Andrew2382
Gold Member
- Oct 1, 2008
- 3,994
- 551
- 153
- Thread starter
- #601
all i want to know is if you still trade matt cain for albert pujols
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
We'll see. you could be right. But we won't make the same mistake we made with rowand and zito. I could forsee a maximum 3 year deal with Konerko because of his age. To the tune of 9 or 10 million should suffice. But who knows anything
all i want to know is if you still trade matt cain for albert pujols
We'll see. you could be right. But we won't make the same mistake we made with rowand and zito. I could forsee a maximum 3 year deal with Konerko because of his age. To the tune of 9 or 10 million should suffice. But who knows anything
Your mistake with Rowand is only realized in hindsight, though.
The guy looked like a potential star. He gives up the body, he hits for average, he's got a gold glove, and he can hit for power and drive in runs. He can even steal some bases too.
5/60 wasn't a bad contract at all. He just turned out to be a fraud who stepped it up only when the money was on the line.
Zito's problem is that he's a surfer FIRST, and then a baseball player. He wanted to stay in the bay area so he could still surf.
He should have gone somewhere where there were no waves and he had no other choice but to focus on baseball. But he wouldn't have allowed that anyway.
He actually started out pretty well this year. I thought maybe he was coming around. But I just don't think his heart is really in baseball.
Why are you so quick to pass on Huff, though? Just out of curiosity. You could probably have him cheaper than Konerko.
all i want to know is if you still trade matt cain for albert pujols
I already said no to this. I said yes in 2009 because the everyday offense wasn't good enough to get them TO THE playoffs. Now the offense is good enough so we don't need to trade pitching for bats.
Ok ladies, the best time of year is almost upon us. Get your gloves and bats and be safe out there!
Predictions:
AL East:
Yankees 100-62
Red Sox 95-67
Rays 88-74
Blue Jays 77-84
Orioles 70-92
AL Central:
Twins 84-79
Tigers 83-80
White Sox 75-87
Indians 68-94
Royals 65-97
AL West:
Mariners 88-74
Angels 87-75
Rangers 83-79
Athletics 77-85
Wild Card: Red Sox
National League
NL East:
Phillies 92-70
Marlins 86-76
Mets 85-77
Braves 83-79
Nationals 60-102
NL Central:
Cardinals 97-65
Reds 90-72
Cubs 82-80
Brewers 79-83
Astros 76-86
Pirates 69-93
NL West
Dodgers 94-68
Diamondbacks 91-71
Giants 88-74
Rockies 81-81
Padres 72-90
Wild Card: D-backs
ALDS: Yankees over Twins in 3
ALDS: Sox over Mariners in 4
NLDS: Phillies over Dodgers in 4
NLDS: Cardinals over D-backs in 4
ALCS: Yankees over Sox in 7
NLCS: Phillies over Cards in 6
World Series:
Yankees over Phillies in 6
I have a feeling about the Mariners taking the west this year...I am sure come july/august I will look back at this and say "WHAT THE FUCK WAS I THINKING WITH SOME OF THESE PICKS"
Edit: my NL west was all fucked up...
all i want to know is if you still trade matt cain for albert pujols
I already said no to this. I said yes in 2009 because the everyday offense wasn't good enough to get them TO THE playoffs. Now the offense is good enough so we don't need to trade pitching for bats.
You don't get it though.
If you had gotten to the playoffs and then didn't have that same pitching prowess, your chances of winning it all greatly diminish.
In the playoffs it's all about the pitching.
You can sneak INTO the playoffs without it, but it's hard to win 5 and 7 game series when the other team that has better pitching is shutting down your lineup.
You didn't score a whole hell of a lot of runs against us. It was your PITCHING that won you the NLCS.
What are you guys gonna do with Ross?
He's arb eligible. You gonna offer him a contract or let him go to arb?
MLBTradeRumors has the Giants offering him a contract this offseason, and Ross has been pressing Uggla to sign there as well.
You could move Sanchez to SS, and let Uribe go.
Thoughts?
I already said no to this. I said yes in 2009 because the everyday offense wasn't good enough to get them TO THE playoffs. Now the offense is good enough so we don't need to trade pitching for bats.
You don't get it though.
If you had gotten to the playoffs and then didn't have that same pitching prowess, your chances of winning it all greatly diminish.
In the playoffs it's all about the pitching.
You can sneak INTO the playoffs without it, but it's hard to win 5 and 7 game series when the other team that has better pitching is shutting down your lineup.
You didn't score a whole hell of a lot of runs against us. It was your PITCHING that won you the NLCS.
No I think you're the one not "getting it". What does any of it matter if you can't get TO the playoffs? I'd rather be this years Reds playing than last year's Giants fishing.
Fortunately we added just enough offense last year to get to the playoffs. No we don't need to trade pitching.
You don't get it though.
If you had gotten to the playoffs and then didn't have that same pitching prowess, your chances of winning it all greatly diminish.
In the playoffs it's all about the pitching.
You can sneak INTO the playoffs without it, but it's hard to win 5 and 7 game series when the other team that has better pitching is shutting down your lineup.
You didn't score a whole hell of a lot of runs against us. It was your PITCHING that won you the NLCS.
No I think you're the one not "getting it". What does any of it matter if you can't get TO the playoffs? I'd rather be this years Reds playing than last year's Giants fishing.
Fortunately we added just enough offense last year to get to the playoffs. No we don't need to trade pitching.
Yeah, and last year I was suggesting that instead of offing Cain, you simply pick up a decent mid-range bat that wouldn't cost and arm and a leg.
I'm not exactly sure what you added from last year dollar-wise, but it wasn't a whole hell of a lot.
The whole point is that you were trying to get rid of the one thing you needed in the playoffs...a stellar arm.
You can sneak into the playoffs much easier than you can get all the way through them.
Anybody have an educated guess as to who's going to sign Cliff Lee? MLB trade rumors says that Cashman is meeting with Lee today... but god I hope he doesn't go with the Yanks.
Can't believe Jeter won a Gold Glove this year.
According to Todd Zolecki of MLB.com, the belief is that Jayson Werth could seek a contract similar to the seven-year, $120 million deal Matt Holliday received from the Cardinals last winter.
Scott Boras stated his new client’s case for big dollars on Friday.
“We have, in my mind, probably the most coveted offensive player in the free-agent market,” Boras said. “Carl Crawford is a really great player, but the truth of the matter is, Werth scores as many runs, and his on-base percentage is the same. Werth is a guy that can play center field and has played center field recently. He’s a Gold Glove-type outfielder. Crawford is, too. But the big difference is that Werth has 87 home runs over the last three years and Crawford has 42. Werth is really a middle-of-the-lineup guy. I think when he bats third, he’ll be a 110-to-120-runs-scored guy and a 100-RBI guy. And I think teams that are looking for a right-handed bat view Werth as a middle-of-the-lineup guy.”
Hey Truth, check this out:
Just like I was saying!
Scott Boras is looking for Matt Holliday money for Jayson Werth | HardballTalk
According to Todd Zolecki of MLB.com, the belief is that Jayson Werth could seek a contract similar to the seven-year, $120 million deal Matt Holliday received from the Cardinals last winter.
Scott Boras stated his new clients case for big dollars on Friday.
We have, in my mind, probably the most coveted offensive player in the free-agent market, Boras said. Carl Crawford is a really great player, but the truth of the matter is, Werth scores as many runs, and his on-base percentage is the same. Werth is a guy that can play center field and has played center field recently. Hes a Gold Glove-type outfielder. Crawford is, too. But the big difference is that Werth has 87 home runs over the last three years and Crawford has 42. Werth is really a middle-of-the-lineup guy. I think when he bats third, hell be a 110-to-120-runs-scored guy and a 100-RBI guy. And I think teams that are looking for a right-handed bat view Werth as a middle-of-the-lineup guy.
He drives a hard bargain!!
What a waste of money that's going to be!!!