Obama can't be prosecuted. You can thank Trump for that.

[mudwhistle]

Actually I said, many times, that he was too old to be President. Fading. Feeble.

Can't you grow up a little bit? Is this really the best you can do?

Grow up?

Why don't you wise the **** up.

 

[mudwhistle]

Clearly, Trump called the accusations against Obama a witch hunt.

"The witch hunt that you should be talking is that they caught President Obama, absolutely cold, Tulsi Gabbard. "

And despite you having the entire quote, we both know you'll play the 'taken out of context' game. So here's the entire quote again, for you to ignore again.

“I don’t really follow that too much. It’s sort of a witch hunt. A continuation of the witch hunt. The witch hunt that you should be talking is that they caught President Obama, absolutely cold, Tulsi Gabbard. What they did to this country in 2016, starting in 2016, but going all the way up to 2020 in the election, they tried to rig the election and they got caught and there should be very severe consequences for that."

Even Trump calls Gabbard's accusations against Obama a witch hunt.

All this effort to try and distract from the Trump administration's efforts to suppress evidence of Trump's association with Epstein.

Where's your link?

Clearly he's talking about the witchhunt against himself.

The media is clearly trying to spread yet another hoax.

 

[Skylar]

Grow up?

Why don't you wise the **** up.

Trump hallucinated entire conversations with his uncle that never occurred, nor could have occurred. There is clearly cognitive decline with oldest person to ever take the office of the presidency in US history.

Which may explain this absurd attempt to distract from his association with Epstein.

It has not gone well.

 

[mudwhistle]

Trump hallucinated entire conversations with his uncle that never occurred, nor could have occurred. There is clearly cognitive decline with oldest person to ever take the office of the presidency in US history.

Which may explain this absurd attempt to distract from his association with Epstein.

It has not gone well.

Again.....you're attempting moral-relativism.

Stop it.

 

[Mac1958]

And entirely too fragile to be president. I mean, he's so easily damaged that someone editing a video at CBS caused him 16 million dollars worth of emotional trauma.

That's beyond snowflake. If someone editing a video causes you that much crippling emotional damage, you probably shouldn't leave the house.

40+ years of non-stop manipulation, beginning the day Limbaugh went national.

Then 24/7/365 conditioning via the internet.

This is the result.

 

[Skylar]

Where's your link?

Does it matter? You're emotionally commited to ignoring it away? You're indoctrinated. I can't use evidence to convince a person that doesn't believe he has to have evidence.

For those who have use for evidence, here ya go! I'll even use a newsmax video, so we can skip past all the conspiracy fantasies about faked videos. The relevant quote is around 10:24 or so.




Ignore it just like you ignored Trump's own words. Just like you ignore the Trump admins suppression of evidence linking Trump and Epstein.

Clearly he's talking about the witchhunt against himself.

That's what you say, pretending you're Trump. This is Trump said himself:

"The witch hunt that you should be talking is that they caught President Obama, absolutely cold, Tulsi Gabbard. "

This is not ambiguous language. Its plain, simple and clear. Trump called the claims Gabbard made against Obama a witch hunt.

Quite the Freudian slip, wouldn't you say?

The media is clearly trying to spread yet another hoax.

By quoting what Trump actually said?

 

[Skylar]

Again.....you're attempting moral-relativism.

Stop it.

Laughing...you blinked again. More word salad doesn't make evidence of any crime committed by Obama just magically appear.

You've got nothing on Obama. Not so much as a parking ticket. Let alone your fantasies about 'treason', 'sedition', 'coups', 'espionage', or any of the other pseudo-legal gibberish tumbling out of MAGA's fetid little holes.

You're gonna need a much better distraction from the Trump administration's attempt to suppress evidence of Trump's association with Epstein.

 

[mudwhistle]

Does it matter? You're emotionally commited to ignoring it away? You're indoctrinated. I can't use evidence to convince a person that doesn't believe he has to have evidence.

For those who have use for evidence, here ya go! I'll even use a newsmax video, so we can skip past all the conspiracy fantasies about faked videos. The relevant quote is around 10:24 or so.




Ignore it just like you ignored Trump's own words. Just like you ignore the Trump admins suppression of evidence linking Trump and Epstein.


