Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Why was he arrested for words?....I didn't think that was allowed in a free nation....he didn't shout fire in a crowded room...so what gives?....but we see people burn and loot to their hearts content and get out of jail with a slap on the wrist....so what are you talking about?...What the fuck are you talking about??NO...they should not face any charges...the man was breaking the law and he resisted arrest...case closed....we must reinstall law enforcement authority or this will keep on happening....I wouldn't think of resisting a cop in any way...never have and never will I don't care how wrong they are....I will retract revenge in court in necessary but I will never disobey an order from a cop...would you?....Big tech didn't arrest him...the police did...At least its legal today...free speech is not...apparently....just ask big tech....But would looting a store hurt the darkie in the way he wanted??He should have burned and looted a store instead....that's legal today...free speech is not....
I mean he was really upset at the fact that darkies exist....don't know if looting a store would help that out....
Maybe he can start an organization that is devoted to doing something about the existence of darkies....but I doubt any such group like that is even possible....what would they even call it?
But you didn't mention them...why is this?
Don't you agree the police should face charges for what they did to this man??
I said the guy whom you claim had his "free speech" violated by big tech wasn't arrested by big tech, he was arrested by the police...
Why aren't you addressing your anger with the ACTUAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY that arrested him?
Someone somewhere probably rain out of gas too.Noel, Missouri just had one because it was a mosque.We don't engage in such behavior out here in little Podunk, USA. We like our town.I bet you didn't do it correctly by setting fire to an occupied building.How many times have we seen it done to prove the theory?How many times have you done it to prove your theory?He should have burned and looted a store instead....that's legal today...free speech is not....
Countless.
In other words....you think threatening to shoot people is protected free speech?Why was he arrested for words?....I didn't think that was allowed in a free nation....he didn't shout fire in a crowded room...so what gives?....but we see people burn and loot to their hearts content and get out of jail with a slap on the wrist....so what are you talking about?...What the fuck are you talking about??NO...they should not face any charges...the man was breaking the law and he resisted arrest...case closed....we must reinstall law enforcement authority or this will keep on happening....I wouldn't think of resisting a cop in any way...never have and never will I don't care how wrong they are....I will retract revenge in court in necessary but I will never disobey an order from a cop...would you?....Big tech didn't arrest him...the police did...At least its legal today...free speech is not...apparently....just ask big tech....But would looting a store hurt the darkie in the way he wanted??He should have burned and looted a store instead....that's legal today...free speech is not....
I mean he was really upset at the fact that darkies exist....don't know if looting a store would help that out....
Maybe he can start an organization that is devoted to doing something about the existence of darkies....but I doubt any such group like that is even possible....what would they even call it?
But you didn't mention them...why is this?
Don't you agree the police should face charges for what they did to this man??
I said the guy whom you claim had his "free speech" violated by big tech wasn't arrested by big tech, he was arrested by the police...
Why aren't you addressing your anger with the ACTUAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY that arrested him?
Stow man charged with yelling racist slurs, threatening to use AK-47 on DoorDash driver
A man who allegedly threatened to shoot a Black DoorDash driver has been arrested and charged with ethnic intimidation and aggravated menacing.www.beaconjournal.com
"A man caught on video threatening to shoot a Black Door Dash driver has been arrested and charged with ethnic intimidation, a fifth-degree felony, and aggravated menacing, a first-degree misdemeanor. James Rhodes, 53, pleaded not guilty to the misdemeanor, and the felony charge is being referred to a Summit County grand jury following a court appearance Tuesday.
Videos capture Rhodes getting out of his car, yelling at a woman and calling her a racial slur. He then states that he has an AK-47 in his car and threatens to use it on the woman. Subsequent videos show the man and other people yelling racially charged comments back and forth. According to a police report, the 22-year-old Akron woman had a 3-year-old boy in the car."
They literally arrested this guy for voicing his free speech; but they didn't arrest the darkie and that darkie loving **** for saying offensive and disrespectful things back to the man....with one calling the man a "white ass bitch" -- which is definitely more racially charged than anything he called them. As the man himself said, he is tired of n-words and if you add on top of that the fact he may have been having a bad day; it's perfectly understandable for him to threaten to shoot a darkie if he sees one -- and besides, this guy pays a $1000 a month in rent; something that darkie couldn't make in who knows how long...
How is it that the police aren't asking what the so-called DoorDash driver was doing before she started recording?? Was she engaging in some drug deal and Mr. Rhodes caught her?? What about the 3 yr old boy in the car, what did he do that could have provoked Mr. Rhodes?? This cancel culture is out of control because there was a time that you could get out of your car and threaten to shoot anyone you wanted if they made you mad enough.
