Oh look, more anti-free speech from Vance.

Those who were arrested in the UK and Germany were arrested by the government. Did Vance advocate arresting people for free speech?

Aren't you denying Vance's right to free speech?

Well, Vance is calling for accountability.

Is there no accountability for the VP of the US saying something hypocritical?

I didn't say we should lock Vance up for this, did I?

Is it the VP's job to tell companies to fire people for saying something they shouldn't? He's talking as the US Presidency, as part of the US government, not as an individual citizen.
 
Liar.

Vance wants to hold the left to the EXACT same Standard they hold to the Right.

You can say what you want, but you'll pay a consequence for it.


Or does that only apply to conservative white people?
Exactly. Two can play this game of ratting each other out. Funny how Democrats didn't give a damn ending the career of those speaking out against the vaccine and question Covid.
 
I'm watching this thread. Let's try to keep the personal attacks to a minimum here.

I'm not making this in red as this is a suggestion and not a command, yet.
 
Exactly. Two can play this game of ratting each other out. Funny how Democrats didn't give a damn ending the career of those speaking out against the vaccine and question Covid.

Do you think that treason also comes into this? Do you think that if, in times of war, someone loses their job because of TREASON that this would be an issue?
 
And if people don't parrot Vance's authoritarian craven rant, then what?

Look like good ole boy J.D. is demanding that citizens rat on their neighbors, families etc. for the betterment of the "State".

He's an authoritarian pig just like his Dear Leader.
Obama- I want you to get in their faces.



Go suck a dick.
 
Well, Vance is calling for accountability.

Is there no accountability for the VP of the US saying something hypocritical?

I didn't say we should lock Vance up for this, did I?

Is it the VP's job to tell companies to fire people for saying something they shouldn't? He's talking as the US Presidency, as part of the US government, not as an individual citizen.
He didn't send a decree to social media now did he? He has an opinion and so do you. Again, why are you trying to deny his right to free speech?
 
I'm sorry you are too stupid to understand what I said.
In your post you said 'they' want to ban gay marriage. You're too stupid to understand that gay marriage in the US is legal. You don't even tell us who 'they' are. All you're doing is spouting far left garbage.
 
Do you think that treason also comes into this? Do you think that if, in times of war, someone loses their job because of TREASON that this would be an issue?

I don't care for those cheering for China if the US goes to war with China. However, if their action, such as passing secret vital information to China about US ships movement, that's treason and deserved to be executed.
 

"Report those who celebrate Charlie Kirk death to employers, Vance says"

Yep, Vance wants to stop people saying negative things about Charlie Kirk.

""Call them out, and hell, call their employer," Vance said as he guest-hosted an episode of the Charlie Kirk Show. "We don't believe in political violence, but we do believe in civility.""

Apparently they believe in "civility" which is news to me.

This from a guy who called out the UK on freedom of speech.

JD Vance calls out UK’s ‘modern dystopia’ amid ‘sad decline’ in freedom of speech

Essentially the right want to control speech if they don't like it, and make it free if they do. Kind of fascist to me.
Get back to me when we start shooting them. While you're waiting... :fu:
 
He didn't send a decree to social media now did he? He has an opinion and so do you. Again, why are you denying his right to free speech?

Oh please, stop with the childish tactics.

He's the VP of the US. Do you think he gets to say whatever opinion he likes?

The US Supreme Court said that whatever the President does, in his role as President, is protected from prosecution. Why? Because the President is being the President. He can be taken down by Congress, not by the Judiciary.

When the VP or the President talk, they're talking as the Presidency, as the government. They don't get freedom of speech. Because they can't be prosecuted for freedom of speech.

If they make statements that are said in PUBLIC, they're doing they're job. Not being individual citizens.
 
I don't care for those cheering for China if the US goes to war with China. However, if their action, such as passing secret vital information to China about US ships movement, that's treason and deserved to be executed.

So, you'd say in times of emergency, freedom of speech is more limited than in times of peace?
 

"Report those who celebrate Charlie Kirk death to employers, Vance says"

Yep, Vance wants to stop people saying negative things about Charlie Kirk.

""Call them out, and hell, call their employer," Vance said as he guest-hosted an episode of the Charlie Kirk Show. "We don't believe in political violence, but we do believe in civility.""

Apparently they believe in "civility" which is news to me.

This from a guy who called out the UK on freedom of speech.

JD Vance calls out UK’s ‘modern dystopia’ amid ‘sad decline’ in freedom of speech

Essentially the right want to control speech if they don't like it, and make it free if they do. Kind of fascist to me.
hes going for the leftist vote by pushing their ideology..
 
The problem is that the right's version of "freedom of speech" when it comes to being racist, sexist etc, means no accoutability.

Vance attacked the UK


"“I believe that dismissing people, dismissing their concerns or worse yet, shutting down media, shutting down elections or shutting people out of the political process protects nothing. In fact, it is the most surefire way to destroy democracy,” he said."

This is what he says he "believes", now all of a sudden he "believes" the exact opposite.

This is hypocrisy and it's designed to get what the right want. They are for total freedom of speech when it comes to racism, and they're against it when it comes to people talking about the death of Charlie Kirk.
Is it hard to breathe when you talk out of your ass like that?
 
15th post
So, you'd say in times of emergency, freedom of speech is more limited than in times of peace?
You're confusing free speech with treason. However, I am sure you know the difference but trying for that slippery slope fallacy.
 
The problem is that the right's version of "freedom of speech" when it comes to being racist, sexist etc, means no accoutability.
Did you miss all the people on the right that were fired, harassed and threatened over the last 10 or so years by the cancel culture warriors for statements that were labelled with the various "ists" you mentioned?

Many of the leading voices on the left can barely finish a sentence without accusing someone on the right of some "ism", it's gotten so old most normal people don't pay any attention to it anymore nor do they care. The nation is suffering from a pandemic of far left-wing lunatic fatigue and those who choose to celebrate Charlie Kirk's murder in public are starting to pay the price.

It's not the optimal situation but it certainly is justified.

FAFO: Left Wing Asshole Edition.
 
Freedom of speech doesn't come with freedom from accountability for what you say; so sayeth the left wing cancel culture warriors who, by the way, just got cancelled. :cool:
I think you need to apply that to Charlie Kirk and other right-wing nuckle-dragging bigots.
 
Back
Top Bottom