Obama's job growth were part-time jobs...partially due to Obamacare!

[edthecynic]

I don't know whose numbers are the 'real' numbers, but I do know this. Give your money to the government = prosperity. That there is 100% communomics. Do the lefties deny Obamacare decimated work hours?

Of course! It is a Right-wing lie believed only by STUPID SUCKERS!
Do you believe it?

 

[edthecynic]

How many times are you worthless lying scum POS right-wingers going to mindlessly parrot this LIE?????
As you well know PT jobs for economic reasons went DOWN after the passage of the PPACA!!!!!

LIE

Already PROVEN to be true with actual BLS data. Try a new lie!

2009

Jan-8675
Feb-9053
March-9168
April-8556
May-8663
June-9190
July-8977
Aug-8712
Sept-8134
Oct-8350
Nov-8796
Dec-9222

2010

9161
9108
9210
8830
8392
8734
8610
8509
8540
8279
8526
9029

2011

9027
8633
8537
8305
8144
8600
8372
8463
8423
8151
8161
8259

2012

8747
8302
7753
7581
7736
8268
8218
7723
8003
7768
7898
8038

2013

8506
8163
7598
7590
7523
8328
8207
7567
7437
7628
7478
7848

2014

7617
7269
7321
7120
6917
7706
7568
7021
6618
6698
6597
6855

PPACA passed the end of March 2010 and your numbers show that at 9,210,000 and you end at 6,855,000 which sure seems LOWER to me, which means PT jobs for economic reasons DECREASED after Obama Care passed!!!!!

Your numbers show me you're confused

Not millions, thousands

Those were monthly figures from BLS for PT economic reasons

BLS

I choose non agricultural

Why is it always the confused Right who tell everyone else that they are the ones confused???
The BLS says the numbers are in thousands which means you add 3 zeros at the end, so 1,000 thousands is 1,000,000.
From your link:
Number in thousands

 

[airplanemechanic]

I can back up the OP with another article from investing.com WHILE OBAMA WAS STILL IN OFFICE:

Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract

A study done by economists at Harvard and Princeton agree that 95% of Obamajobs were part time or short-term contract work.

And lets not forget Obama's "shovel ready jobs" that never existed and his "green jobs" deal that he shoved billions into and those companies all went under. Telling us to get used to 1% GDP? Obama ran on saying he could turn the economy around. Instead he presided over the slowest economic recovery in the history of our nation. But he was half-black, he had that going for him.Oh yea, remember Obama asking where the magic wand was that was going to bring all these manufacturing jobs back?

Well Obama I can tell you where the magic wand is. In the White House.

 

[edthecynic]

I can back up the OP with another article from investing.com WHILE OBAMA WAS STILL IN OFFICE:

Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract

A study done by economists at Harvard and Princeton agree that 95% of Obamajobs were part time or short-term contract work.

That is the same discredited RAND "study" again being passed off as coming from Harvard to give the FAKE study an air of legitimacy, posted earlier in this thread and debunked in every detail already in this very thread.
What planet have you been on?????

 

[keepitreal]

LIE

Already PROVEN to be true with actual BLS data. Try a new lie!

2009

Jan-8675
Feb-9053
March-9168
April-8556
May-8663
June-9190
July-8977
Aug-8712
Sept-8134
Oct-8350
Nov-8796
Dec-9222

2010

9161
9108
9210
8830
8392
8734
8610
8509
8540
8279
8526
9029

2011

9027
8633
8537
8305
8144
8600
8372
8463
8423
8151
8161
8259

2012

8747
8302
7753
7581
7736
8268
8218
7723
8003
7768
7898
8038

2013

8506
8163
7598
7590
7523
8328
8207
7567
7437
7628
7478
7848

2014

7617
7269
7321
7120
6917
7706
7568
7021
6618
6698
6597
6855

PPACA passed the end of March 2010 and your numbers show that at 9,210,000 and you end at 6,855,000 which sure seems LOWER to me, which means PT jobs for economic reasons DECREASED after Obama Care passed!!!!!

