Maybe we should be more concerned with whether he had them,
He had to prove he didn't have them.
He agreed to prove that by allowing unlimited inspections.
Then he stopped inspectors from doing their jobs.
He fucked up, eh?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Maybe we should be more concerned with whether he had them,
Yeah, it was. Trump's tactless comments caused our NATO partners to avoid dealing with the U.S. Trump accomplished nothing but caused a major division within NATO.By telling NATO members to meet their spending committments? Yeah, that was awful!
Trump's tactless comments caused our NATO partners to avoid dealing with the U.S.
Is that all you have to say to my report? Well, at least you commented. The rest of the Republicans here avoided my report. It dealt with what is happening now. They preferred talking about the past.By telling NATO members to meet their spending committments? Yeah, that was awful!
Was Vladimir Putin delighted when Trump resisted his new natural gas pipeline?
Trump's tactless comments caused our NATO partners to avoid dealing with the U.S.
Were they spending more on defense?
When did they stop "dealing with the US"?
Any specifics?
"Many countries owe us a tremendous amount of money from many years back, where they're delinquent as far as I'm concerned, because the United States has had to pay for them. So if you go back 10 or 20 years, you'll just add it all up, it's massive amounts of money is owed."
"Germany is just paying a little bit over 1 percent, whereas the United States in actual numbers is paying 4.2 percent."
"We're paying for anywhere from 70 to 90 percent to protect Europe, and that's fine."
"This year, since our last meeting, commitments have been made for over $40 billion more money spent by other countries."
I read your posts and you don't realize how obsessed you are with skin color.I am guessing you are a whitey but what ever color you are, you are obviously EXTREMELY dumb. Those who think the color iof your skin determines your intelligence and your heart are the very worst among us, no matter what color they are.Because Whitey is smart and Darky is dumb?Blues Legend, you are a sad, sorry human, so misguided. I am guessing you sincerely feel you are right. But so do many of the most disgusting humans that go down as being on the wrong side of history.Lets see that's 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 total out of millions of Conservatives. Broad brush much?Now you are just making shit up. Okay name them back up your statement or run away with your tail tucked between your legs.You are in la la land. The same fucking assholes who cozied up to Bush to push wartime propaganda are the same assholes you listen to now about stolen elections.Improve your reading comprehension, ask your teacher for help if you need it.No, you must just a kid then. Anyone who was alive back in 2003 remembers Cheney and Fox News revving up the war machine, and lying about WMD, Scott Ritter and any Democrat who dare oppose the war. Ask your mother or father about it.Your opinion is wrong, try again.Your post is a lie. But just like you, conservatives were the biggest supporters of the WMD lies as they are of the election fraud lie. Sean Hannity and every other conservative was on the news spouting you are “either with us or against us.” Conservative liars were everyone branding any opponent of the war as a traitor.Conservatives called BS on WMD's and that war and the BS $78B Cheney said it would cost and on the claim we'd get that money back from Iraq. Dems were too gutless to stand their ground, folded like a cheap lawn chair voting for war and continued funding.Just curious. Where do you stand on invading a country based on bullshit evidence of WMDs?They should have put Truman on trial for war crimes after he ordered Dresden to be firebombed. Burned thousands of innocent men, women & children alive for no other reason then to extract vengeance. He destroyed & burned to the ground the most beautiful city in Europe. One of the most tragic events of ww2.Eisenhower new Dem hero, the man who on orders from a Dem president burned 100's of thousands of men, women, and children alive during WWII firebombing raids.
It was already done for you. An entire news network to include Hannity and Bill O'reilly, How about Ann Coulter or Rush Limbaugh? Michelle Malkin ring a bell? Glenn Beck ring a bell?
You are a white nationalist. History is littered with the the embarrasment of white nationalism. All are an embarrassment to the countries they lived in and to all white people.
Is that all you have to say to my report? Well, at least you commented. The rest of the Republicans here avoided my report. It dealt with what is happening now. They preferred talking about the past.By telling NATO members to meet their spending committments? Yeah, that was awful!
Was Vladimir Putin delighted when Trump resisted his new natural gas pipeline?
I posted the report twice. I simply can't get Republicans here to defend their own party.
NATO members did make a commitment four years ago to spend at least 2 percent of their GDP on defense by 2024.
NATO members did make a commitment four years ago to spend at least 2 percent of their GDP on defense by 2024.
Because they weren't meeting their commitment targets, just as Trump said.
