Obama: Iran has a "right" to nuclear energy

Environmentalists are very good at using legislation and government to curtail projects such as this. I'm not saying this is the case here, but they have done it in the past. Research would have to be done as to who was behind enacting the legislation that would have prevented the company from recovering some of it's costs. Why was such a law enacted, what was the logic, etc... There's a ton of politics and money behind a lot of these decisions.


************, THIS had nothing to do with environmentalists. Nothing at all. Not one goddamn iota of this had to do with tree huggers. THIS was the direct failure of Ameren UE as a company to fund it's own venture. I don't give a **** what "they" have done in the past. IM telling you that Missouri almost had another Nuke plant despite the bullshit rhetorical nonsense you dumb bitches keep quoting. END of ******* story.


And, for real, dude.. your retarded ******* boogeyman paranoia doesn't float in the Show Me State. No one wants to pay for a ******* nuke plant that is ONLY an investment for Ameren EU. Rates would have gone up AND we'd enjoy a nice tax to boot. I guess if you need to see gremelins then so be it.


Oh c'mon now, play nice. :lol: I agree with you for the most part. But, you can't deny that there is a lot of money and campaign funding going on by environmentalist groups in this country to get legislation passed that helps to curtail industry that they would like to see stopped. I said that research would have to go into what was behind the decision that was made. Do you know why the legislation was changed at the last minute? Did you read the article and how it talked about the 6 BILLION dollar cost to build a nuclear facility? Do you have any of the answers for that? That's all I asked. I hear what you're saying about taxes, but with cap and trade coming down the pike and the demonization of coal, do you really think that's going to be any cheaper when they're done with that??

And dude, I'm not a dude, I'm a dudette.... :lol:


Yes. the short answer is that MISSOURI doesn't want the very consumers who must pay in a natural monopoly to have to ALSO pay for AMERENS investment. It's pretty simple, really. This is the Show Me state.. Not the Hey, Lets All Get Fucked In The Ass By A Utility Company state.
 
************, THIS had nothing to do with environmentalists. Nothing at all. Not one goddamn iota of this had to do with tree huggers. THIS was the direct failure of Ameren UE as a company to fund it's own venture. I don't give a **** what "they" have done in the past. IM telling you that Missouri almost had another Nuke plant despite the bullshit rhetorical nonsense you dumb bitches keep quoting. END of ******* story.


And, for real, dude.. your retarded ******* boogeyman paranoia doesn't float in the Show Me State. No one wants to pay for a ******* nuke plant that is ONLY an investment for Ameren EU. Rates would have gone up AND we'd enjoy a nice tax to boot. I guess if you need to see gremelins then so be it.


Oh c'mon now, play nice. :lol: I agree with you for the most part. But, you can't deny that there is a lot of money and campaign funding going on by environmentalist groups in this country to get legislation passed that helps to curtail industry that they would like to see stopped. I said that research would have to go into what was behind the decision that was made. Do you know why the legislation was changed at the last minute? Did you read the article and how it talked about the 6 BILLION dollar cost to build a nuclear facility? Do you have any of the answers for that? That's all I asked. I hear what you're saying about taxes, but with cap and trade coming down the pike and the demonization of coal, do you really think that's going to be any cheaper when they're done with that??

And dude, I'm not a dude, I'm a dudette.... :lol:


Yes. the short answer is that MISSOURI doesn't want the very consumers who must pay in a natural monopoly to have to ALSO pay for AMERENS investment. It's pretty simple, really. This is the Show Me state.. Not the Hey, Lets All Get Fucked In The Ass By A Utility Company state.

Fair enough. But, like I said, if Obama's cap and trade scheme goes thru, they're probably going to wish they had the nuclear facility at some point.
 
you really don't think Iran will develop a nuke?

I think Iran will have less of a reason to if we deflated conflict in the mid east instead of sat by while israel decides to use Hagee type american support to act like a moder nazi germany. If we prove to Iranians that we are NOT the zionist puppets that we currently are and promote the kind of plurality in palisrael that we find HERE then we have a lot more to sell to the next iranian generation than the constant daily jpost threat of (ironic) attack.

there is a reason why iranian jews won't migrate back to israel and it has nothing to do with crying antisemite at every corner.

once again... you're butt backwards about who the aggressors are.

you really need to learn history and get over your hatred of Israel because it isn't one of the double digit number of Arab States.

Get over it.


yea jill.. the DAILY call for military strikes in iran from the JEWPOST sure doesn't indicate who the agressors are. The CONSTANT warped use of propaganda quotes sure doesn't tell us who feels like they need to twist reality.

I know I know.. crying antisemite works better than quoting A-jad's actual quote or admitting which is the ONLY nation to call for war, by proxy or otherwise, during the last 5 years... I know I know.. while enjoying more euqlity here in the US than she'll require for her pet zion nation, no less.


*yawn*


a zionist jew calls someone an antisemite to deflect attention from israel. news at 10.
 
Last edited:
I think Iran will have less of a reason to if we deflated conflict in the mid east instead of sat by while israel decides to use Hagee type american support to act like a moder nazi germany. If we prove to Iranians that we are NOT the zionist puppets that we currently are and promote the kind of plurality in palisrael that we find HERE then we have a lot more to sell to the next iranian generation than the constant daily jpost threat of (ironic) attack.

there is a reason why iranian jews won't migrate back to israel and it has nothing to do with crying antisemite at every corner.

once again... you're butt backwards about who the aggressors are.

you really need to learn history and get over your hatred of Israel because it isn't one of the double digit number of Arab States.

Get over it.


yea jill.. the DAILY call for military strikes in iran from the JEWPOST sure doesn't indicate who the agressors are. The CONSTANT warped use of propaganda quotes sure doesn't tell us who feels like they need to twist reality.