Your numbers show me you're confused

Not millions, thousands

Those were monthly figures from BLS for PT economic reasons

BLS

I choose non agricultural

Why is it always the confused Right who tell everyone else that they are the ones confused???
The BLS says the numbers are in thousands which means you add 3 zeros at the end, so 1,000 thousands is 1,000,000.
From your link:
Number in thousands

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

 

[edthecynic]

Already PROVEN to be true with actual BLS data. Try a new lie!

2009

Jan-8675
Feb-9053
March-9168
April-8556
May-8663
June-9190
July-8977
Aug-8712
Sept-8134
Oct-8350
Nov-8796
Dec-9222

2010

9161
9108
9210
8830
8392
8734
8610
8509
8540
8279
8526
9029

2011

9027
8633
8537
8305
8144
8600
8372
8463
8423
8151
8161
8259

2012

8747
8302
7753
7581
7736
8268
8218
7723
8003
7768
7898
8038

2013

8506
8163
7598
7590
7523
8328
8207
7567
7437
7628
7478
7848

2014

7617
7269
7321
7120
6917
7706
7568
7021
6618
6698
6597
6855

PPACA passed the end of March 2010 and your numbers show that at 9,210,000 and you end at 6,855,000 which sure seems LOWER to me, which means PT jobs for economic reasons DECREASED after Obama Care passed!!!!!

Your numbers show me you're confused

Not millions, thousands

Those were monthly figures from BLS for PT economic reasons

BLS

I choose non agricultural

Why is it always the confused Right who tell everyone else that they are the ones confused???
The BLS says the numbers are in thousands which means you add 3 zeros at the end, so 1,000 thousands is 1,000,000.
From your link:
Number in thousands

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

That's right, Sherlock.

Notice how the Right would rather play dumb than admit they were wrong, even though it contradicts their rants that they are the "high-information voters" and everyone who disagrees with them are "low-information voters."

So when the BLS gives you a number like 6855 which you posted, and says the numbers charted are in the thousands, then that means 6855 thousands which is 6,855,000.
Get it??????

 

[keepitreal]

2009

Jan-8675
Feb-9053
March-9168
April-8556
May-8663
June-9190
July-8977
Aug-8712
Sept-8134
Oct-8350
Nov-8796
Dec-9222

2010

9161
9108
9210
8830
8392
8734
8610
8509
8540
8279
8526
9029

2011

9027
8633
8537
8305
8144
8600
8372
8463
8423
8151
8161
8259

2012

8747
8302
7753
7581
7736
8268
8218
7723
8003
7768
7898
8038

2013

8506
8163
7598
7590
7523
8328
8207
7567
7437
7628
7478
7848

2014

7617
7269
7321
7120
6917
7706
7568
7021
6618
6698
6597
6855

PPACA passed the end of March 2010 and your numbers show that at 9,210,000 and you end at 6,855,000 which sure seems LOWER to me, which means PT jobs for economic reasons DECREASED after Obama Care passed!!!!!

Your numbers show me you're confused

Not millions, thousands

Those were monthly figures from BLS for PT economic reasons

BLS

I choose non agricultural

Why is it always the confused Right who tell everyone else that they are the ones confused???
The BLS says the numbers are in thousands which means you add 3 zeros at the end, so 1,000 thousands is 1,000,000.
From your link:
Number in thousands

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

That's right, Sherlock.

Notice how the Right would rather play dumb than admit they were wrong, even though it contradicts their rants that they are the "high-information voters" and everyone who disagrees with them are "low-information voters."

So when the BLS gives you a number like 6855 which you posted, and says the numbers charted are in the thousands, then that means 6855 thousands which is 6,855,000.
Get it??????

So when the BLS gives you a number like 6855 which you posted, and says the numbers charted are in the thousands, then that means 6855 thousands which is 6,855,000.
Get it??????

6,855 is 6 thousand 8 hundred and 55
6,855,000 is 6 million 855 thousand

 

[keepitreal]

2009

Jan-8675
Feb-9053
March-9168
April-8556
May-8663
June-9190
July-8977
Aug-8712
Sept-8134
Oct-8350
Nov-8796
Dec-9222

2010

9161
9108
9210
8830
8392
8734
8610
8509
8540
8279
8526
9029

2011

9027
8633
8537
8305
8144
8600
8372
8463
8423
8151
8161
8259

2012

8747
8302
7753
7581
7736
8268
8218
7723
8003
7768
7898
8038

2013

8506
8163
7598
7590
7523
8328
8207
7567
7437
7628
7478
7848

2014

7617
7269
7321
7120
6917
7706
7568
7021
6618
6698
6597
6855

PPACA passed the end of March 2010 and your numbers show that at 9,210,000 and you end at 6,855,000 which sure seems LOWER to me, which means PT jobs for economic reasons DECREASED after Obama Care passed!!!!!

Your numbers show me you're confused

Not millions, thousands

Those were monthly figures from BLS for PT economic reasons

BLS

I choose non agricultural

Why is it always the confused Right who tell everyone else that they are the ones confused???
The BLS says the numbers are in thousands which means you add 3 zeros at the end, so 1,000 thousands is 1,000,000.
From your link:
Number in thousands

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

That's right, Sherlock.

Notice how the Right would rather play dumb than admit they were wrong, even though it contradicts their rants that they are the "high-information voters" and everyone who disagrees with them are "low-information voters."

So when the BLS gives you a number like 6855 which you posted, and says the numbers charted are in the thousands, then that means 6855 thousands which is 6,855,000.
Get it??????

Get it?

 

[edthecynic]

PPACA passed the end of March 2010 and your numbers show that at 9,210,000 and you end at 6,855,000 which sure seems LOWER to me, which means PT jobs for economic reasons DECREASED after Obama Care passed!!!!!

Your numbers show me you're confused

Not millions, thousands

Those were monthly figures from BLS for PT economic reasons

BLS

I choose non agricultural

Why is it always the confused Right who tell everyone else that they are the ones confused???
The BLS says the numbers are in thousands which means you add 3 zeros at the end, so 1,000 thousands is 1,000,000.
From your link:
Number in thousands

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

That's right, Sherlock.

Notice how the Right would rather play dumb than admit they were wrong, even though it contradicts their rants that they are the "high-information voters" and everyone who disagrees with them are "low-information voters."

So when the BLS gives you a number like 6855 which you posted, and says the numbers charted are in the thousands, then that means 6855 thousands which is 6,855,000.
Get it??????

So when the BLS gives you a number like 6855 which you posted, and says the numbers charted are in the thousands, then that means 6855 thousands which is 6,855,000.
Get it??????

6,855 is 6 thousand 8 hundred and 55
6,855,000 is 6 million 855 thousand

Damn you are milking the dumb act to death.
At the top of the chart YOU linked to it says this:
Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Series Id: LNS12032197
Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Seas) Employment Level - Part-Time for Economic Reasons, Nonagricultural Industries
Labor force status: Employed
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over
Industry: Nonagriculture industries
Reasons work not as scheduled: Economic reasons
Worker status/schedules: At work part time

That means that every number in every decimal place stands for 1,000, thus 6,855 in the chart is 6,855 thousands, not 6.855 thousand.

 

[edthecynic]

PPACA passed the end of March 2010 and your numbers show that at 9,210,000 and you end at 6,855,000 which sure seems LOWER to me, which means PT jobs for economic reasons DECREASED after Obama Care passed!!!!!

Your numbers show me you're confused

Not millions, thousands

Those were monthly figures from BLS for PT economic reasons

BLS

I choose non agricultural

Why is it always the confused Right who tell everyone else that they are the ones confused???
The BLS says the numbers are in thousands which means you add 3 zeros at the end, so 1,000 thousands is 1,000,000.
From your link:
Number in thousands

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

That's right, Sherlock.

