Obama can't be prosecuted. You can thank Trump for that.

[Nostra]

There was no "proven" collusion.

But there was "Russia if you're listening....."

Right. No collusion.

$40 million pissed away on a goose chase created by Barry Hussein.

 

[BlindBoo]

Give it up, you look as stupid as that Skylar moron.

There was no collusion.

Man, you clowns will beat a dead horse for years.

Mueller couldn't gather enough evidence from Russia to prove a conspiracy existed was the conclusion of his report. You will not find the quote you published in the report.

,

 

[postman]

So?

The Russian interference was the fake Russian dossier Hitlery paid for, Simp.

Investigating foreign election interference is a national security matter. And squarely within the powers and duties of the president.

 

[hadit]

Afraid it was
It was exceptionally broad to the extent of a President is above the law (which the court chose to not exclude)

Don't need to prosecute. Just put out all the evidence and let the people decide how much legacy to leave intact.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

You're clearly not following the actual conversation. Redfish insisted that the Mueller report proved there was no Russian influence.

That was an obvious lie that was refuted with comic ease.

And aren't y'all the ones insisting that Obama committed sedition, treason, treasonous conspiracy, a coup and election rigging?

And yet, haven't managed any evidence at all?

Obama was involved in the illegal act of attempting to interfere with a candidates run for President. Nixon was forced to resign for covering up the same thing when people he didnt order to do it were caught.

 

[Rawley]

Sure it is. Anything related to presidential action is immune

Nope

 

[Skylar]

Give it up, you look as stupid as that Skylar moron.

There was no collusion.

Man, you clowns will beat a dead horse for years.

Strange, your made up quote didn't actually exist in the Mueller report. While BlindBoos did. Odd, that.

If you ever manage that evidence proving that Obama committed sedition, treason, treasonous conspiracy, a coup or election rigging, give me a holler.

Don't feel bad at your failure. All of you have failed perfectly at this cartoon simple task.

 

[Rawley]

John Durham already took a swing at that and struck out in embarrassing fashion. Much to the disappointment of nitwits who were salivating over revelations that never came.

Yes. He didn't find any of the documents that Gabbard has now found. I'd to know why.

 

[BlindBoo]

"the evidence was not sufficient to support criminal charges" and "no evidence of collusion" is not exactly the same thing.

The criminal charge Mueller was investigating was conspiracy, not collusion. People collude with each other all the time.

 

[Mac-7]

Obama was acting in his role as President in the best interests of the country

Aren’t you glad SCOTUS exempts him from prosecution?

this wont help obama’s legacy

We nay not be able to put him in jail, even it that were the goal, but will tarnish his reputation forever

If he indeed gets off the hook thanks a shielding loophole, congress can pass a Save America From Traitors Like Obama bill and close the escape rout for future presidents

 

[Skylar]

Obama was involved in the illegal act of attempting to interfere with a candidates run for President. Nixon was forced to resign for covering up the same thing when people he didnt order to do it were caught.

How, specifically? Show me the evidence of his illegal act.

I've heard all sorts of accusations from all sorts of folks in this thread. But none of you have managed to actually present the evidence that Obama committed any crime. Not so much as a parking ticket.

Let alone sedition, a coup, treason, or election rigging.

 

[Frankenstein]

Sure it is. Anything related to presidential action is immune

Official acts not espionage and criminally changing intelligence info

 

[LeftofLeft]

Obama never demanded the Peace Prize. And when it was awarded to him anyway, he said that his receiving the award was controversial because he was only at the beginning of his work on the world stage, and compared to others his accomplishments were slight.

That doesn't sound arrogant. That doesn't sound narcissistic. That sounds quite self aware and humble.

Obama did nothing to earn the Peace Prize. It is a token from the global Left. They gave it to him upon election in 2009 and he proceeded to bomb nations throughout his tenure which tells you what a bullshit award it has become. Trump is saying he should get it based on their so-called standards; but he’s not acting entitled to it.

 

[Frankenstein]

Laughing.....you can't touch Obama. You know it. I know it. Bondi knows it.

This is just more meaningless theater for dipshits, like Trump showing pictures of imaginary MS-13 tattoos on knuckles.

All so that that your ilk can try and cover up Trump's association with known pedophile and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

So genius If Trump was so associated wouldn't the Biden admin. released the files therefore saving democracy. You don't know your ass from a hole in the ground, there are most likely intelligence reasons for not releasing the files. Democrats know that and are putting forth a false narrative.

 

[Mac-7]

How, specifically? Show me the evidence of his illegal act.

I've heard all sorts of accusations from all sorts of folks in this thread. But none of you have managed to actually present the evidence that Obama committed any crime. Not so much as a parking ticket.

Let alone sedition, a coup, treason, or election rigging.

Conspiracy is a crime

But he might get away with it even if some of his subordinates do not

 

[jknowgood]

Obama investigated claims of Russian interference
As any President should.
Mueller investigation along with CIA and FBI showed Russian interference

Yet, no Russian collusion.

 

[Skylar]

Obama did nothing to earn the Peace Prize. It is a token from the global Left. They gave it to him upon election in 2009 and he proceeded to bomb nations throughout his tenure which tells you what a bullshit award it has become. Trump is saying he should get it based on their so-called standards; but he’s not acting entitled to it.

Nor did Obama ever claim he did. Quite the opposite:

"To be honest, I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many of the transformative figures who've been honored by this prize," Obama said in brief remarks at the White House. "I do not view it as a recognition of my own accomplishments but rather as an affirmation of American leadership on behalf of aspirations held by people in all nations."

He acknowledged that his receiving the prize was controversial because his acts on the world state were just beginning and compared to others who had fought longer and sacrificed more, his contributions were small.

How is that arrogant or narcissistic? That sounds both humble and self aware.

 

[the watcher]

You can thank your compromised congress and courts for no accountability. If the government were to announce that, yeah, we lied to you, and we're going to continue for your own good, what do you think you would do about it? I'll tell you, nothing. That's what you'd do.

 

[postman]

That was NOT a US sanction, that was something the G7 did in 2014.

Even Google AI says you're full of shit.

AI Overview
Yes, having a club membership suspended can be considered a sanction.
A sanction, in this context, refers to a penalty or form of punishment imposed for non-compliance with rules or regulations. When a club suspends a member's membership, it is typically in response to a violation of the club's rules, bylaws, or code of conduct.

The G8 club.

 

[Rambunctious]

This thread doesn't discuss how horrible you might think Obama is, or if he is guilty of treason. None of those thing matter. The SC granted trump, and all presidents immunity from prosecution for anything that can remotely be tied to his powers as president. Can you think of a legal reason why trump was able to walk, but Obama should be charged?
If so, now is the time to educate us all. I look forward to your reasoned legal opinion.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

Dems set the precedent... a former president can be prosecuted.... whoops...