Obama can't be prosecuted. You can thank Trump for that.

Obama investigated claims of Russian interference
As any President should.
Mueller investigation along with CIA and FBI showed Russian interference
actually the millions spent on Mueller proved that there was no Russian influence. but he wasted taxpayer money on what anyone with common sense already knew.
 
Nostra....you don't read. You don't research. You insult people and give excuses why you don't read or research. That's your schtick.

As y'all are the ones making these rather melodramatic claims of sedition, treason, coups, treasonous conspiracy and election rigging......perhaps you could show me the evidence supporting these claims.

Not you, obviously. You have no idea what you're talking about. But someone on this thread?

I'm looking right at the documents that Gabbard released. All 46 pages of them, in pdf format. So if y'all make up nonsense, I'll know immediate.

Show me.
Post this evidence you have reviewed here Skylar
'

I say you can't because you are a lying sack of vermin shit. Prove me wrong.

GO!

Oh, and Gabbert released over 100 documents that were declassified, not 46, liar.

:oops8:

And it is hilarious you think that is the only evidence she sent to DOJ, Simp.
 
My evidence of what? I'm under no obligation to prove Obama innocent of whatever y'all make up.

If you believe that Obama has committed any crime, show me. Show me the crimes, show me the evidence of those crimes.

Again, obviously not you. You don't read or research. But someone in the thread other than myself surely does.
You claimed you read ALL the evidence.

Post it.
 
My evidence of what? I'm under no obligation to prove Obama innocent of whatever y'all make up.

If you believe that Obama has committed any crime, show me. Show me the crimes, show me the evidence of those crimes.

Again, obviously not you. You don't read or research. But someone in the thread other than myself surely does.
typical lib, makes claims but never has any proof.
 
actually the millions spent on Mueller proved that there was no Russian influence. but he wasted taxpayer money on what anyone with common sense already knew.
That's a bizarre and silly lie. And I remember you making this one before. So a pointless, bizarre and silly lie. Which begs the question, why make it?

Do you have no idea what's in the Mueller report? Or is it like those most recent favorable polls you invented, where you imagine things and then believe your imagination?

At any rate, here's actual Mueller report.

And after you get through the table of on contents, it has an introduction. The 2nd sentence of that introduction is this:

"The Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and systematic fashion."
 
typical lib, makes claims but never has any proof.

What am I supposed to prove exactly? Are you demanding that I prove Obama innocent of any accusation that Trump has made up?

Why would I need to? His innocence is presumed. You'll need evidence of his crimes. And you have none.

See how this works?
 
That's a bizarre and silly lie. And I remember you making this one before. So a pointless, bizarre and silly lie. Which begs the question, why make it?

Do you have no idea what's in the Mueller report? Or is it like those most recent favorable polls you invented, where you imagine things and then believe your imagination?

At any rate, here's actual Mueller report.

And after you get through the table of on contents, it has an introduction. The 2nd sentence of that introduction is this:

"The Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and systematic fashion."
"We found NO EVIDENCE of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign"-Mueller Report.

Sux to be you, loser.
:banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:
 
The idiot can't even get the number of documents released right.

And yet you haven't once been able to show any evidence that Obama committed any crime. Let alone sedition, a coup, treason or election rigging.

Give me a holler if you ever manage to.
 
And yet you haven't once been able to show any evidence that Obama committed any crime. Let alone sedition, a coup, treason or election rigging.

Give me a holler if you ever manage to.
I made no claims one way or the other, unlike you.

You lied. Made shit up.

And I busted you,
 
he is exempt because we do not jail ex-presidents, if that makes you feel good, enjoy.
If we didn't jail ex-presidents, Nixon would never have resigned, and Ford would never have pardoned him.
 
"We found NO EVIDENCE of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign"-Mueller Report.

Sux to be you, loser.
:banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:

That wasn't the claim I was refuting, was it? Redfish insisted "actually the millions spent on Mueller proved that there was no Russian influence".

Which is an obvious lie.

And have you managed to find any evidence that Obama committed any crime? Let alone sedition, treason, treasonous conspiracy, a coup, or election rigging?

I'm guessing the excuses why you can't are next.
 
That wasn’t a sanction.

Yes Trump, Italy, Germany and Japan have all supported brining Russia back.

Alienated them has not ended the war.

And Obama doing their dirty work in 2016 here has only made things worse
Kicking Russia out of the G8 is a sanction


sanc·tion
noun
1. a threatened penalty for disobeying a law or rule.
 
15th post
I made no claims one way or the other, unlike you.

You lied. Made shit up.

And I busted you,

So no. You have zero evidence that Obama committed any crime. Let alone sedition, a coup, treason, treasonous conspiracy or election rigging. Well that was easy!

I accept your concession with all the grace and patience it deserves.

Anyone else care to take a shot?
 
I don't see obozo going to jail, but exposing his corruption is enough.
John Durham already took a swing at that and struck out in embarrassing fashion. Much to the disappointment of nitwits who were salivating over revelations that never came.
 
actually the millions spent on Mueller proved that there was no Russian influence. but he wasted taxpayer money on what anyone with common sense already knew.
Just the opposite. Mueller showed there was Russian interference, that could have influenced the election.
They did not attempt to quantify the amount of interference.

Remember they indicted Russians for their acts of interfering in the election.
 
John Durham already took a swing at that and struck out in embarrassing fashion. Much to the disappointment of nitwits who were salivating over revelations that never came.

Its this enduring fantasy of MAGA. And as ethereal as a wish upon the northern star.

With 'irrefutable proof'.....until you actually ask to see it. Then its just excuses why have no such proof.
 
Back
Top Bottom