I will stop hating the yankees when those ******* steinbrenners stop being greedy and selfish and encourage revenue sharing and getting rid of free agency.The second highest salaried team the red sox dont even come close to the payroll the yankees have.
2010 Baseball Team Payrolls - Total and Average Salaries for Major League Baseball Players
AGAIN,something you yankee apologists always ignore is the yankees are the ONLY team that can afford to keep a-rod at his salary he has.A few years ago when he was struggling in the playoffs against the indians and he was voicing how he would like to be traded because of how the fans were getting on him,the announcers themselves came on and said the yankees are the only team who could afford to sign him. AGAIN teams like the royals cannot afford to develop a player such as Johnny Damon and keep him because of payrolls.They dont have the luxary of developing and keeping players like Derek Jeeter like the yankees do. The Rangers have done an outstanding job of getting to the series on a low payroll but look for free agency to break up those players in the next couple of years because they dont have the payroll to keep them.
the rangers have done an outstanding job?
are you smoking crack?
they claimed bankruptcy and signed cliff lee...how is that fiscally responsible?
they made it to the world series despite one of the lowest payrolls in the major leagues.I would say thats an outstanding job.

it payed off,got them to their first world series ever.

again like all yankee apologist do,you avoid the points on how its not fair the way they have it set up in the major leagues unlike it is in the NFL.
You talk about avoiding points yet you totally disregarded the fact that the rangers FILED BANKRUPTCY, then proceeded to sign Cliff Lee.
The Yankees play by the rules, do you hear the Pirates, Marlins, and Royals cry woe is me when they recieves their millions from Revenue sharing?
Also, i don't know if you have noticed but Major League Baseball in their unfair system has provided just as much if not more diversity in champions then NFL and WAYYYYYY more then the NBA.
The NBA is a joke, it's the same teams over and over again, you go back 30 years and its like 7 teams that have won the championship.
Throughout the past 10 years Baseball has given you many different championship teams from large to small market.
Yankees is a large market in 2000
Diamondback were small in 2001
Angels were a small market when they won it in 2002
Marlins in 2003 were small in 03
Red Sox t in 04
White Sox in 05
Cardnials in 06
Red Sox in 07
Phillies in 08
Yankees in 09
Giants or Rangers in 2010
Thats pretty god damn diverse if you ask me, and mixed with small market clubs and large.
Not to mention you had very small payroll teams in the playoffs such as the oakland A's, Twins, Marlins, Padres etc...
NFL in the past 10 years you had the Patriots appear in 4 of those superbowls winning 3 of them...The Colts in one and always in the playoffs year in and year out, winning 1 superbowl and losing another.
Steelers winning 2 superbowls.
so please spare me, Major League baseball I will argue has provided more diversity in champions ranging from large and small market teams then the NFL has