Obama can't be prosecuted. You can thank Trump for that.

[BlindBoo]

"We found NO EVIDENCE of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign"-Mueller Report.

Sux to be you, loser.

More Fake Quotes.

"But collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law. For those reasons, the Office’s focus in analyzing questions of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined in federal law"

"First, the Office determined that Russia’s two principal interference operations in the 2016U.S. presidential election—the social media campaign and the hacking-and-dumping operations—violated U.S. criminal law. Many of the individuals and entities involved in the social media campaign have been charged with participating in a conspiracy to defraud the United States by undermining through deceptive acts the work of federal agencies charged with regulating foreign influence in U.S. elections, as well as related counts of identity theft."

"Second, while the investigation identified numerous links between individuals with ties to the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump Campaign, the evidence was not sufficient to support criminal charges."

https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/dl?inline=

 

[Skylar]

Just the opposite. Mueller showed there was Russian interference, that could have influenced the election.
They did not attempt to quantify the amount of interference.

Remember they indicted Russians for their acts of interfering in the election.

And I'm like 90% sure that Red has already seen the passages from the Mueller report that refute his imaginary claim.

I generally clock Redfish as one of the purest representations of the MAGA belief in accusational manifestation. Where by merely saying shit, the universe must magically realign to match.

 

[postman]

Its this enduring fantasy of MAGA. And as ethereal as a wish upon the northern star.

With 'irrefutable proof'.....until you actually ask to see it. Then its just excuses why have no such proof.

It seems to be a republican trait.
Remember all the irrefutable proof that Iraq had WMD's.

 

[Luckyone]

This thread doesn't discuss how horrible you might think Obama is, or if he is guilty of treason. None of those thing matter. The SC granted trump, and all presidents immunity from prosecution for anything that can remotely be tied to his powers as president. Can you think of a legal reason why trump was able to walk, but Obama should be charged?
If so, now is the time to educate us all. I look forward to your reasoned legal opinion.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

Trump can't be sentenced for the 35 felony counts he was found guilty of. You can thank the Trump supporters for that.

 

[Skylar]

More Fake Quotes.

"But collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law. For those reasons, the Office’s focus in analyzing questions of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined in federal law"

"First, the Office determined that Russia’s two principal interference operations in the 2016U.S. presidential election—the social media campaign and the hacking-and-dumping operations—violated U.S. criminal law. Many of the individuals and entities involved in the social media campaign have been charged with participating in a conspiracy to defraud the United States by undermining through deceptive acts the work of federal agencies charged with regulating foreign influence in U.S. elections, as well as related counts of identity theft."

"Second, while the investigation identified numerous links between individuals with ties to the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump Campaign, the evidence was not sufficient to support criminal charges."

https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/dl?inline=

"the evidence was not sufficient to support criminal charges" and "no evidence of collusion" is not exactly the same thing.

 

[Nostra]

That wasn't the claim I was refuting, was it? Redfish insisted "actually the millions spent on Mueller proved that there was no Russian influence".

Which is an obvious lie.

And have you managed to find any evidence that Obama committed any crime? Let alone sedition, treason, treasonous conspiracy, a coup, or election rigging?

I'm guessing the excuses why you can't are next.

Hey stupid, Mueller spent $40 MILLION and found NO COLLUSION.

You are a special kind of stupid.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I love how you progressives always make claims and then in small print make the statement "but not enough evidence to charge or call it a crime" all the while insisting it was a crime and that it was horrible.

 

[postman]

And I'm like 90% sure that Red has already seen the passages from the Mueller report that refute his imaginary claim.

I generally clock Redfish as one of the purest representations of the MAGA belief in accusational manifestation. Where by merely saying shit, the universe must magically realign to match.

Redfish also claimed it was democrats that started George H.W. Bush, and George W. Bush's wars in Iraq.

The man has no shame.