How many "peaceful" protests have we seen where BLM members are calling for the killing of cops????? don't even try that with me asshole...I will eat your fucking lunch....how short and limited libs memories are with recent history....willfully blind is what I call it....The CURRENT OP is about a guy who was arrested for threatening to shoot people.....
No no no, the Muslims and them hindus follow their own rules pretty good.So are the muslims going to saw off someone's head, or burn them alive in a cage in response?Noel, Missouri just had one because it was a mosque.We don't engage in such behavior out here in little Podunk, USA. We like our town.I bet you didn't do it correctly by setting fire to an occupied building.How many times have we seen it done to prove the theory?How many times have you done it to prove your theory?He should have burned and looted a store instead....that's legal today...free speech is not....
Countless.
Obviously it is....if your are the right color and are threatening the right people....In other words....you think threatening to shoot people is protected free speech?Why was he arrested for words?....I didn't think that was allowed in a free nation....he didn't shout fire in a crowded room...so what gives?....but we see people burn and loot to their hearts content and get out of jail with a slap on the wrist....so what are you talking about?...What the fuck are you talking about??NO...they should not face any charges...the man was breaking the law and he resisted arrest...case closed....we must reinstall law enforcement authority or this will keep on happening....I wouldn't think of resisting a cop in any way...never have and never will I don't care how wrong they are....I will retract revenge in court in necessary but I will never disobey an order from a cop...would you?....Big tech didn't arrest him...the police did...At least its legal today...free speech is not...apparently....just ask big tech....But would looting a store hurt the darkie in the way he wanted??He should have burned and looted a store instead....that's legal today...free speech is not....
I mean he was really upset at the fact that darkies exist....don't know if looting a store would help that out....
Maybe he can start an organization that is devoted to doing something about the existence of darkies....but I doubt any such group like that is even possible....what would they even call it?
But you didn't mention them...why is this?
Don't you agree the police should face charges for what they did to this man??
I said the guy whom you claim had his "free speech" violated by big tech wasn't arrested by big tech, he was arrested by the police...
Why aren't you addressing your anger with the ACTUAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY that arrested him?
Cool.....the police disagrees.....
So should the police be brought up on charges for arresting this guy for threatening to shoot people?
"rain out of gay"????Someone somewhere probably rain out of gas too.Noel, Missouri just had one because it was a mosque.We don't engage in such behavior out here in little Podunk, USA. We like our town.I bet you didn't do it correctly by setting fire to an occupied building.How many times have we seen it done to prove the theory?How many times have you done it to prove your theory?He should have burned and looted a store instead....that's legal today...free speech is not....
Countless.
"I will eat your fucking lunch"???How many "peaceful" protests have we seen where BLM members are calling for the killing of cops????? don't even try that with me asshole...I will eat your fucking lunch....how short and limited libs memories are with recent history....willfully blind is what I call it....The CURRENT OP is about a guy who was arrested for threatening to shoot people.....
No, they only go after mosque in this area.Someone somewhere probably rain out of gas too.Noel, Missouri just had one because it was a mosque.We don't engage in such behavior out here in little Podunk, USA. We like our town.I bet you didn't do it correctly by setting fire to an occupied building.How many times have we seen it done to prove the theory?How many times have you done it to prove your theory?He should have burned and looted a store instead....that's legal today...free speech is not....
Countless.
Freudian slip."rain out of gay"????Someone somewhere probably rain out of gas too.Noel, Missouri just had one because it was a mosque.We don't engage in such behavior out here in little Podunk, USA. We like our town.I bet you didn't do it correctly by setting fire to an occupied building.How many times have we seen it done to prove the theory?How many times have you done it to prove your theory?He should have burned and looted a store instead....that's legal today...free speech is not....
Countless.
so you think the police were racist against the white guy when they arrested him??Obviously it is....if your are the right color and are threatening the right people....In other words....you think threatening to shoot people is protected free speech?Why was he arrested for words?....I didn't think that was allowed in a free nation....he didn't shout fire in a crowded room...so what gives?....but we see people burn and loot to their hearts content and get out of jail with a slap on the wrist....so what are you talking about?...What the fuck are you talking about??NO...they should not face any charges...the man was breaking the law and he resisted arrest...case closed....we must reinstall law enforcement authority or this will keep on happening....I wouldn't think of resisting a cop in any way...never have and never will I don't care how wrong they are....I will retract revenge in court in necessary but I will never disobey an order from a cop...would you?....Big tech didn't arrest him...the police did...At least its legal today...free speech is not...apparently....just ask big tech....But would looting a store hurt the darkie in the way he wanted??He should have burned and looted a store instead....that's legal today...free speech is not....
