Obama gives finger to Constitution with proposed “promise zones”

johnwk

Gold Member
May 24, 2009
4,046
1,937
200
See: Obama to unveil “promise zone” economic initiative


”Joined by local leaders at the White House, Mr. Obama will officially announce the administration’s first five “promise zones” -- pockets of the country that will receive comprehensive federal assistance after being especially hard-hit by the recession. The five zones will be located in San Antonio, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, Southeastern Kentucky and the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma. The administration aims to ultimately assist 20 such regions.”


Once again our President, instead of adopting national policies removing the iron fist of our federal government from America’s free enterprise system and its businesses and industries, he decides to usurp unconstitutional power and deliver “federal assistance” to meet his personal fancies, giving preferential treatment to his selected “promise zones” while ignoring our federal constitution’s legislative intent, e.g., No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another: nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear or pay Duties in another. Is it not clear by these words that our founders intentionally sought to prohibit federal power being used to favor one state over another or one community over another? And just what did one of our nation’s founders say which specifically addresses Obama’s “promise zones”?


"The framers of the Constitution guarded so much against a possibility of such partial preferences as might be given, if Congress had the right to grant them, that, even to encourage learning and useful arts, the granting of patents is the extent of their power. And surely nothing could be less dangerous to the sovereignty or interest of the individual States than the encouragement which might be given to ingenious inventors or promoters of valuable inventions in the arts and sciences. The encouragement which the General Government might give to the fine arts, to commerce, to manufactures, and agriculture, might, if judiciously applied, redound to the honor of Congress, and the splendor, magnificence, and real advantage of the United States; but the wise framers of our Constitution saw that, if Congress had the power of exerting what has been called a royal munificence for these purposes, Congress might, like many royal benefactors, misplace their munificence; might elevate sycophants, and be inattentive to men unfriendly to the views of Government; might reward the ingenuity of the citizens of one State, and neglect a much greater genius of another. A citizen of a powerful State it might be said, was attended to, whilst that of one of less weight in the Federal scale was totally neglected. It is not sufficient, to remove these objections, to say, as some gentlemen have said, that Congress in incapable of partiality or absurdities, and that they are as far from committing them as my colleagues or myself. I tell them the Constitution was formed on a supposition of human frailty, and to restrain abuses of mistaken powers.” Annals of Congress Feb 7th,1792 Representative Page


The best thing which could happen to rekindle America’s once thriving economic base would be to end all taxes calculated from profits, gains, salaries and other incomes; move to taxing consumption to fill our national treasury as intended by our founders; end minimum wage law, and end regulations which have chased so many of America’s factories, manufactures and industries to foreign countries. How would this help? Investors would quickly take advantage of this new tax policy and start up new businesses. It would also immediately help millions of young adults who have dropped out of school who are now unemployed, because businesses in the trades, manufactures and industries could hire them as “trainees” starting them at a very low wage and increase wages as each becomes productive.

And of course, tens of thousands of jobs would immediately become available if our socialist in the White House would get out of the way so the Keystone pipeline could be built.

But instead of following sound policies giving a rebirth to America’s economic might, our usurper in the White House wants to redistribute revenue from our federal treasury and give preferential treatment to his chosen few who just happen to be part of his inner circle. Have we forgotten his green energy money laundering operation in which he plundered our national treasury of $ BILLIONS and 80% of Obama green jobs money went to Obama donors.?

Let us take a look at the list who have profited off working people‘s earned wages being transferred to them by Obama:


• Beacon Power Corp: Received $43 million in federal loan guaranteed in 2009 and also received $29 million in PA grants – Bankrupt in October 2011

• Ener1 (parent company of EnerDel): Received $118.5 million in federal loan guarantees — Bankrupt in January 2012 – has since exited bankruptcy

• Evergreen Solar: Received $58 million in MA loan guarantees (an undisclosed portion sourced from federal ARRA block grant) — Bankrupt in August 2011 with $485.6 million in debt

• Solyndra: Received $535 million in federal loan guarantees in 2009 and $25.1 million in CA tax credit — Bankrupt in August 2011

• SpectraWatt: Received $500,000 in federal loan guarantees in 2009 — Bankrupt in August 2011

