"Once again, the gay community feels the need to be sore winners," wrote Christopher Ciccone, who hi

[PaintMyHouse]

Fascism is a form of socialism.

No, dumbass, it isn't.

Yes it is, dumbass

Not the same at all, dumbass: the definition of fascism

That sounds exactly like the Obama regime.

Not even close to a hint of it, dumbass. When are you ever going to grow up my little infant...

 

[MaryL]

Gays use subterfuge and adoption or artificial insemination.

So do breeders, who invented all three...

Um, yes, breeders are the bad guys. Tell your parents that.

 

[rightwinger]

c

In the early 90's, Colorado voters tried to vote against the gay agenda, and the majority, those lawful votes were thrown out because...the result was "unconstitutional". Why bother voting for ANYTHING if a minority people with $ can manipulate the system and over throw the electoral system? There was more to it than that, but that was my take of that mess. So disillusioned with the voting process.

How would you like someone to vote on YOUR right to marry?

That is a false argument. Won't chase that red herring. Gays aren't forbidden to love, just don't force ALL people to equate Herosexual reproduction with gay lust. We have children like YOU. Gays use subterfuge and adoption or artificial insemination. Seems that is all this topic is about. But when MY vote legal and lawful vote against gays gets thrown out by the supreme court, I have to wonder, were will that that lead to? when will it end? Why vote at all?

You are voting on who they are allowed to love

How about if the same standard were applied to you?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

LOL. It's why hitler invaded the Soviet Union and killed millions, why communists/actual socialists were put down..

I've heard all these arguments 1000 times. They are just as lame as the first time I heard them. Vietnam invaded Cambodia. Does that mean Vietnam wasn't socialist?

You have to be a special kind of stupid to be a socialist.

Its not an argument silly child, it's a fact. Do you want me to believe the DPRK is democratic because it's in there parties name?

Do the Democrat party doesn't believe in democracy? Is that what you're saying?

You're a special kind of stupid.

Err, America is a representative democracy, both parties support this, well, you believe we're living under a fascist dictatorship (thanks Obama) so I won't bother reasoning with you.

But your theory is that the labels a political organization applies to itself are always lies, like the label "Democrat."

Democrats now believe in the Democratic Republic, while GOPers believe in mob rule (AKA democracy as long as darkies and the poor don't vote)...

 

[bripat9643]

Fascism is a form of socialism.

No, dumbass, it isn't.

Yes it is, dumbass

Not the same at all, dumbass: the definition of fascism

"fascism in Culture

fascism [( fash -iz-uhm)]


A system of government that flourished in Europe from the 1920s to the end of World War II. Germany under Adolf Hitler, Italy under Mussolini, and Spain under Franco were all fascist states. As a rule, fascist governments are dominated by a dictator, who usually possesses a magnetic personality, wears a showy uniform, and rallies his followers by mass parades; appeals to strident nationalism; and promotes suspicion or hatred of both foreigners and “impure” people within his own nation, such as the Jews in Germany. Although both communism and fascism are forms of totalitarianism, fascism does not demand state ownership of the means of production, nor is fascism committed to the achievement of economic equality. In theory, communism opposes the identification of government with a single charismatic leader (the “ cult of personality”), which is the cornerstone of fascism. Whereas communists are considered left-wing, fascists are usually described as right-wing."

That's an obviously biased and purely idiosyncratic definition. It's no more valid than a definition I might make up.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Gays use subterfuge and adoption or artificial insemination.

So do breeders, who invented all three...

Um, yes, breeder are the bad guys. Tell your parents that.

True enough, in many cases.

 

[bripat9643]

c

In the early 90's, Colorado voters tried to vote against the gay agenda, and the majority, those lawful votes were thrown out because...the result was "unconstitutional". Why bother voting for ANYTHING if a minority people with $ can manipulate the system and over throw the electoral system? There was more to it than that, but that was my take of that mess. So disillusioned with the voting process.

How would you like someone to vote on YOUR right to marry?