I mean he was really upset at the fact that darkies exist....don't know if looting a store would help that out....
Maybe he can start an organization that is devoted to doing something about the existence of darkies....but I doubt any such group like that is even possible....what would they even call it?
But you didn't mention them...why is this?
Don't you agree the police should face charges for what they did to this man??
I said the guy whom you claim had his "free speech" violated by big tech wasn't arrested by big tech, he was arrested by the police...
Why aren't you addressing your anger with the ACTUAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY that arrested him?
Cool.....the police disagrees.....
So should the police be brought up on charges for arresting this guy for threatening to shoot people?
How many times have we seen it done to prove the theory?How many times have you done it to prove your theory?He should have burned and looted a store instead....that's legal today...free speech is not....
Countless.
I was really looking for to my Chik Fil A sandwich.....but apparently Rambo here is planning to eat it......"I will eat your fucking lunch"???How many "peaceful" protests have we seen where BLM members are calling for the killing of cops????? don't even try that with me asshole...I will eat your fucking lunch....how short and limited libs memories are with recent history....willfully blind is what I call it....The CURRENT OP is about a guy who was arrested for threatening to shoot people.....
Why was he arrested for words?....I didn't think that was allowed in a free nation....he didn't shout fire in a crowded room...so what gives?....but we see people burn and loot to their hearts content and get out of jail with a slap on the wrist....so what are you talking about?...What the fuck are you talking about??NO...they should not face any charges...the man was breaking the law and he resisted arrest...case closed....we must reinstall law enforcement authority or this will keep on happening....I wouldn't think of resisting a cop in any way...never have and never will I don't care how wrong they are....I will retract revenge in court in necessary but I will never disobey an order from a cop...would you?....Big tech didn't arrest him...the police did...At least its legal today...free speech is not...apparently....just ask big tech....But would looting a store hurt the darkie in the way he wanted??He should have burned and looted a store instead....that's legal today...free speech is not....
I mean he was really upset at the fact that darkies exist....don't know if looting a store would help that out....
Maybe he can start an organization that is devoted to doing something about the existence of darkies....but I doubt any such group like that is even possible....what would they even call it?
But you didn't mention them...why is this?
Don't you agree the police should face charges for what they did to this man??
I said the guy whom you claim had his "free speech" violated by big tech wasn't arrested by big tech, he was arrested by the police...
Why aren't you addressing your anger with the ACTUAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY that arrested him?
I don't see skin color and I do not accuse people of racism....that's your skill set not mine....just because an arrest is made doesn't make it racism....how fucked up has the media made you?....listen to yourself...amazing...so you think the police were racist against the white guy when they arrested him??Obviously it is....if your are the right color and are threatening the right people....In other words....you think threatening to shoot people is protected free speech?Why was he arrested for words?....I didn't think that was allowed in a free nation....he didn't shout fire in a crowded room...so what gives?....but we see people burn and loot to their hearts content and get out of jail with a slap on the wrist....so what are you talking about?...What the fuck are you talking about??NO...they should not face any charges...the man was breaking the law and he resisted arrest...case closed....we must reinstall law enforcement authority or this will keep on happening....I wouldn't think of resisting a cop in any way...never have and never will I don't care how wrong they are....I will retract revenge in court in necessary but I will never disobey an order from a cop...would you?....Big tech didn't arrest him...the police did...At least its legal today...free speech is not...apparently....just ask big tech....But would looting a store hurt the darkie in the way he wanted??He should have burned and looted a store instead....that's legal today...free speech is not....
I mean he was really upset at the fact that darkies exist....don't know if looting a store would help that out....
Maybe he can start an organization that is devoted to doing something about the existence of darkies....but I doubt any such group like that is even possible....what would they even call it?
But you didn't mention them...why is this?
Don't you agree the police should face charges for what they did to this man??
I said the guy whom you claim had his "free speech" violated by big tech wasn't arrested by big tech, he was arrested by the police...
Why aren't you addressing your anger with the ACTUAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY that arrested him?
Cool.....the police disagrees.....
So should the police be brought up on charges for arresting this guy for threatening to shoot people?
Let's see.......what is the legal standard for aggravated menacing...
"(A) No person shall knowingly cause another to believe that the offender will cause serious physical harm to the person or property of the other person, the other person's unborn, or a member of the other person's immediate family. (B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of aggravated menacing."