• Babcock and Brown: Received $178 million in federal grants in December 2009 (4 months after it went bust) – Bankrupt in early 2009

• Mountain Plaza Inc.: Received $424,000 in federal grants through TN Department of Transportation in 2009 — Bankrupt in 2003 and again in June 2010

• Solar Trust of America (parent company: Solar Millennium): Received $2.1 billion loan guarantee in April 2011 – Bankrupt in April 2012
Other Subsidized Green Energy Companies in decline:

• A123: Received $300 million in federal grants and $135 million in MI grants — Declining orders and have forced multiple layoffs

• Amonix, Inc.: Received $5.9 million in federal tax credits in 2009 through ARRA — Laid off 2/3 of work force

• First Solar: Received $3 billion in federal loan guarantees — Biggest S&P loser in 2011, CEO fired

• Fisker Automotive: $529 million in federal loan guarantees — Multiple 2012 sales prediction downgrades for first car release, delivery and cash flow troubles; Assembling cars in Finland

• Johnson Controls: Received $299 million in federal grants in 2009 — Low demand caused cancellation of a new factory, operating at half capacity

• Nevada Geothermal: Received $98.5 million in federal loan guarantees in 2009 — Defaulting on long-term debt obligations, 85% drop in stock value

• Sun Power: Received $1.2 billion in federal loan guarantees — Debt exceeds assets; French oil company took over last fall

• Abound Solar: Received $400 million in federal loans in 2012 — ½ work force laid off

• BrightSource Energy: $1.6 billion federal loan approved in April 2012 – loan obtained through political connections with the administration; absent the loan, Brightsource’s solar power purchase would have fallen through.

see:Green Energy’s Bankruptcy Blackout


The bottom line is, if there is money involved you can bet Obama's plan is another money laundering operation designed to fatten the fortunes of his inner circle pals.


JWK



"To lay with one hand the power of the government on the property of the citizen [a working person’s earned wage] and with the other to bestow upon favored individuals, to aid private enterprises and build up private fortunes [Obama’s Solyndra, Chevy Volt, Fisker, Exelon swindling deals] is none the less a robbery because it is done under forms of law and called taxation."____ Savings and Loan Assc. v. Topeka,(1875).
 
It's a flat violation of the Constitution's Welfare Clause. That says the Fed govt can collect taxes to spend on Defense and "General Welfare", which in George Washington's day meant programs that benefit all Americans equally. The Constitution carefully refused any authority to spend tax money on "local welfare", which meant programs that helped isolated or small groups - what we would call "Special Interests" today.

Needless to say, it's one of the most-violated parts of the entire Constitution.
 
It's a flat violation of the Constitution's Welfare Clause. That says the Fed govt can collect taxes to spend on Defense and "General Welfare", which in George Washington's day meant programs that benefit all Americans equally. The Constitution carefully refused any authority to spend tax money on "local welfare", which meant programs that helped isolated or small groups - what we would call "Special Interests" today.

Needless to say, it's one of the most-violated parts of the entire Constitution.

It also violates the 14th Amendment.
 
These things called 'promise zones'; are they like districts in Hunger Games?

It's similar to this and is getting some good words from McConnel and Paul:
“I believe in empowerment zones. Most of the unemployed black Americans in this country are in these mostly economically depressed areas. It could be, and I’m only using this as an example, because we haven’t finished establishing the parameters yet. Instead of in a designated empowerment zone, it being 9-9-9, it could be, as an example only, 3-3-3.

What this does, because you have a lot of African-Americans located in cities like Detroit, disproportionately, it would encourage businesses to stay in business there or to move there. It would encourage people to work there, because if you live in the empowerment zone, you’re going to pay a smaller percentage in taxes.”
 
It's a hoax. There will be no promise zones. For decades we had the same thing called enterprise zones. Same thing. It was still impossible to open a business in an enterprise zone. The regulations don't go away. Especially state regulations. Then there are local permits and fees. If the regulations don't strangle you and the fees don't crush you then your business will open to a succession of robberies until you finally have to close.

Most people looking to open some kind of business know this. They do their homework. Unless opening a business is part of a larger scam, nothing will open. It just sounds good. But it is just another obamahoax.
 