That's what you say, pretending you're Trump. This is Trump said himself:

"The witch hunt that you should be talking is that they caught President Obama, absolutely cold, Tulsi Gabbard. "

This is not ambiguous language. Its plain, simple and clear. Trump called the claims Gabbard made against Obama a witch hunt.

Quite the Freudian slip, wouldn't you say?


By quoting what Trump actually said?

RLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!. THIS IS YOUR PROOF???? You're INTENTIONALLY misquoting him.

They asked him about the Epstein case....not about Obama.
He said the Esptein list was part of a witchhunt. What he said instead was the fact that Obama issued directives to start a fake witchhunt against him.

 

[Godboy]

This thread doesn't discuss how horrible you might think Obama is, or if he is guilty of treason. None of those thing matter. The SC granted trump, and all presidents immunity from prosecution for anything that can remotely be tied to his powers as president. Can you think of a legal reason why trump was able to walk, but Obama should be charged?
If so, now is the time to educate us all. I look forward to your reasoned legal opinion.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

But he can lose his entire legacy. Hunter got a pardon and avoided jail time too, but how is his legacy and reputation doing these days?

 

[Hollie]

This thread doesn't discuss how horrible you might think Obama is, or if he is guilty of treason. None of those thing matter. The SC granted trump, and all presidents immunity from prosecution for anything that can remotely be tied to his powers as president. Can you think of a legal reason why trump was able to walk, but Obama should be charged?
If so, now is the time to educate us all. I look forward to your reasoned legal opinion.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

In your desperation to defend the Magic Kenyan, you’re hoping to revise the USSC ruling.

 

[Skylar]

RLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!. THIS IS YOUR PROOF???? You're INTENTIONALLY misquoting him.

They asked him about the Epstein case....not about Obama.
He said the Esptein list was part of a witchhunt. What he said instead was the fact that Obama issued directives to start a fake witchhunt against him.

Obvious nonsense. Every single word is accurate. Anyone can watch the video. And here's Reuters confirming the the accuracy of the very passage I bolded:

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-accuses-obama-treason-escalating-attacks-over-2016-russia-probe-2025-07-23/

Remember, your aggressive ignorance makes you a poor liar. As you simply don't know what you're talking about.

They asked Trump specifically about his former personal lawyers interviewing Maxwell. And Trump desperately tried to move away from the question by talking about Gabbard's witch hunt of catching Obama.

With witch hunt being the words that Trump himself used to describe it.

“I don’t really follow that too much. It’s sort of a witch hunt. A continuation of the witch hunt. The witch hunt that you should be talking is that they caught President Obama, absolutely cold, Tulsi Gabbard. What they did to this country in 2016, starting in 2016, but going all the way up to 2020 in the election, they tried to rig the election and they got caught and there should be very severe consequences for that."

Plain, simple language. And quite the Freudian slip. This is going nowhere.

 

[mudwhistle]

Obvious nonsense. Every single word is accurate. Anyone can watch the video. And here's Reuters confirming the the accuracy of the very passage I bolded:

View attachment 1140320

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-accuses-obama-treason-escalating-attacks-over-2016-russia-probe-2025-07-23/

Remember, your aggressive ignorance makes you a poor liar. As you simply don't know what you're talking about.

They asked Trump specifically about his former personal lawyers interviewing Maxwell. And Trump desperately tried to move away from the question by talking about Gabbard's witch hunt of catching Obama.

With witch hunt being the words that Trump himself used to describe it.

“I don’t really follow that too much. It’s sort of a witch hunt. A continuation of the witch hunt. The witch hunt that you should be talking is that they caught President Obama, absolutely cold, Tulsi Gabbard. What they did to this country in 2016, starting in 2016, but going all the way up to 2020 in the election, they tried to rig the election and they got caught and there should be very severe consequences for that."

Plain, simple language. And quite the Freudian slip. This is going nowhere.

Your quote in bold letters is fake.

Nice try tho.

 

[Skylar]

But he can lose his entire legacy. Hunter got a pardon and avoided jail time too, but how is his legacy and reputation doing these days?

Among who? Remember, Gabbard presented jack shit for evidence backing her accusations. If she had the irrefutable proof of treason, sedition, a coup, or election rigging that Trump insisted she did......Gabbard would have presented it.

