easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,233
- 2,645
The latest example is the $2.2 billion Ivanpah solar thermal plant in California. (Note: Solar thermal plants do not use solar panels to directly convert sunshine to electricity; they use sunshine to boil water that then drives conventional turbines.)
Here’s the story so far. Ivanpah…
Ivanpah has fallen woefully short of its production targets. The managers’ explanation for why production came up 32 percent below expected output is the weather. In addition to raising questions about planning for uncertainty, it is not all that clear how a nine-percent drop in sunshine causes a 32-percent drop in production.
More bizarrely, the natural gas used to get the plant all warmed up and ready each day would be enough to generate over one quarter of the power actually produced from the solar energy.
The problem for Ivanpah’s customers (California power utilities) is that they planned on all those solar watt-hours to meet California’s renewable power mandates, which require that renewables produce a large and rising fraction of California’s electricity. That is why they pay so much more for Ivanpah’s output than for conventionally powered electricity.
Breaching their contracts with these California utilities threatened to shut down Ivanpah. More likely than permanently shutting Ivanpah down would have been a change of ownership at a price that came closer to reflecting reality.
But this would have been bothersome for Ivanpah’s investors and the Department of Energy’s ridiculous Section 1703 Loan Program, so the California Public Utilities Commission saved the day (for the fat-cat owners, of course, not for actual the electricity consumers) by granting the company an extension to meet the production targets.
-------------
So, once again - as with what happened with Solyndra and 12 other 'Green Energy' companies going bankrupt, which threatened all the millions invested by 'big time' Obama donors - tax payers are called upon (yet not consulted) to take in the proverbial shorts - losing millions of THEIR money so rich investors do not lose THEIR money.
So exactly how much is this going to cost tax payers? In the immortal words of Nancy Pelosi, discussing what was in the ACA legislation edict they were ramming into law against the will of the majority of Americans who opposed it at the time, 'You don't have the right to know.'
"ESTIMATED COST: Actual cost of the Forbearance Agreements are confidential at this time."
So if you woke up this morning, feeling a little sore like you had been 'violated' in your sleep....now you know why.
Got to love our government and those who can just reach into our pockets any time they want for any reason they want...
Here’s the story so far. Ivanpah…
- is owned by Google, NRG Energy, and Brightsource, who have a market cap in excess of $500 billion.
- received $1.6 billion in loan guarantees from the Department of Energy.
- is paid four to five times as much per megawatt-hour as natural gas-powered plants.
- is paid two to three times as much per megawatt-hour as other solar power producers.
- has burned thousands of birds to death.
- has delayed loan repayments.
- is seeking over $500 million in grants to help pay off the guaranteed loans.
- burns natural gas for 4.5 hours each morning to get its mojo going.
Ivanpah has fallen woefully short of its production targets. The managers’ explanation for why production came up 32 percent below expected output is the weather. In addition to raising questions about planning for uncertainty, it is not all that clear how a nine-percent drop in sunshine causes a 32-percent drop in production.
More bizarrely, the natural gas used to get the plant all warmed up and ready each day would be enough to generate over one quarter of the power actually produced from the solar energy.
The problem for Ivanpah’s customers (California power utilities) is that they planned on all those solar watt-hours to meet California’s renewable power mandates, which require that renewables produce a large and rising fraction of California’s electricity. That is why they pay so much more for Ivanpah’s output than for conventionally powered electricity.
Breaching their contracts with these California utilities threatened to shut down Ivanpah. More likely than permanently shutting Ivanpah down would have been a change of ownership at a price that came closer to reflecting reality.
But this would have been bothersome for Ivanpah’s investors and the Department of Energy’s ridiculous Section 1703 Loan Program, so the California Public Utilities Commission saved the day (for the fat-cat owners, of course, not for actual the electricity consumers) by granting the company an extension to meet the production targets.
-------------
So, once again - as with what happened with Solyndra and 12 other 'Green Energy' companies going bankrupt, which threatened all the millions invested by 'big time' Obama donors - tax payers are called upon (yet not consulted) to take in the proverbial shorts - losing millions of THEIR money so rich investors do not lose THEIR money.
So exactly how much is this going to cost tax payers? In the immortal words of Nancy Pelosi, discussing what was in the ACA legislation edict they were ramming into law against the will of the majority of Americans who opposed it at the time, 'You don't have the right to know.'
"ESTIMATED COST: Actual cost of the Forbearance Agreements are confidential at this time."
So if you woke up this morning, feeling a little sore like you had been 'violated' in your sleep....now you know why.
Got to love our government and those who can just reach into our pockets any time they want for any reason they want...