realize how little power they actually have. I love it.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Biden did not even sign his own EOs or pardons.

Hmm. Sounds like bullshit.

 

[Orangecat]

You clearly have a reading comprehension issue

That's the least of his shortcomings.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

If the law is clear why would you be pleased if the court ignored that?


Illegals do not get housing or anything else.

See my comment above #413 above:
One Of Trump's Unconstitutional EOs Is Being Raked Over the Coals By SCOTUS Tomorrow

 

[Orangecat]

That pushback should happen. Not violence, not destruction.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

And those accusations are justified.

If I have to obey our laws, it is unjust for me to want everyone else to have to obey our laws as well?

 

[Paradoxical#1]

So when SCOTUS hears something that deals with a constitutional amendment, all of the case law that supports the current interpretation of the amendment is irrelevant? I'm asking if they take it into consideration at all?

A constitutional amendment is not heard by the Supreme Court. It can only be amended by a vote of 2/3rds of the states. Only when and if that is done, it is part of the constitution.

 

[Unkotare]

Anchor babies are neither offensive nor inoffensive. It is simply an accurately descriptive term for a situation that certainly exists.
...

It is NOT "an accurately descriptive term" because the situation does NOT exist.

 

[Unkotare]

Nope. According to many legal thinkers and Constitutional and historical scholars.
...

Not the ones sitting on the Supreme Court.

 

[Unkotare]

...

You’re a nobody on the internet, Unk. ...

I sure am.

 

[Couchpotato]

It is NOT "an accurately descriptive term" because the situation does NOT exist.

Is it really your argument that having a US citizen child doesn’t reduce the chances of an illegal immigrant being deported?

 

[Unkotare]

Is it really your argument that having a US citizen child doesn’t reduce the chances of an illegal immigrant being deported?

That's a fact. As I said, I personally know many families separated in this manner.

 

[BackAgain]

Not the ones sitting on the Supreme Court.

 

[BackAgain]

I sure am.

I know. We all know. It was never a secret.

 

[Unkotare]

I know. We all know. It was never a secret.

No it wasn't.