Jesus Christ on a bike you dumb fucking animal....What's your excuse for the millions of people living in poverty in Alabammy, Ole Miss., Goegia, Arkansass & other red states, you low I.Q. inbred Trumpturd?After 10's of trillions of dollars minorities and the poor are stick stuck on your Dem inner city plantations OWN IT!morality does not change with time you immoral piece of crap.It's not 1956 you knucklehead and we have since spent TRILLIONS on these issues.
I live like a KING in Arkansas, on 1/3 the income it took to live like a pauper in the beyond-dysfunctional greater Boston area. Anyone who stays in these psychotic Leftist hellholes deserves to have some BLM nutcase ruin their overpriced restaurant dinner!What's your excuse for the millions of people living in poverty in Alabammy, Ole Miss., Goegia, Arkansass & other red states, you low I.Q. inbred Trumpturd?After 10's of trillions of dollars minorities and the poor are stick stuck on your Dem inner city plantations OWN IT!morality does not change with time you immoral piece of crap.It's not 1956 you knucklehead and we have since spent TRILLIONS on these issues.
NATO members did make a commitment four years ago to spend at least 2 percent of their GDP on defense by 2024.
Because they weren't meeting their commitment targets, just as Trump said.
Four years ago. You just quoted (from an article but you attributed it to me) something that disproved your statement. Before Trump was president NATO members already committed to spend at least 2% of their GDP by 2024. That's why they all looked at him like a loon during that one press conference, it's like he was lecturing them for something that is already planned out.
Bush and Obama were already hammering other NATO members to pick up the slack and during the Obama administration they agreed by 2024 to do just that.
I know I'm repeating myself but I'm hoping at least one of those two statements above makes it to your brain.
They already made a commitment to for 2% by 2024 before Trump was in office. He literally did nothing but alienate us from our allies.NATO members did make a commitment four years ago to spend at least 2 percent of their GDP on defense by 2024.
Because they weren't meeting their commitment targets, just as Trump said.
Four years ago. You just quoted (from an article but you attributed it to me) something that disproved your statement. Before Trump was president NATO members already committed to spend at least 2% of their GDP by 2024. That's why they all looked at him like a loon during that one press conference, it's like he was lecturing them for something that is already planned out.
Bush and Obama were already hammering other NATO members to pick up the slack and during the Obama administration they agreed by 2024 to do just that.
I know I'm repeating myself but I'm hoping at least one of those two statements above makes it to your brain.
Before Trump was president NATO members already committed to spend at least 2% of their GDP by 2024.
They were supposed to be spending at least 2%, according to their 2006 agreement.
I hope Trump didn't hurt their feelings when he said, in 2018, they still weren't meeting their NATO
commitments.
They already made a commitment to for 2% by 2024 before Trump was in office. He literally did nothing but alienate us from our allies.NATO members did make a commitment four years ago to spend at least 2 percent of their GDP on defense by 2024.
Because they weren't meeting their commitment targets, just as Trump said.
Four years ago. You just quoted (from an article but you attributed it to me) something that disproved your statement. Before Trump was president NATO members already committed to spend at least 2% of their GDP by 2024. That's why they all looked at him like a loon during that one press conference, it's like he was lecturing them for something that is already planned out.
Bush and Obama were already hammering other NATO members to pick up the slack and during the Obama administration they agreed by 2024 to do just that.
I know I'm repeating myself but I'm hoping at least one of those two statements above makes it to your brain.
Before Trump was president NATO members already committed to spend at least 2% of their GDP by 2024.
They were supposed to be spending at least 2%, according to their 2006 agreement.
I hope Trump didn't hurt their feelings when he said, in 2018, they still weren't meeting their NATO
commitments.
I've already provided a link.They already made a commitment to for 2% by 2024 before Trump was in office. He literally did nothing but alienate us from our allies.NATO members did make a commitment four years ago to spend at least 2 percent of their GDP on defense by 2024.
Because they weren't meeting their commitment targets, just as Trump said.
Four years ago. You just quoted (from an article but you attributed it to me) something that disproved your statement. Before Trump was president NATO members already committed to spend at least 2% of their GDP by 2024. That's why they all looked at him like a loon during that one press conference, it's like he was lecturing them for something that is already planned out.
Bush and Obama were already hammering other NATO members to pick up the slack and during the Obama administration they agreed by 2024 to do just that.