 

[postman]

Hey stupid, Mueller spent $40 MILLION and found NO COLLUSION.

You are a special kind of stupid.

But he found Russian interference in the election. A conclusion similarly shared by the senate committee headed by Marco Rubio.

 

[Skylar]

Hey stupid, Mueller spent $40 MILLION and found NO COLLUSION.

You are a special kind of stupid.

You said that the Mueller report found no evidence of collusion. That's not what it said. It said there insufficient evidence to justify criminal charges.

So even in moving the goal posts from the claim I was actually refuting.......you didn't know what you were talking about.

Give me a holler if you ever manage to scrabble together evidence that Obama committed any crime. I won't hold my breath.

 

[Nostra]

More Fake Quotes.

"But collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law. For those reasons, the Office’s focus in analyzing questions of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined in federal law"

"First, the Office determined that Russia’s two principal interference operations in the 2016U.S. presidential election—the social media campaign and the hacking-and-dumping operations—violated U.S. criminal law. Many of the individuals and entities involved in the social media campaign have been charged with participating in a conspiracy to defraud the United States by undermining through deceptive acts the work of federal agencies charged with regulating foreign influence in U.S. elections, as well as related counts of identity theft."

"Second, while the investigation identified numerous links between individuals with ties to the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump Campaign, the evidence was not sufficient to support criminal charges."

https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/dl?inline=

Give it up, you look as stupid as that Skylar moron.

There was no collusion.

Man, you clowns will beat a dead horse for years.

 

[Nostra]

You said that the Mueller report found there was no evidence of collusion. That's not what it said. It said there insufficient evidence to justify criminal charges.

So even in moving the goal posts from the claim I was actually refuting.......you didn't know what you were talking about.

Give me a holler if you ever manage to scrabble together evidence that Obama committed any crime. I won't hold my breath.

Still waiting on your 'evidence', Simp.

Mueller: No collusion.

 

[postman]

I love how you progressives always make claims and then in small print make the statement "but not enough evidence to charge or call it a crime" all the while insisting it was a crime and that it was horrible.

Is that like the way republicans label all aliens as "illegal aliens", even when they committed, or were charged with any crime?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

But he found Russian interference in the election. A conclusion similarly shared by the senate committee headed by Marco Rubio.

so what they interfere in every election. The claim made by you retards was that Trump was involved and that simply wasn't true.

 

[Nostra]

But he found Russian interference in the election.

So?

The Russian interference was the fake Russian dossier Hitlery paid for, Simp.

 

[postman]

Give it up, you look as stupid as that Skylar moron.

There was no collusion.

Man, you clowns will beat a dead horse for years.

There was no "proven" collusion.

But there was "Russia if you're listening....."

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Is that like the way republicans label all aliens as "illegal aliens", even when they committed, or were charged with any crime?

we label all illegal aliens those that entered the US illegally which IS a crime stupid ****.

 

[Skylar]

I love how you progressives always make claims and then in small print make the statement "but not enough evidence to charge or call it a crime" all the while insisting it was a crime and that it was horrible.

You're clearly not following the actual conversation. Redfish insisted that the Mueller report proved there was no Russian influence.

That was an obvious lie that was refuted with comic ease.

And aren't y'all the ones insisting that Obama committed sedition, treason, treasonous conspiracy, a coup and election rigging?

And yet, haven't managed any evidence at all?

 

[struth]

Kicking Russia out of the G8 is a sanction


sanc·tion
noun
1. a threatened penalty for disobeying a law or rule.

That was NOT a US sanction, that was something the G7 did in 2014. Since then, Trump, along with a number of other G7 countries have encouraged bringing them back in....so that everyone can communicate and hopefully end the "more flexible with Putin" war.

 

[postman]

so what they interfere in every election. The claim made by you retards was that Trump was involved and that simply wasn't true.

so what they interfere in every election.

You're like that congresswoman who told the crowd about medicaid cuts

Everybody dies