We're all different and have different concepts of dating, relationships, right, wrong etc.
Being wooed and having money spent on me never did anything for me personally (but there is NOTHING WRONG with this... most women enjoy it) - so it's hard for me to comment. In a dating experience, the person and whether they are attractive to me, interesting and fun to be with is pretty much all that matters (but that's just me... I don't judge others that feel differently) - we could sit on a park bench eating $1 McDonald's ice cream cones, and, would prefer that with a man that totally engaged me vs. a rich guy that would take me out in a Limo to the most expensive restaurant, who I thought was not interesting etc.
I agree 100%.

However, when you are looking for a relationship, a man who has his financial situation at least stabilized is a good thing. Let's not forget either that I am an "older woman" at 37, so the things I'm looking for are going to be a little different than a person who is in her 20s. I certainly don't think there is anything wrong with a woman my age looking for a man with financial stability and even a little more. Of course, I would have to like the person too though! Maybe I expect too much?
A typical woman, plain and simple.
What's that supposed to mean? Do you think a woman of my age should date a man who, say, lives with his parents still? Sorry, that some of us have standards.
What it means is exactly what I said. Most women, yes, most, place financial security ( money ) above all else, a fact. I have heard many women say, "I married for love the first time, I'm marrying for money the next time." I have heard many women say, "I wouldn't marry a man unless he had money." I've heard it all over the years. Yes, some women do look for love, friendship, companion ship, compatibility, personality, etc., but, as a rule, women want the MONEY.