I know I'm repeating myself but I'm hoping at least one of those two statements above makes it to your brain.
Before Trump was president NATO members already committed to spend at least 2% of their GDP by 2024.
They were supposed to be spending at least 2%, according to their 2006 agreement.
I hope Trump didn't hurt their feelings when he said, in 2018, they still weren't meeting their NATO
commitments.
They already made a commitment to for 2% by 2024
They already made a commitment for 2% back in 2006.
I hope Trump didn't hurt their freeloading feelings.
I've already provided a link.They already made a commitment to for 2% by 2024 before Trump was in office. He literally did nothing but alienate us from our allies.NATO members did make a commitment four years ago to spend at least 2 percent of their GDP on defense by 2024.
Because they weren't meeting their commitment targets, just as Trump said.
Four years ago. You just quoted (from an article but you attributed it to me) something that disproved your statement. Before Trump was president NATO members already committed to spend at least 2% of their GDP by 2024. That's why they all looked at him like a loon during that one press conference, it's like he was lecturing them for something that is already planned out.
Bush and Obama were already hammering other NATO members to pick up the slack and during the Obama administration they agreed by 2024 to do just that.
I know I'm repeating myself but I'm hoping at least one of those two statements above makes it to your brain.
Before Trump was president NATO members already committed to spend at least 2% of their GDP by 2024.
They were supposed to be spending at least 2%, according to their 2006 agreement.
I hope Trump didn't hurt their feelings when he said, in 2018, they still weren't meeting their NATO
commitments.
They already made a commitment to for 2% by 2024
They already made a commitment for 2% back in 2006.
I hope Trump didn't hurt their freeloading feelings.
I'm referring to their 2014 pledge of 2%. Trump didn't didn't do that.I've already provided a link.They already made a commitment to for 2% by 2024 before Trump was in office. He literally did nothing but alienate us from our allies.NATO members did make a commitment four years ago to spend at least 2 percent of their GDP on defense by 2024.
Because they weren't meeting their commitment targets, just as Trump said.
Four years ago. You just quoted (from an article but you attributed it to me) something that disproved your statement. Before Trump was president NATO members already committed to spend at least 2% of their GDP by 2024. That's why they all looked at him like a loon during that one press conference, it's like he was lecturing them for something that is already planned out.
Bush and Obama were already hammering other NATO members to pick up the slack and during the Obama administration they agreed by 2024 to do just that.
I know I'm repeating myself but I'm hoping at least one of those two statements above makes it to your brain.
Before Trump was president NATO members already committed to spend at least 2% of their GDP by 2024.
They were supposed to be spending at least 2%, according to their 2006 agreement.
I hope Trump didn't hurt their feelings when he said, in 2018, they still weren't meeting their NATO
commitments.
They already made a commitment to for 2% by 2024
They already made a commitment for 2% back in 2006.
I hope Trump didn't hurt their freeloading feelings.
Did your link mention the 2006 agreement?
I'm referring to their 2014 pledge of 2%. Trump didn't didn't do that.I've already provided a link.They already made a commitment to for 2% by 2024 before Trump was in office. He literally did nothing but alienate us from our allies.NATO members did make a commitment four years ago to spend at least 2 percent of their GDP on defense by 2024.
Because they weren't meeting their commitment targets, just as Trump said.
Four years ago. You just quoted (from an article but you attributed it to me) something that disproved your statement. Before Trump was president NATO members already committed to spend at least 2% of their GDP by 2024. That's why they all looked at him like a loon during that one press conference, it's like he was lecturing them for something that is already planned out.
Bush and Obama were already hammering other NATO members to pick up the slack and during the Obama administration they agreed by 2024 to do just that.
I know I'm repeating myself but I'm hoping at least one of those two statements above makes it to your brain.
Before Trump was president NATO members already committed to spend at least 2% of their GDP by 2024.
They were supposed to be spending at least 2%, according to their 2006 agreement.
I hope Trump didn't hurt their feelings when he said, in 2018, they still weren't meeting their NATO
commitments.
They already made a commitment to for 2% by 2024
They already made a commitment for 2% back in 2006.
I hope Trump didn't hurt their freeloading feelings.
Did your link mention the 2006 agreement?
Oh, how the Republican party has changed.
Dwight Eisenhower, Ronald Reagan and Abraham Lincoln are rolling over in their graves. Even Richard Nixon is rolling over in his grave at the embarrassment of what the Republican party has turned into.
View attachment 502949