Obama can't be prosecuted. You can thank Trump for that.

[BlindBoo]

So you admit no collusion.

Baby steps.

So you admit you either don't know the difference between collusion and a criminal conspiracy or you're still deliberately conflating the two.

It's pretty obvious it's the latter.

 

[TemplarKormac]

No wars broke out.

Hmm, the Ukraine-Russia War broke out on Biden's watch.

 

[Nostra]

Really? Then it will be remarkably easy for you to show us where in that paper trail he incriminated himself in the commission of sedition, treason, election rigging, and a coup.

Gonna be a little difficult though, isn't it? As you don't have any such paper trail. Nor any evidence of any crime.

Still waiting on your evidence of collusion, liar.

tic....toc.....

 

[postman]

The grand jury files from florida are not the entirety of the Epstein files. And its the DOJ that is refusing to release the Epstein Files. Bondi already confirmed that she had them.

And now Trump's story on the Epstein files changes almost daily. And this after MAGA ran on the release of the files.

And then refused to, suppressing them instead.

Releasing the grand jury files on Maxwell was always just a RED-HERRING.
Most of the grand jury testimony was made by women who as children were recruited by Maxwell for Epstein's lascivious exploitation of them.

 

[Nostra]

So you admit you either don't know the difference between collusion and a criminal conspiracy or you're still deliberately conflating the two.

It's pretty obvious it's the latter.

Post your evidence of a criminal conspiracy, Simp.

Watch the troll run away........

 

[Skylar]

He had his admin help another candidate smear a candidate for President. He authorized intel on a running candidate for President based on false information and allowed them to pass it to Hillary and her team.

Show me, don't tell me. Show Obama ordering his admin to 'help another candidate smear a candidate for president'.

Remember, Obama didn't order the IAC be fully reviewed until December 6th, 2016. And the IAC didn't come back until January 5th. So, um.....how could that have impacted the election?

Was a blue police box or a delorean involved? Because the election was in November.

 

[postman]

Lies.

A President can be prosecuted.

You are an idiot.

Not for any "presidential", or with great deference presidential "related" acts.

 

[Rambunctious]

Really? Then it will be remarkably easy for you to show us where in that paper trail he incriminated himself in the commission of sedition, treason, election rigging, and a coup.

Gonna be a little difficult though, isn't it? As you don't have any such paper trail. Nor any evidence of any crime.

If you watched real news you would have seen the evidence Tulsi has... we did on FOX news... but the MSM will not cover this story...
Obama kept this going after he left office making this treason and it can't be explained away as his duty as president...

 

[Nostra]

Show me, don't tell me. Show Obama ordering his admin to 'help another candidate smear a candidate for president'.

Remember, Obama didn't order the IAC be fully reviewed until December 6th, 2016. And the IAC didn't come back until January 5th. So, um.....how could that have impacted the election?

Was a blue police box or a delorean involved? Because the election was in November.

Show us your collusion evidence.

Skylar

 

[Skylar]

You keep focusing on the prize. I never said he was arrogant or narcissistic about THE PRIZE. You keep hanging on to that. How about when he demanded Georgetown University take down The Crucifix in the Hall he was going to speak. That’s beyond narcissistic and arrogant. That is Diva territory.

That's what we're discussing, isn't it?

So we can agree that he was never arrogant or narcissistic about the prize.

Perfect!

 

[postman]

Hmm, the Ukraine-Russia War broke out on Biden's watch.

And WWII broke out under FDR's watch. But that has nothing to do with Herbert Hoover.

 

[Nostra]

Not for any "presidential", or with great deference presidential "related" acts.

Your story is changing.

 

[BlindBoo]

Really? Then it will be remarkably easy for you to show us where in that paper trail he incriminated himself in the commission of sedition, treason, election rigging, and a coup.

Gonna be a little difficult though, isn't it? As you don't have any such paper trail. Nor any evidence of any crime.

Damn incredible that Durham, a seasoned investigator, found no such evidence. Yet in a few short months "Gabbard and The Don" have already tried, convicted and all but sentenced Obama in the Court of Faux Not News opinion.

 

[postman]

Still waiting on your evidence of collusion, liar.

tic....toc.....

You actually have Roger Stone as a "link" between Trump and Russia.

 

[Skylar]

If you watched real news you would have seen the evidence Tulsi has... we did on FOX news... but the MSM will not cover this story...
Obama kept this going after he left office making this treason and it can't be explained away as his duty as president...

Is this where you start your typical shtick of giving me hapless excuses why you can't produce any of the evidence you allude to?

Show me the paper trail. I'm looking right at the 46 page doc that Gabbard released on the topic. Give me a page number and a quote. Obama is only mentioned 7 times in the entire doc.

Show me. Don't tell me. If Obama is guilty of all of these heinous crimes, it should be remarkably easy. If not..........well, you know how that works out for you.

 

[Skylar]

Damn incredible that Durham, a seasoned investigator, found no such evidence. Yet in a few short months "Gabbard and The Don" have already tried, convicted and all but sentenced Obama in the Court of Faux Not News opinion.

Its irrefutable proof......

.....until you ask to actually see it.

 

[Rawley]

I didn't say no collusion.

Remember "Russia if you're listening...."

That would be collusion if a positive link was established between the request and the response.

You can't say there was NO collusion.
And that's not the conclusion of the Mueller report.

1,000% Ratty. Kudos

Mueller “did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Its irrefutable proof......

.....until you ask to actually see it.

Like the claim by a democratic sitting member of Congress claiming he had irrefutably proof Trump was guilty when they impeached him.

 

[Rambunctious]

Is this where you start your typical shtick of giving me hapless excuses why you can't produce any of the evidence you allude to?

Show me the paper trail. I'm looking right at the 46 page doc that Gabbard released on the topic. Give me a page number and a quote. Obama is only mentioned 7 times in the entire doc.

Show me. Don't tell me. If Obama is guilty of all of these heinous crimes, it should be remarkably easy. If not..........well, you know how that works out for you.

DOJ forms Russiagate 'strike force' to investigate declassified Obama-era evidence

The Justice Department has formed a "strike force" to assess the evidence publicized by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard relating to former President Barack Obama and his top national security and intelligence officials' alleged involvement in the origins of the Trump–Russia...

www.foxnews.com

 

[postman]

Your story is changing.

If it changed, you would be able to post a before and after.

But I know you can't, because my story hasn't changed.