I know I know.. crying antisemite works better than quoting A-jad's actual quote or admitting which is the ONLY nation to call for war, by proxy or otherwise, during the last 5 years... I know I know.. while enjoying more euqlity here in the US than she'll require for her pet zion nation, no less.


*yawn*


a zionist jew calls someone an antisemite to deflect attention from israel. news at 10.

So, what concern is it of A-jad's what Israel does or what the Palestinians do? Why does he care to begin with? Shouldn't he just mind his own business?
 
i don't think anyone has a "right" to nuclear energy....if it is a right...where did the right come from
 
i don't think anyone has a "right" to nuclear energy....if it is a right...where did the right come from

national sovereignty


Tell me, what nation do you want telling the US what it can and cant have?
 
once again... you're butt backwards about who the aggressors are.

you really need to learn history and get over your hatred of Israel because it isn't one of the double digit number of Arab States.

Get over it.


yea jill.. the DAILY call for military strikes in iran from the JEWPOST sure doesn't indicate who the agressors are. The CONSTANT warped use of propaganda quotes sure doesn't tell us who feels like they need to twist reality.

I know I know.. crying antisemite works better than quoting A-jad's actual quote or admitting which is the ONLY nation to call for war, by proxy or otherwise, during the last 5 years... I know I know.. while enjoying more euqlity here in the US than she'll require for her pet zion nation, no less.


*yawn*


a zionist jew calls someone an antisemite to deflect attention from israel. news at 10.

So, what concern is it of A-jad's what Israel does or what the Palestinians do? Why does he care to begin with? Shouldn't he just mind his own business?

gosh, noob, can you say that with a strat face after telling me what jews and christians in AMERICA should care about jews and christians in the mid east? Why does John Hagee, or DaveS for that matter, CARE about a bunch of jews in isreal? Shouldn't THEY just mind their own business? Are muslims too inhuman to be concerned with the treatment of other muslims and the precedence set by the creation of a little third riech of zionism?
 
Lots. You need to see Cast "dead pali" lead images? Just say the word.

depends on whether you're going to show blown up Jewish school kids and babies in carriages along with that, doesn't it?

oh wait... we're talking about you.

Oh you mean all SEVEN of them which, apparently, came to a retail price of not less than 1 THOUSAND PLUS dead palis?


thats quite a bargain you snagged there!


:thup:
 
i don't think anyone has a "right" to nuclear energy....if it is a right...where did the right come from

national sovereignty


Tell me, what nation do you want telling the US what it can and cant have?

We don't need another nation telling the US what it can't have. The current POTUS has it covered.

well then I guess the question is answered regarding the right of Iran to pursue nuclear energy then.
 
15th post
i don't think anyone has a "right" to nuclear energy....if it is a right...where did the right come from

national sovereignty


Tell me, what nation do you want telling the US what it can and cant have?

national sovereignty is not a right

I never said it was; rather, it's what gives Iran the RIGHT to persue nuclear energy. You asked where the right came from. The answer is National Sovereignty. And, i'll ask again, what nation or global authority are ready to allow jurisdiction over the USA? Feel free to answer without some half assed sidestep.
 
See above. Iran is under no requirement to use oil just because YOU think they should tap as much of their resources as YOU think is necessary. Funny, you bring up how the US can't, apparently, drill.. validating the same strategy in America.. yet you ***** about Iran conserving their resources. hilarious.

and, I posted earlier in this thread where the local Nuke plant had every green light to build another plant but THEY could not afford it. If you want to continue with the crybaby "we cant build nuclear" shit then be my guest.

Not a surprise that you completely ignored the point.

The fact is they dont have a legitimate need for it. You cant deny it. You can try to change the subject all you want. But they still dont have a need for it.

And we arent arent constrained with any sort of stragety not to drill for oil. The only reason we cant drill for oil is because crazy leftists like yourself ***** and moan about phoney environmental concerns. For some reason, you guys think its a better idea for old people to freeze and starve then for us to drill for oil.

How about this, Ill consider allowing Iran to develop nuclear reactors when you allow Americans to drill for oil in our own backyard.
 
yea jill.. the DAILY call for military strikes in iran from the JEWPOST sure doesn't indicate who the agressors are. The CONSTANT warped use of propaganda quotes sure doesn't tell us who feels like they need to twist reality.

I know I know.. crying antisemite works better than quoting A-jad's actual quote or admitting which is the ONLY nation to call for war, by proxy or otherwise, during the last 5 years... I know I know.. while enjoying more euqlity here in the US than she'll require for her pet zion nation, no less.


*yawn*


a zionist jew calls someone an antisemite to deflect attention from israel. news at 10.

So, what concern is it of A-jad's what Israel does or what the Palestinians do? Why does he care to begin with? Shouldn't he just mind his own business?

gosh, noob, can you say that with a strat face after telling me what jews and christians in AMERICA should care about jews and christians in the mid east? Why does John Hagee, or DaveS for that matter, CARE about a bunch of jews in isreal? Shouldn't THEY just mind their own business? Are muslims too inhuman to be concerned with the treatment of other muslims and the precedence set by the creation of a little third riech of zionism?


I'm just trying to understand where your position stems from? Is the root cause the fact that they were granted that land by the U.N. in 1948, is that what you have issue with? I've seen you make comments regarding Israeli/Palistinian conflict and it's apparent who's side you're on, just wondering where your stance find its origins?
 
Show me the laws that define who is a "GLOBAL FELON". You dumb bastards are why the lure of phantom WMDs worked hook line and sinker.

And you are why 911 happened.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom