Obama can't be prosecuted. You can thank Trump for that.

[Mac1958]

Show me. Don't tell me.

In a fairly rare moment of clarity, they now have to either indict and prosecute or look like ******* lying idiots.

The word "treason" has been used at the very top level of our government. So they'd better have the proof. And if they don't, their targets had better clamp on to them like a hungry rottweiler with a bone.

 

[Skylar]

Again....moral-relativism isn't a defense.

You know that neither word salad nor caplock magically transforms accusations backed by jackshit into actual evidence?

You have nothing on Obama. Just accusations.

This is all theater for MAGA mouth-breathers.....to desperately try and convince them not to ask questions about the Trump administrations suppression of evidence of child rape and sex trafficking.....all to protect Trump.

 

[Skylar]

In a fairly rare moment of clarity, they now have to either indict or look like ******* lying idiots.

The word "treason" has been used at the very top level of our government. So they'd better have the proof. And if they don't, their targets had better clamp on to them like a hungry rottweiler with a bone.

Nah. You're underestimating the the complete lack of cognitive gag reflex these MAGA throats are afflicted with. Thier only role is to suck and swallow. That's it.

They'll happily conflate accusations with actual evidence if it means that they can gobble another thick orange load of whatever Trump pumps down their collective gullets.

Even if they have no evidence. Even if they have to ignore the Trump administrations suppression of evidence of rape of children and child sex trafficking to protect Trump.

These are not thinkers. They are Throats.

 

[Skylar]

Don't ask for evidence if you're not even going to look at it. We're done.

.

Accusations aren't evidence. If Gabbard had the irrefutable evidence that Trump claims she does of sedition, coups and treason, she would have presented it. If Gabbard had the evidence that Obama ordered the intelligence community to push a false narrative, she would have presented it.

Instead, she presented a monotonous series of accusations backed by no actual evidence.

You've watched her press conference. You already know this. You just hope we don't.

Run along, OK. This is about the extent of your capacity to contribute.

 

[Mac1958]

Nah. You're underestimating the the complete lack of cognitive gag reflex these MAGA throats are afflicted with. Thier only role is to suck and swallow. That's it.

They'll happily conflate accusations with actual evidence if it means that they can gobble another thick orange load of whatever Trump pumps down their collective gullets.

Even if they have no evidence. Even if they have to ignore the Trump administrations suppression of evidence of rape of children and child sex trafficking to protect Trump.

These are not thinkers. They are Throats.

One of my myriad flaws is that I tend to overestimate people. I keep doing that with Trump and his obedient flock.

 

[Skylar]

In a fairly rare moment of clarity, they now have to either indict and prosecute or look like ******* lying idiots.

The word "treason" has been used at the very top level of our government. So they'd better have the proof. And if they don't, their targets had better clamp on to them like a hungry rottweiler with a bone.

Not only DON'T they have the proof. They are so hopelessly brainwashed and indoctrinated, they insisted the don't HAVE to have proof.

To MAGA, accusations are literal evidence. If they can say a thing, the universe must magically aligns to make it so.

Alas, reality is far less compliant with their attempts at collective manifestation of right wing fever dreams.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

How dare the incoming administration try to establish communications with other world leaders?

140 times to one leader, Putin.

What part of the smooth transition of power don't you understand?

US presidents call allies, not enemies.

Does part of the transition process include making false-accusations about the incoming president in an overt attempt to hamper his new administration sound reasonable to you?

No, it doesn't.

Trump falsely claims he won election as millions of votes ...​

CBS News
https://www.cbsnews.com › Politics
Nov 4, 2020 — President Trump made erroneous and baseless statements in his election night speech.

President Trump addressed the nation from the White House after 2 a.m. while the outcome of the election remained unclear, claiming victories in states that have not yet been decided and portraying the orderly counting of millions of legally cast votes as an illegitimate effort to steal the election.

The president pointed to his projected wins in Florida and Texas — although he falsely said nobody had projected those states — and claimed he'd won Georgia even as ballots are still being counted in some of that state's largest counties. The president also claimed victory in North Carolina, which CBS News estimates is a toss-up.

"They can't catch us," the president falsely claimed about Democrats.

Trump rebuked for call to suspend Constitution over election​

AP News
https://apnews.com › article › social-media-donald-trum...
Dec 4, 2022 — Former President Donald Trump is facing rebuke from both parties after calling for the “termination” of parts of the Constitution over his lie that the 2020 election was stolen.

 

[mudwhistle]

140 times to one leader, Putin.

US presidents call allies, not enemies.

No, it doesn't.

Trump falsely claims he won election as millions of votes ...​

View attachment 1140306
CBS News
https://www.cbsnews.com › Politics
Nov 4, 2020 — President Trump made erroneous and baseless statements in his election night speech.

President Trump addressed the nation from the White House after 2 a.m. while the outcome of the election remained unclear, claiming victories in states that have not yet been decided and portraying the orderly counting of millions of legally cast votes as an illegitimate effort to steal the election.

The president pointed to his projected wins in Florida and Texas — although he falsely said nobody had projected those states — and claimed he'd won Georgia even as ballots are still being counted in some of that state's largest counties. The president also claimed victory in North Carolina, which CBS News estimates is a toss-up.

"They can't catch us," the president falsely claimed about Democrats.

Trump rebuked for call to suspend Constitution over election​

View attachment 1140307
AP News
https://apnews.com › article › social-media-donald-trum...
Dec 4, 2022 — Former President Donald Trump is facing rebuke from both parties after calling for the “termination” of parts of the Constitution over his lie that the 2020 election was stolen.


View attachment 1140308

Uh....again, dipshit. They already admitted it was a hoax.
Let's fcking move on.

 

[mudwhistle]

In a fairly rare moment of clarity, they now have to either indict and prosecute or look like ******* lying idiots.

The word "treason" has been used at the very top level of our government. So they'd better have the proof. And if they don't, their targets had better clamp on to them like a hungry rottweiler with a bone.

Treason, sedition, espionage.

Take your ******* pick, shitforbrains.

 

[Mac1958]

Treason, sedition, espionage.

Take your ******* pick, shitforbrains.

Nasty personal stuff, as always. It's all you people know.

Indict. Then we'll see. You may not understand this, but that's how it works.

 

[Skylar]

Treason, sedition, and espionage isn't part of a POTUS's official acts.

Oh, and when a president is in office you have to impeach them and remove them first before you can arrest them and charge them with treason, sedition, and espionage.

But last I looked, Obama already left office years ago.

So they can charge him for the illegal acts he committed while POTUS.

What illegal acts? Remember, accusations alone may be more than adequate for MAGA press conferences. But courts need actual evidence.

And Obama doesn't have to be in office to have immunity. The entire case of Trump v. The United States about prosecution of Trump after his presidency for actions taken as President. The court found that he had immunity from the prosecution after his presidency.

Debunking the entire premise of your argument.

As is so common for you, you simply don't know what you're talking about nor have a sufficient basis of knowledge of the relevant cases to meaningfully contribute to the conversation. Maybe more caplock?

 

[mudwhistle]

Nasty personal stuff, as always. It's all you people know.

Indict. Then we'll see. You may not understand this, but that's how it works.

STFU. I'm fed up with you degenerate ***** with your hoaxes and your false claims.

How many GD times do we have to prove you cocksuckers are a bunch of scam artists trying to trick voters who refuse to pay attention into supporting your ridiculous nonsense?

 

[Skylar]

Treason, sedition, espionage.

Take your ******* pick, shitforbrains.

No evidence for treason. No evidence for sedition. No evidence of espionage. Nor evidence of any crime. With every meeting 'cited' by Gabbard being part of Obama's official duties as president.

What you have are accusations backed by jackshit. Accusations alone may be the MAGA gold standard. But in actual court, you'll need more: actual evidence. And you don't have it. And plausible path around the presumption of immunity granted by the courts for all that are are plausibly part of his official duties as President.

This is just more theater for dipshits, to distract from Trump and Epstein.

 

[mudwhistle]

What illegal acts? Remember, accusations alone may be more than adequate for MAGA press conferences. But courts need actual evidence.

And Obama doesn't have to be in office to have immunity. The entire case of Trump v. The United States about prosecution of Trump after his presidency for actions taken as President. The court found that he had immunity from the prosecution after his presidency.

Debunking the entire premise of your argument.

As is so common for you, you simply don't know what you're talking about nor have a sufficient basis of knowledge of the relevant cases to meaningfully contribute to the conversation. Maybe more caplock?

You can't debunk jack squat.

And the entire case of Trump v. The United States was over lawful acts, not sedition, fraud, or espionage.

You Democrats wanted to make everything Trump had the authority to do while in office out to be crimes.

That's why you fcking lost, you moron.

 

[Mac1958]

No evidence for treason. No evidence for sedition. No evidence of espionage. With every meeting 'cited' by Gabbard being part of Obama's official duties as president.

What you have are accusations backed by jackshit. Accusations alone may be the MAGA gold standard. But in actual court, you'll need more: actual evidence. And you don't have it. And plausible path around the presumption of immunity granted by the courts for all that are are plausibly part of his official duties as President.

This is just more theater for dipshits, to distract from Trump and Epstein.

He's very emotional.

 

[eagle1462010]

Obama was CORRUPT AS ****

NSA Director Rogers Disclosed FISA Abuse Days After Page Warrant...

 

[mudwhistle]

He's very emotional.

Anyone with any sense of right & wrong would be, you insufferable prick.

 

[Skylar]

STFU. I'm fed up with you degenerate ***** with your hoaxes and your false claims.

How many GD times do we have to prove you cocksuckers are a bunch of scam artists trying to trick voters who refuse to pay attention into supporting your ridiculous nonsense?

Trump himself called Gabbard's claims against Obama a witchhunt.

This is going nowhere. And it won't distract from the Trump admins attempt to cover up Trump's association with Epstein.

 

[Skylar]

Obama was CORRUPT AS ****

NSA Director Rogers Disclosed FISA Abuse Days After Page Warrant...

Is there evidence that Obama ordered any of these warrants?

 

[eagle1462010]

Important Reading: Mike Rogers and Obama-Era FISA Abuse - The Stream