That is a false argument. Won't chase that red herring. Gays aren't forbidden to love, just don't force ALL people to equate Herosexual reproduction with gay lust. We have children like YOU. Gays use subterfuge and adoption or artificial insemination. Seems that is all this topic is about. But when MY vote legal and lawful vote against gays gets thrown out by the supreme court, I have to wonder, were will that that lead to? when will it end? Why vote at all?

You are voting on who they are allowed to love

How about if the same standard were applied to you?

We have already voted on it. The queers lost. Democracy sucks, don't it?

 

[bripat9643]

I've heard all these arguments 1000 times. They are just as lame as the first time I heard them. Vietnam invaded Cambodia. Does that mean Vietnam wasn't socialist?

You have to be a special kind of stupid to be a socialist.

Its not an argument silly child, it's a fact. Do you want me to believe the DPRK is democratic because it's in there parties name?

Do the Democrat party doesn't believe in democracy? Is that what you're saying?

You're a special kind of stupid.

Err, America is a representative democracy, both parties support this, well, you believe we're living under a fascist dictatorship (thanks Obama) so I won't bother reasoning with you.

But your theory is that the labels a political organization applies to itself are always lies, like the label "Democrat."

Democrats now believe in the Democratic Republic, while GOPers believe in mob rule (AKA democracy as long as darkies and the poor don't vote)...

Democrats believe in government, and that's all they believe in.

 

[occupied]

c

In the early 90's, Colorado voters tried to vote against the gay agenda, and the majority, those lawful votes were thrown out because...the result was "unconstitutional". Why bother voting for ANYTHING if a minority people with $ can manipulate the system and over throw the electoral system? There was more to it than that, but that was my take of that mess. So disillusioned with the voting process.

How would you like someone to vote on YOUR right to marry?

That is a false argument. Won't chase that red herring. Gays aren't forbidden to love, just don't force ALL people to equate Herosexual reproduction with gay lust. We have children like YOU. Gays use subterfuge and adoption or artificial insemination. Seems that is all this topic is about. But when MY vote legal and lawful vote against gays gets thrown out by the supreme court, I have to wonder, were will that that lead to? when will it end? Why vote at all?

Such is the growing political futility of being a social conservative. All that stuff bound to be defeated and their few victories are but temporary.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Fascism is a form of socialism.

No, dumbass, it isn't.

Yes it is, dumbass

Not the same at all, dumbass: the definition of fascism

"fascism in Culture

fascism [( fash -iz-uhm)]


A system of government that flourished in Europe from the 1920s to the end of World War II. Germany under Adolf Hitler, Italy under Mussolini, and Spain under Franco were all fascist states. As a rule, fascist governments are dominated by a dictator, who usually possesses a magnetic personality, wears a showy uniform, and rallies his followers by mass parades; appeals to strident nationalism; and promotes suspicion or hatred of both foreigners and “impure” people within his own nation, such as the Jews in Germany. Although both communism and fascism are forms of totalitarianism, fascism does not demand state ownership of the means of production, nor is fascism committed to the achievement of economic equality. In theory, communism opposes the identification of government with a single charismatic leader (the “ cult of personality”), which is the cornerstone of fascism. Whereas communists are considered left-wing, fascists are usually described as right-wing."

That's an obviously biased and purely idiosyncratic definition. It's no more valid than a definition I might make up.

It's a valid one actually, and so is this: The 14 Defining Characteristics Of Fascism

It's not that hard to work out, the history is known but like reality you choose to ignore, or never bother to read it which is much more likely...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Its not an argument silly child, it's a fact. Do you want me to believe the DPRK is democratic because it's in there parties name?

Do the Democrat party doesn't believe in democracy? Is that what you're saying?

You're a special kind of stupid.

Err, America is a representative democracy, both parties support this, well, you believe we're living under a fascist dictatorship (thanks Obama) so I won't bother reasoning with you.

But your theory is that the labels a political organization applies to itself are always lies, like the label "Democrat."

Democrats now believe in the Democratic Republic, while GOPers believe in mob rule (AKA democracy as long as darkies and the poor don't vote)...

