obama sure can bring out the crazy people can't he

About Boston Bombings:

1) The Government did not know that these terrorist attacks were going to happen, proving all their liberty destroying policies don't work.

2) The Government did know this terrorist attack was going to happen, and decided to allow it to proceed, in order to take away more liberties.

Which one makes you feel better?

Obviously ONE of those statements is true, but...

If you accept either as true, you're crazy!

Either they did, or they didn't! I'm CRAZY!
 
obama has pushed and pushed chaos, and divisiveness for 5 years now and the pigeons are coming home to roost.

Jesus said it best, Wisdom is justified by her children
 
2nd Amendment, how do you explain this:

Cops in Detroit, NY and LA......they KNOW a violent crime will occur this week. They KNOW for sure it will, in their city. When? Where? By who? Why? That they dont know.

So....should we slash funding for their PD's since they cant predict the crime's exact location, time and suspect? Or, should we maintain it, so they can try their best to respond and prevent crime?

Thats basically what you are saying. That law enforcement should be able to predict crime to the point that they stop every crime, or otherwise it is a waste of money.
 
2nd Amendment, how do you explain this:

Cops in Detroit, NY and LA......they KNOW a violent crime will occur this week. They KNOW for sure it will, in their city. When? Where? By who? Why? That they dont know.

So....should we slash funding for their PD's since they cant predict the crime's exact location, time and suspect? Or, should we maintain it, so they can try their best to respond and prevent crime?

Thats basically what you are saying. That law enforcement should be able to predict crime to the point that they stop every crime, or otherwise it is a waste of money.

What I'm saying is that the Boston Bombing Massacre better not be used as an excuse to take away more of our liberties.

Because:

1) If the Government didn't know this was going to happen, with all their Patriot Act, NDAA, DHS Gestapo, IRS e-mail hacking, etc; then it proves their civil liberty devouring programs don't work.

2) If the Government did know, well fuck, why would we give them more control over us?


So take your choice, of either 1 or 2, they both lead to the same conclusion, that we should not trade more of our liberty for security.


------------------------

However, I know you're a clever person, so you already knew what I was implying. You know that you're not part of the elite power structure right? Why do you defend them?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
2nd Amendment, how do you explain this:

Cops in Detroit, NY and LA......they KNOW a violent crime will occur this week. They KNOW for sure it will, in their city. When? Where? By who? Why? That they dont know.

So....should we slash funding for their PD's since they cant predict the crime's exact location, time and suspect? Or, should we maintain it, so they can try their best to respond and prevent crime?

Thats basically what you are saying. That law enforcement should be able to predict crime to the point that they stop every crime, or otherwise it is a waste of money.

Isn't that exactly why people are saying about the gun issue? Of course it is. Barring a person walking around with armed security, the Police aren't going to be there to protect people when violence decides to show up at a person's doorstep.
 
2nd Amendment, how do you explain this:

Cops in Detroit, NY and LA......they KNOW a violent crime will occur this week. They KNOW for sure it will, in their city. When? Where? By who? Why? That they dont know.

So....should we slash funding for their PD's since they cant predict the crime's exact location, time and suspect? Or, should we maintain it, so they can try their best to respond and prevent crime?

Thats basically what you are saying. That law enforcement should be able to predict crime to the point that they stop every crime, or otherwise it is a waste of money.

Isn't that exactly why people are saying about the gun issue? Of course it is. Barring a person walking around with armed security, the Police aren't going to be there to protect people when violence decides to show up at a person's doorstep.

Bucs just killed all of his Gun Control arguments. Good observation.

Double time!


 
Last edited by a moderator:
2nd Amendment, how do you explain this:

Cops in Detroit, NY and LA......they KNOW a violent crime will occur this week. They KNOW for sure it will, in their city. When? Where? By who? Why? That they dont know.

So....should we slash funding for their PD's since they cant predict the crime's exact location, time and suspect? Or, should we maintain it, so they can try their best to respond and prevent crime?

Thats basically what you are saying. That law enforcement should be able to predict crime to the point that they stop every crime, or otherwise it is a waste of money.

Isn't that exactly why people are saying about the gun issue? Of course it is. Barring a person walking around with armed security, the Police aren't going to be there to protect people when violence decides to show up at a person's doorstep.

Bucs just killed all of his Gun Control arguments. Good observation.

Nahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.....that happened, late last-night.....

 
obama has pushed and pushed chaos, and divisiveness for 5 years now and the pigeons are coming home to roost.

Jesus said it best, Wisdom is justified by her children
Jesus (actually) sounded like a Teabagger (makin'-up shit)?????

Where, in the Good Book, might we find that???
 
obama sure can bring out the crazy people can't he

New-York-Post-cover-via-Newseum-270x300.jpg


April 18, 2013

Shameless Paper In MINDLESS Fog

"If our culture allowed diseased newspapers to be quarantined, I’d have the New York Post kenneled right now."

:eusa_whistle:
 

Forum List

Back
Top