Are you claiming the guy didn't actually threaten to shoot anyone and the police are framing him??
I don't eat fried chicken...keep it....I was really looking for to my Chik Fil A sandwich.....but apparently Rambo here is planning to eat it......"I will eat your fucking lunch"???How many "peaceful" protests have we seen where BLM members are calling for the killing of cops????? don't even try that with me asshole...I will eat your fucking lunch....how short and limited libs memories are with recent history....willfully blind is what I call it....The CURRENT OP is about a guy who was arrested for threatening to shoot people.....
But you just claimed that the reason the guy was arrested was because he wasn't the right color....I don't see skin color and I do not accuse people of racism....that's your skill set not mine....just because an arrest is made doesn't make it racism....how fucked up has the media made you?....listen to yourself...amazing...so you think the police were racist against the white guy when they arrested him??Obviously it is....if your are the right color and are threatening the right people....In other words....you think threatening to shoot people is protected free speech?Why was he arrested for words?....I didn't think that was allowed in a free nation....he didn't shout fire in a crowded room...so what gives?....but we see people burn and loot to their hearts content and get out of jail with a slap on the wrist....so what are you talking about?...What the fuck are you talking about??NO...they should not face any charges...the man was breaking the law and he resisted arrest...case closed....we must reinstall law enforcement authority or this will keep on happening....I wouldn't think of resisting a cop in any way...never have and never will I don't care how wrong they are....I will retract revenge in court in necessary but I will never disobey an order from a cop...would you?....Big tech didn't arrest him...the police did...At least its legal today...free speech is not...apparently....just ask big tech....But would looting a store hurt the darkie in the way he wanted??He should have burned and looted a store instead....that's legal today...free speech is not....
I mean he was really upset at the fact that darkies exist....don't know if looting a store would help that out....
Maybe he can start an organization that is devoted to doing something about the existence of darkies....but I doubt any such group like that is even possible....what would they even call it?
But you didn't mention them...why is this?
Don't you agree the police should face charges for what they did to this man??
I said the guy whom you claim had his "free speech" violated by big tech wasn't arrested by big tech, he was arrested by the police...
Why aren't you addressing your anger with the ACTUAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY that arrested him?
Cool.....the police disagrees.....
So should the police be brought up on charges for arresting this guy for threatening to shoot people?
Let's see.......what is the legal standard for aggravated menacing...
"(A) No person shall knowingly cause another to believe that the offender will cause serious physical harm to the person or property of the other person, the other person's unborn, or a member of the other person's immediate family. (B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of aggravated menacing."
Are you claiming the guy didn't actually threaten to shoot anyone and the police are framing him??
Apparently so if you are a BLM member threatening a cop....Why was he arrested for words?....I didn't think that was allowed in a free nation....he didn't shout fire in a crowded room...so what gives?....but we see people burn and loot to their hearts content and get out of jail with a slap on the wrist....so what are you talking about?...What the fuck are you talking about??NO...they should not face any charges...the man was breaking the law and he resisted arrest...case closed....we must reinstall law enforcement authority or this will keep on happening....I wouldn't think of resisting a cop in any way...never have and never will I don't care how wrong they are....I will retract revenge in court in necessary but I will never disobey an order from a cop...would you?....Big tech didn't arrest him...the police did...At least its legal today...free speech is not...apparently....just ask big tech....But would looting a store hurt the darkie in the way he wanted??He should have burned and looted a store instead....that's legal today...free speech is not....
I mean he was really upset at the fact that darkies exist....don't know if looting a store would help that out....
Maybe he can start an organization that is devoted to doing something about the existence of darkies....but I doubt any such group like that is even possible....what would they even call it?
But you didn't mention them...why is this?
Don't you agree the police should face charges for what they did to this man??
I said the guy whom you claim had his "free speech" violated by big tech wasn't arrested by big tech, he was arrested by the police...
Why aren't you addressing your anger with the ACTUAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY that arrested him?
So it is legal to threaten to shoot someone, as long as, you don't actually shoot them.
Guess that was an "empty threat" then...I don't eat fried chicken...keep it....I was really looking for to my Chik Fil A sandwich.....but apparently Rambo here is planning to eat it......"I will eat your fucking lunch"???How many "peaceful" protests have we seen where BLM members are calling for the killing of cops????? don't even try that with me asshole...I will eat your fucking lunch....how short and limited libs memories are with recent history....willfully blind is what I call it....The CURRENT OP is about a guy who was arrested for threatening to shoot people.....