Instead, she presented her accusations, backed by nothing.

Laughing.....maybe Gabbard's evidence is on Bondi's desk, next to the Epstein files?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

This thread doesn't discuss how horrible you might think Obama is, or if he is guilty of treason. None of those thing matter. The SC granted trump, and all presidents immunity from prosecution for anything that can remotely be tied to his powers as president. Can you think of a legal reason why trump was able to walk, but Obama should be charged?
If so, now is the time to educate us all. I look forward to your reasoned legal opinion.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

So Nixon shouldn't have resigned?

 

[Skylar]

Your quote in bold letters is fake.

Nice try tho.

Nope. Its confirmed in the video, for anyone to watch. And its confirmed by Reuters, word for word, for anyone to see.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-accuses-obama-treason-escalating-attacks-over-2016-russia-probe-2025-07-23/

You're really not doing your case any good here. As every time you deny what anyone can verify, you demonstrate you're simply too indoctrinated to be taken seriously.

Trump himself described Gabbard catching Obama as a witch hunt. Which was quite the Freudian slip.

Every time you ignore it, I win.

You're gonna need a better distraction than this pseudo-legal gibberish for people to stop talking about Trump and Epstein.

 

[Godboy]

Among who? Remember, Gabbard presented jack shit for evidence backing her accusations. If she had the irrefutable proof of treason, sedition, a coup, or election rigging that Trump insisted she did......Gabbard would have presented it.

Instead, she presented her accusations, backed by nothing.

Laughing.....maybe Gabbard's evidence is on Bondi's desk, next to the Epstein files?

The hit to his legacy is happening literally right now. Obama HATES that this scandal is front and center in the news.

Imagine how pathetic and unpatriotic you have to be to intentionally sabotage the incoming presidency, just out of spite. This is a BAD ******* look and Obama knows it.

 

[Skylar]

The hit to his legacy is happening literally right now. Obama HATES that this scandal is front and center in the news.

Imagine how pathetic and unpatriotic you have to be to intentionally sabotage the incoming presidency, just out of spite. This is a BAD ******* look and Obama knows it.

Among who? The MAGA faithful that would accept an accusation as evidence already hate Obama. And for everyone else, the Trump administration making shit up backed by nothing means no more than Trump's fake photo of an MS-13 tattoo on Garcia's knuckles. Or his desperate excuses about the Epstein files.

This is theater for dipshits. Its an awkward, failed attempt to distract from the Trump administration's suppression of evidence linking Trump and Epstein.

 

[Godboy]

Among who? The MAGA faithful that would accept an accusation as evidence already hate Obama. And for everyone else, the Trump administration making shit up backed by nothing means no more than Trump's fake photo of an MS-13 tattoo on Garcia's knuckles. Or his desperate excuses about the Epstein files.

This is theater for dipshits. Its an awkward, failed attempt to distract from the Trump administration's suppression of evidence linking Trump and Epstein.

American democrats are a tiny fraction of our worlds population. The entire world now knows that Obama did this. His legacy is screwed. YOU defending him wont change that. YOU still liking him doesnt mean that his legacy isnt completely fucked. Young democrats will not respect him, only you older saps will.

 

[Skylar]

American democrats are a tiny fraction of our worlds population. The entire world now knows that Obama did this. His legacy is screwed. YOU defending him wont change that. YOU still liking him doesnt mean that his legacy isnt completely fucked.

The world? Obama's popular around the world. Trump is wildly unpopular anywhere outside Russia or Israel. Trump is a known liar around the world. We're routinely mocked across the planet for the foolishness of electing him. Trust and sentiment in the US has plummeted so hard under Trump that China is now more trusted and respected than the US among most of our own allies.

So who exactly is supposed to believe accusations against Obama backed by nothing? Only the MAGA faithful. Only the people that already hate Obama.

For everyone else, they already know that Trump lies constantly. And accusations from Trump backed by nothing means no more than Trump's fake photo of an MS-13 tattoo on Garcia's knuckles. Or Trump's desperate excuses about the Epstein files.

So......is that it? Even in your imagined scenario, Obama comes out beautifully. While Trump's legacy, internationally and domestically, is a horror show.

 

[1srelluc]

He can, like Nixon, be named as an unindicted co-conspirator. All the impact without the drama.