Democrats believe in government, and that's all they believe in.

Nope. Some are even liberals like me, who believe in the founding principles of the nation.

If you weren't such a selfish infantile anarchist, you'd be a decent fascist.

 

[bripat9643]

c

In the early 90's, Colorado voters tried to vote against the gay agenda, and the majority, those lawful votes were thrown out because...the result was "unconstitutional". Why bother voting for ANYTHING if a minority people with $ can manipulate the system and over throw the electoral system? There was more to it than that, but that was my take of that mess. So disillusioned with the voting process.

How would you like someone to vote on YOUR right to marry?

That is a false argument. Won't chase that red herring. Gays aren't forbidden to love, just don't force ALL people to equate Herosexual reproduction with gay lust. We have children like YOU. Gays use subterfuge and adoption or artificial insemination. Seems that is all this topic is about. But when MY vote legal and lawful vote against gays gets thrown out by the supreme court, I have to wonder, were will that that lead to? when will it end? Why vote at all?

Such is the growing political futility of being a social conservative. All that stuff bound to be defeated and their few victories are but temporary.

It's never defeated at the ballot box. It's "defeated" by judges or by some dictator like Obama making the law himself. That's why this government is a tyranny.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

c

In the early 90's, Colorado voters tried to vote against the gay agenda, and the majority, those lawful votes were thrown out because...the result was "unconstitutional". Why bother voting for ANYTHING if a minority people with $ can manipulate the system and over throw the electoral system? There was more to it than that, but that was my take of that mess. So disillusioned with the voting process.

How would you like someone to vote on YOUR right to marry?

That is a false argument. Won't chase that red herring. Gays aren't forbidden to love, just don't force ALL people to equate Herosexual reproduction with gay lust. We have children like YOU. Gays use subterfuge and adoption or artificial insemination. Seems that is all this topic is about. But when MY vote legal and lawful vote against gays gets thrown out by the supreme court, I have to wonder, were will that that lead to? when will it end? Why vote at all?

You are voting on who they are allowed to love

How about if the same standard were applied to you?

We have already voted on it. The queers lost. Democracy sucks, don't it?

Rights aren't up for a vote. See the court rulings tossing out your mob rule...

 

[bripat9643]

Do the Democrat party doesn't believe in democracy? Is that what you're saying?

You're a special kind of stupid.

Err, America is a representative democracy, both parties support this, well, you believe we're living under a fascist dictatorship (thanks Obama) so I won't bother reasoning with you.

But your theory is that the labels a political organization applies to itself are always lies, like the label "Democrat."

Democrats now believe in the Democratic Republic, while GOPers believe in mob rule (AKA democracy as long as darkies and the poor don't vote)...

Democrats believe in government, and that's all they believe in.

Nope. Some are even liberals like me, who believe in the founding principles of the nation.

If you weren't such a selfish infantile anarchist, you'd be a decent fascist.

You take a big shit on the Founding principles of this nation every time you post.

 

[David_42]

Fascism is a form of socialism.

No, dumbass, it isn't.

Yes it is, dumbass

Not the same at all, dumbass: the definition of fascism

"fascism in Culture

fascism [( fash -iz-uhm)]


A system of government that flourished in Europe from the 1920s to the end of World War II. Germany under Adolf Hitler, Italy under Mussolini, and Spain under Franco were all fascist states. As a rule, fascist governments are dominated by a dictator, who usually possesses a magnetic personality, wears a showy uniform, and rallies his followers by mass parades; appeals to strident nationalism; and promotes suspicion or hatred of both foreigners and “impure” people within his own nation, such as the Jews in Germany. Although both communism and fascism are forms of totalitarianism, fascism does not demand state ownership of the means of production, nor is fascism committed to the achievement of economic equality. In theory, communism opposes the identification of government with a single charismatic leader (the “ cult of personality”), which is the cornerstone of fascism. Whereas communists are considered left-wing, fascists are usually described as right-wing."

