- Jan 19, 2010
- 67,832
- 62,282
- 3,605
No I didn't...I said if he were black and wearing a BLM shirt he can say whatever he wants to whomever he cares to...we have seen it all year long....But you just claimed that the reason the guy was arrested was because he wasn't the right color....I don't see skin color and I do not accuse people of racism....that's your skill set not mine....just because an arrest is made doesn't make it racism....how fucked up has the media made you?....listen to yourself...amazing...so you think the police were racist against the white guy when they arrested him??Obviously it is....if your are the right color and are threatening the right people....In other words....you think threatening to shoot people is protected free speech?Why was he arrested for words?....I didn't think that was allowed in a free nation....he didn't shout fire in a crowded room...so what gives?....but we see people burn and loot to their hearts content and get out of jail with a slap on the wrist....so what are you talking about?...What the fuck are you talking about??NO...they should not face any charges...the man was breaking the law and he resisted arrest...case closed....we must reinstall law enforcement authority or this will keep on happening....I wouldn't think of resisting a cop in any way...never have and never will I don't care how wrong they are....I will retract revenge in court in necessary but I will never disobey an order from a cop...would you?....Big tech didn't arrest him...the police did...At least its legal today...free speech is not...apparently....just ask big tech....But would looting a store hurt the darkie in the way he wanted??He should have burned and looted a store instead....that's legal today...free speech is not....
I mean he was really upset at the fact that darkies exist....don't know if looting a store would help that out....
Maybe he can start an organization that is devoted to doing something about the existence of darkies....but I doubt any such group like that is even possible....what would they even call it?
But you didn't mention them...why is this?
Don't you agree the police should face charges for what they did to this man??
I said the guy whom you claim had his "free speech" violated by big tech wasn't arrested by big tech, he was arrested by the police...
Why aren't you addressing your anger with the ACTUAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY that arrested him?
Cool.....the police disagrees.....
So should the police be brought up on charges for arresting this guy for threatening to shoot people?
Let's see.......what is the legal standard for aggravated menacing...
"(A) No person shall knowingly cause another to believe that the offender will cause serious physical harm to the person or property of the other person, the other person's unborn, or a member of the other person's immediate family. (B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of aggravated menacing."
Are you claiming the guy didn't actually threaten to shoot anyone and the police are framing him??
How would you know whether his color was right or wrong if you don't see color??
Now back to the previous point you keep dodging.....do you think the police framed him??