Notice how the Right would rather play dumb than admit they were wrong, even though it contradicts their rants that they are the "high-information voters" and everyone who disagrees with them are "low-information voters."

So when the BLS gives you a number like 6855 which you posted, and says the numbers charted are in the thousands, then that means 6855 thousands which is 6,855,000.
Get it??????

Get it?

IDIOT!
The Right try to beat you into submission with their STUPIDITY!!!!!!

 

[DustyInfinity]

I don't know whose numbers are the 'real' numbers, but I do know this. Give your money to the government = prosperity. That there is 100% communomics. Do the lefties deny Obamacare decimated work hours?

Of course! It is a Right-wing lie believed only by STUPID SUCKERS!
Do you believe it?

Only anecdotal, but many of the people in my area got their hours slashed when obamacare hit. Do I believe it, I actually saw it. I don't find it hard to believe that this happened in more places around the country. You call it a lie, I call it something I saw with my own eyes.

 

[edthecynic]

I don't know whose numbers are the 'real' numbers, but I do know this. Give your money to the government = prosperity. That there is 100% communomics. Do the lefties deny Obamacare decimated work hours?

Of course! It is a Right-wing lie believed only by STUPID SUCKERS!
Do you believe it?

Only anecdotal, but many of the people in my area got their hours slashed when obamacare hit. Do I believe it, I actually saw it. I don't find it hard to believe that this happened in more places around the country. You call it a lie, I call it something I saw with my own eyes.

Every Right-winger claims they saw it with their own eyes, but yet there is absolutely NO data to back up what they claim to see.
What does that say about the credibility of the Right?????

 

[keepitreal]

Your numbers show me you're confused

Not millions, thousands

Those were monthly figures from BLS for PT economic reasons

BLS

I choose non agricultural

Why is it always the confused Right who tell everyone else that they are the ones confused???
The BLS says the numbers are in thousands which means you add 3 zeros at the end, so 1,000 thousands is 1,000,000.
From your link:
Number in thousands

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

That's right, Sherlock.

Notice how the Right would rather play dumb than admit they were wrong, even though it contradicts their rants that they are the "high-information voters" and everyone who disagrees with them are "low-information voters."

So when the BLS gives you a number like 6855 which you posted, and says the numbers charted are in the thousands, then that means 6855 thousands which is 6,855,000.
Get it??????

So when the BLS gives you a number like 6855 which you posted, and says the numbers charted are in the thousands, then that means 6855 thousands which is 6,855,000.
Get it??????

6,855 is 6 thousand 8 hundred and 55
6,855,000 is 6 million 855 thousand

Damn you are milking the dumb act to death.
At the top of the chart YOU linked to it says this:
Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Series Id: LNS12032197
Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Seas) Employment Level - Part-Time for Economic Reasons, Nonagricultural Industries
Labor force status: Employed
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over
Industry: Nonagriculture industries
Reasons work not as scheduled: Economic reasons
Worker status/schedules: At work part time

That means that every number in every decimal place stands for 1,000, thus 6,855 in the chart is 6,855 thousands, not 6.855 thousand.

WHAT?

Let's try this....

Please write it out using letters not numbers
adding 3 zeros like you said

 

[edthecynic]

Why is it always the confused Right who tell everyone else that they are the ones confused???
The BLS says the numbers are in thousands which means you add 3 zeros at the end, so 1,000 thousands is 1,000,000.
From your link:
Number in thousands

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

That's right, Sherlock.

Notice how the Right would rather play dumb than admit they were wrong, even though it contradicts their rants that they are the "high-information voters" and everyone who disagrees with them are "low-information voters."

So when the BLS gives you a number like 6855 which you posted, and says the numbers charted are in the thousands, then that means 6855 thousands which is 6,855,000.
Get it??????

So when the BLS gives you a number like 6855 which you posted, and says the numbers charted are in the thousands, then that means 6855 thousands which is 6,855,000.
Get it??????