That's an obviously biased and purely idiosyncratic definition. It's no more valid than a definition I might make up.

You're a self righteous moron who claims everything that doesn't fit your narrow and paranoid world view is propaganda. Historians and experts agree fascism is right wing, hell, Invaded the Soviet Union.

 

[bripat9643]

c

In the early 90's, Colorado voters tried to vote against the gay agenda, and the majority, those lawful votes were thrown out because...the result was "unconstitutional". Why bother voting for ANYTHING if a minority people with $ can manipulate the system and over throw the electoral system? There was more to it than that, but that was my take of that mess. So disillusioned with the voting process.

How would you like someone to vote on YOUR right to marry?

That is a false argument. Won't chase that red herring. Gays aren't forbidden to love, just don't force ALL people to equate Herosexual reproduction with gay lust. We have children like YOU. Gays use subterfuge and adoption or artificial insemination. Seems that is all this topic is about. But when MY vote legal and lawful vote against gays gets thrown out by the supreme court, I have to wonder, were will that that lead to? when will it end? Why vote at all?

You are voting on who they are allowed to love

How about if the same standard were applied to you?

We have already voted on it. The queers lost. Democracy sucks, don't it?

Rights aren't up for a vote. See the court rulings tossing out your mob rule...

There is no right to marry.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Err, America is a representative democracy, both parties support this, well, you believe we're living under a fascist dictatorship (thanks Obama) so I won't bother reasoning with you.

But your theory is that the labels a political organization applies to itself are always lies, like the label "Democrat."

Democrats now believe in the Democratic Republic, while GOPers believe in mob rule (AKA democracy as long as darkies and the poor don't vote)...

Democrats believe in government, and that's all they believe in.

Nope. Some are even liberals like me, who believe in the founding principles of the nation.

If you weren't such a selfish infantile anarchist, you'd be a decent fascist.

You take a big shit on the Founding principles of this nation every time you post.

Nope. The founders and I are bothers, only I'm the smarter one...

 

[David_42]

c

In the early 90's, Colorado voters tried to vote against the gay agenda, and the majority, those lawful votes were thrown out because...the result was "unconstitutional". Why bother voting for ANYTHING if a minority people with $ can manipulate the system and over throw the electoral system? There was more to it than that, but that was my take of that mess. So disillusioned with the voting process.

How would you like someone to vote on YOUR right to marry?

That is a false argument. Won't chase that red herring. Gays aren't forbidden to love, just don't force ALL people to equate Herosexual reproduction with gay lust. We have children like YOU. Gays use subterfuge and adoption or artificial insemination. Seems that is all this topic is about. But when MY vote legal and lawful vote against gays gets thrown out by the supreme court, I have to wonder, were will that that lead to? when will it end? Why vote at all?

You are voting on who they are allowed to love

How about if the same standard were applied to you?

We have already voted on it. The queers lost. Democracy sucks, don't it?

Queers lose? Explains gay marriage, a growing acceptance of homosexuality, the current generation being more liberal then ever..

 

[PaintMyHouse]

c

How would you like someone to vote on YOUR right to marry?

That is a false argument. Won't chase that red herring. Gays aren't forbidden to love, just don't force ALL people to equate Herosexual reproduction with gay lust. We have children like YOU. Gays use subterfuge and adoption or artificial insemination. Seems that is all this topic is about. But when MY vote legal and lawful vote against gays gets thrown out by the supreme court, I have to wonder, were will that that lead to? when will it end? Why vote at all?

You are voting on who they are allowed to love

How about if the same standard were applied to you?

We have already voted on it. The queers lost. Democracy sucks, don't it?

Rights aren't up for a vote. See the court rulings tossing out your mob rule...

There is no right to marry.

The Supreme Court disagrees...

 

[MaryL]

Good Lord, some of you people are so pathetically brainwashed. Gays are such a minority, fact there isn't any rational reason to allow gay marriage, let alone the American supreme court gives credence to it, it just....boggles my mind. Next election, I won't bother. It seems the inmates are running the asylum .