These things called 'promise zones'; are they like districts in Hunger Games?

Yes, pretty much the same thing. Give to some by taking from others.

Here's what I don't get but there must be a reason, why these five? What is so special about these five locations they deserve this special designation over the rest of the country? I'm guessing it may have something to due with electoral maps.

San Antonio, Unemployment there is already low compared to the national average. Texas overall has a good business environment so any company wanting to go to Texas San Antonio would already be on the list but why give them an advantage over Dallas or anyone else in an already decent state to do business in?

Philadelphia, Well there's a shithole but are federal regulations really holding Philly back? Isn't it Philly doing that? Maybe Philly should do something about their own problems and that would solve the problems.

Los Angeles, Another left wing shithole. Federal taxes and regulations aren't the reson business is leaving that metropolis of suck. It's the state and city that are causing that.

Southeastern Kentucky, Umm, fuckin' what? If you're going to screw over the Kentucky, Virginia coal industry why give breaks to only Kentucky? How about we just let coal mining work.

Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, another WTF location. Oklahoma City right next door but no, no breaks for going there you have to help out the Indian tribe. Like the Indians don't have cars to go into OKC for jobs and if that was a reliable place for a business to get labor they would move there anyway.

A real president, one with an agenda for the entire nation would be calling for tax relief for every square inch of the nation in order to get an economy moving. Not this turd though. You have to get the special blessing of a community organizing piece of shit for that.
 
These things called 'promise zones'; are they like districts in Hunger Games?

Wow! Lowering Taxes to promote Commerce! What a concept! But, but, it seems so radical.... so extreme.... next thing you know, they will be creating jobs, building infrastructure..... turning Republican!!! :eek: Oh No!!!! We can't have that!!! :):lol::lol:
Translation.......
Pretty hypocritical, huh?
 
These things called 'promise zones'; are they like districts in Hunger Games?

Wow! Lowering Taxes to promote Commerce! What a concept! But, but, it seems so radical.... so extreme.... next thing you know, they will be creating jobs, building infrastructure..... turning Republican!!! :eek: Oh No!!!! We can't have that!!! :):lol::lol:
Translation.......
Pretty hypocritical, huh?

Not sure what side of the hypocritical you're on. But if your saying this is good for these five lucky lotto winners of the presidential lottery it should be good for everyone equally I concur.
 
.

Obama’s “promise zones” is not only a promise to pay off his supporters and donors, it is right out of the communist playbook and another robbery and redistribution of hard working people’s paychecks.

JWK


"To lay with one hand the power of the government on the property of the citizen [a working person’s earned wage] and with the other to bestow upon favored individuals, to aid private enterprises and build up private fortunes [Obama’s Solyndra, Chevy Volt, Fisker, Exelon swindling deals] is none the less a robbery because it is done under forms of law and called taxation."____ Savings and Loan Assc. v. Topeka,(1875).
 
Reminds me of a flashback episode of "Married..With Children, in which a librarian admonishes the young Al Bundy: "Make a promise, keep a promise!" to which Al replies: "Yeah, yeah' make pie, eat a pie".

In Obama's case, it's a pie that never gets bigger, from which the rich take bigger and bigger slices at the expense of others, a typical liberal pie-in-the-sky.
 
man you guys should just as stupid when you all stand arround and talk to each other as you do on your own
 
I thought that the liberals told us that our insistence that lowering taxes increases commerce and creates jobs was complete bull shit?

But it only works when Obama does it?

Liberal hypocrisy knows no boundaries.


Great post! And it would work for Obama because it would provide him with another opportunity to pay off his supporters and donors, and redistribute hard working people’s paychecks into their pockets.

This prick in the White House can pervert anything, and especially good ideas.


JWK



"To lay with one hand the power of the government on the property of the citizen [a working person’s earned wage] and with the other to bestow upon favored individuals, to aid private enterprises and build up private fortunes [Obama’s Solyndra, Chevy Volt, Fisker, Exelon swindling deals] is none the less a robbery because it is done under forms of law and called taxation."____ Savings and Loan Assc. v. Topeka,(1875).
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top