6,855 is 6 thousand 8 hundred and 55
6,855,000 is 6 million 855 thousand

Damn you are milking the dumb act to death.
At the top of the chart YOU linked to it says this:
Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Series Id: LNS12032197
Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Seas) Employment Level - Part-Time for Economic Reasons, Nonagricultural Industries
Labor force status: Employed
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over
Industry: Nonagriculture industries
Reasons work not as scheduled: Economic reasons
Worker status/schedules: At work part time

That means that every number in every decimal place stands for 1,000, thus 6,855 in the chart is 6,855 thousands, not 6.855 thousand.

WHAT?

Let's try this....

Please write it out using letters not numbers
adding 3 zeros like you said

six thousand and 8 hundred and fifty-five THOUSANDS (PLURAL).
Jesus you are thick!!!!!
What do you think the chart means when it says "NUMBER IN THE THOUSANDS (PLURAL)?????
Why would they tell you the number is in the thousands if it is already six thousand eight hundred and fifty-five?????

 

[DustyInfinity]

I don't know whose numbers are the 'real' numbers, but I do know this. Give your money to the government = prosperity. That there is 100% communomics. Do the lefties deny Obamacare decimated work hours?

Of course! It is a Right-wing lie believed only by STUPID SUCKERS!
Do you believe it?

Only anecdotal, but many of the people in my area got their hours slashed when obamacare hit. Do I believe it, I actually saw it. I don't find it hard to believe that this happened in more places around the country. You call it a lie, I call it something I saw with my own eyes.

Every Right-winger claims they saw it with their own eyes, but yet there is absolutely NO data to back up what they claim to see.
What does that say about the credibility of the Right?????

What does that say about your data. All republicans are wrong to believe what they saw, but you are right because you got some stats from democrat cooked sources?

 

[edthecynic]

I don't know whose numbers are the 'real' numbers, but I do know this. Give your money to the government = prosperity. That there is 100% communomics. Do the lefties deny Obamacare decimated work hours?

Of course! It is a Right-wing lie believed only by STUPID SUCKERS!
Do you believe it?

Only anecdotal, but many of the people in my area got their hours slashed when obamacare hit. Do I believe it, I actually saw it. I don't find it hard to believe that this happened in more places around the country. You call it a lie, I call it something I saw with my own eyes.

Every Right-winger claims they saw it with their own eyes, but yet there is absolutely NO data to back up what they claim to see.
What does that say about the credibility of the Right?????

What does that say about your data. All republicans are wrong to believe what they saw, but you are right because you got some stats from democrat cooked sources?

And there it is, any real data that contradicts Right-wing unproven lies is cooked by Democrats.
The perfect catch-22 for SUCKERS!

Funny how now even Tramp says the BLS numbers are suddenly accurate.
You can't claim Tramp's BLS numbers are right for Tramp, but wrong for everyone else!

 

[keepitreal]

2009

Jan-8675
Feb-9053
March-9168
April-8556
May-8663
June-9190
July-8977
Aug-8712
Sept-8134
Oct-8350
Nov-8796
Dec-9222

2010

9161
9108
9210
8830
8392
8734
8610
8509
8540
8279
8526
9029

2011

9027
8633
8537
8305
8144
8600
8372
8463
8423
8151
8161
8259

2012

8747
8302
7753
7581
7736
8268
8218
7723
8003
7768
7898
8038

2013

8506
8163
7598
7590
7523
8328
8207
7567
7437
7628
7478
7848

2014

7617
7269
7321
7120
6917
7706
7568
7021
6618
6698
6597
6855

PPACA passed the end of March 2010 and your numbers show that at 9,210,000 and you end at 6,855,000 which sure seems LOWER to me, which means PT jobs for economic reasons DECREASED after Obama Care passed!!!!!

Your numbers show me you're confused

Not millions, thousands

Those were monthly figures from BLS for PT economic reasons

BLS

I choose non agricultural

Why is it always the confused Right who tell everyone else that they are the ones confused???
The BLS says the numbers are in thousands which means you add 3 zeros at the end, so 1,000 thousands is 1,000,000.
From your link:
Number in thousands

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

That's right, Sherlock.

Notice how the Right would rather play dumb than admit they were wrong, even though it contradicts their rants that they are the "high-information voters" and everyone who disagrees with them are "low-information voters."

So when the BLS gives you a number like 6855 which you posted, and says the numbers charted are in the thousands, then that means 6855 thousands which is 6,855,000.
Get it??????

Or, 685,500

 

[edthecynic]

PPACA passed the end of March 2010 and your numbers show that at 9,210,000 and you end at 6,855,000 which sure seems LOWER to me, which means PT jobs for economic reasons DECREASED after Obama Care passed!!!!!

Your numbers show me you're confused

Not millions, thousands

Those were monthly figures from BLS for PT economic reasons

BLS

I choose non agricultural

Why is it always the confused Right who tell everyone else that they are the ones confused???
The BLS says the numbers are in thousands which means you add 3 zeros at the end, so 1,000 thousands is 1,000,000.
From your link:
Number in thousands

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

That's right, Sherlock.

Notice how the Right would rather play dumb than admit they were wrong, even though it contradicts their rants that they are the "high-information voters" and everyone who disagrees with them are "low-information voters."

So when the BLS gives you a number like 6855 which you posted, and says the numbers charted are in the thousands, then that means 6855 thousands which is 6,855,000.
Get it??????

Or, 685,500

No, the BLS chart would have then said "numbers in the hundreds."

 

[keepitreal]

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

That's right, Sherlock.

Notice how the Right would rather play dumb than admit they were wrong, even though it contradicts their rants that they are the "high-information voters" and everyone who disagrees with them are "low-information voters."

So when the BLS gives you a number like 6855 which you posted, and says the numbers charted are in the thousands, then that means 6855 thousands which is 6,855,000.
Get it??????

So when the BLS gives you a number like 6855 which you posted, and says the numbers charted are in the thousands, then that means 6855 thousands which is 6,855,000.
Get it??????

6,855 is 6 thousand 8 hundred and 55
6,855,000 is 6 million 855 thousand

Damn you are milking the dumb act to death.
At the top of the chart YOU linked to it says this:
Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Series Id: LNS12032197
Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Seas) Employment Level - Part-Time for Economic Reasons, Nonagricultural Industries
Labor force status: Employed
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over
Industry: Nonagriculture industries
Reasons work not as scheduled: Economic reasons
Worker status/schedules: At work part time

That means that every number in every decimal place stands for 1,000, thus 6,855 in the chart is 6,855 thousands, not 6.855 thousand.

WHAT?

Let's try this....

Please write it out using letters not numbers
adding 3 zeros like you said

six thousand and 8 hundred and fifty-five THOUSANDS (PLURAL).
Jesus you are thick!!!!!
What do you think the chart means when it says "NUMBER IN THE THOUSANDS (PLURAL)?????
Why would they tell you the number is in the thousands if it is already six thousand eight hundred and fifty-five?????

They tell you its in thousands so you know

How can you have 6 thousand and 855 thousands
when the latter is greater than than 6 thousand

Why not say 6 thousands than, plural means more than 1

 

[keepitreal]

Your numbers show me you're confused

Not millions, thousands

Those were monthly figures from BLS for PT economic reasons

BLS

I choose non agricultural

Why is it always the confused Right who tell everyone else that they are the ones confused???
The BLS says the numbers are in thousands which means you add 3 zeros at the end, so 1,000 thousands is 1,000,000.
From your link:
Number in thousands

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

That's right, Sherlock.

Notice how the Right would rather play dumb than admit they were wrong, even though it contradicts their rants that they are the "high-information voters" and everyone who disagrees with them are "low-information voters."

So when the BLS gives you a number like 6855 which you posted, and says the numbers charted are in the thousands, then that means 6855 thousands which is 6,855,000.
Get it??????

Or, 685,500

No, the BLS chart would have then said "numbers in the hundreds."

So, write out for me 6855 in hundreds and millions, please and thank you