Obama can't be prosecuted. You can thank Trump for that.

[Skylar]

polls are lies and propaganda, no matter who publishes them. I was merely refuting your lies in your first post.

So if polls are lies and propaganda, why did you make 'most recent polls' that showed Trump with high favorability? Those polls don't actually exist, with the most recent polls showing record low favorability.

It seems odd that you imagine and invent polls to support your claims when think polls are lies and propaganda. Its almost like your standard are changing with every post, beceause you don't know what you're talking about.

 

[rightwinger]

exempt for all official acts as president, corrupt influencing of an election is not an official act of president. But rest easy, obozo will not be prosecuted, he and big mike will walk free and rich forever thanks to idiots like you.

Obama was acting in his role as President in the best interests of the country

Aren’t you glad SCOTUS exempts him from prosecution?

 

[Lisa558]

good point, they always side against the USA.

Remember when Trump ordered that Solemeni - the #1 Islamic terrorist - be taken out how the libs cried that he killed “an honored General”?

 

[Skylar]

Warch them flail and spin.

I've reviewed the evidence. There's nothing there. Obama ordered a full review of the ICA on December 6th. There's no indication that he ordered that review to include mention of Russia favoring Trump.

So, where's the sedition, or coup, or election rigging, or treason or treasonous conspiracy.

Because the evidence presented by Gabbard simply don't match the claims she and Trump were making.

 

[Lisa558]

I think you should concentrate on the muslim corruption that is destroying your own country before commenting on ours.

Postman’s from England? Or France?

 

[Redfish]

So if polls are lies and propaganda, why did you make 'most recent polls' that showed Trump with high favorability? Those polls don't actually exist, with the most recent polls showing record low favorability.

It seems odd that you imagine and invent polls to support your claims when think polls are lies and propaganda. Its almost like your standard are changing with every post, beceause you don't know what you're talking about.

those polls do exist, CNN had one, my only point is that the polls reflect the views of the people paying for the polls. Is CNN exempt from bribes? I think not.

 

[Lisa558]

I've reviewed the evidence. There's nothing there. Obama ordered a full review of the ICA on December 6th. There's no indication that he ordered that review to include mention of Russia favoring Trump.

So, where's the sedition, or coup, or election rigging, or treason or treasonous conspiracy.

Because the evidence presented by Gabbard simply don't match the claims she and Trump were making.

Riiiiight…..you reviewed the evidence. ha!

 

[rightwinger]

Where is 'corrupt influencing of an election' in the USC? What does that even mean? Or like the recent favorable polling for Trump, is it something you just made up?

Also, I'm not sure how that works. Obama's only direct role in any of this was his order for a full review of the ICA on Demember 6th 2016, with the ICA review completed weeks later.

The election was in Novemer. Did the ICA report come in a blue police box or a delorian perhaps?

Chalk it up with Republican investigation of Hillary…..Whitewater, Seth Rich murder, Pizza Gate, private server…..BENGHAZI!

Only crimes in Conservative propaganda

 

[Redfish]

I've reviewed the evidence. There's nothing there. Obama ordered a full review of the ICA on December 6th. There's no indication that he ordered that review to include mention of Russia favoring Trump.

So, where's the sedition, or coup, or election rigging, or treason or treasonous conspiracy.

Because the evidence presented by Gabbard simply don't match the claims she and Trump were making.

it's coming out, your idols are falling, stand by

 

[Skylar]

the evidence is being released, standby to watch your false idols fall.

But Trump said that Gabbard already had irrefutable proof of sedition, coups, election rigging and treason by Obama.

Yet she didn't present any such irrefutable proof. And now you're telling me that the evidence is 'coming'?

I think maybe the 'coming evidence' is like those most recent favorable polls for Trump; something you're making up because you're indoctrinated.

 

[Redfish]

Chalk it up with Republican investigation of Hillary…..Whitewater, Seth Rich murder, Pizza Gate, private server…..BENGHAZI!

Only crimes in Conservative propaganda

thanks for listing once again Hillary's many crimes, but she is exempt from the laws that apply to you and me, right?

 

[Skylar]

it's coming out, your idols are falling, stand by

Welp, so much for the 'irrefutable proof'.

Now we just have promises of imaginary future evidence from random souls on the internet.

Not exactly was Trump described, is it?

 

[postman]

just because it fooled many does not make it valid. have you sent your alms to king Charlie today, or are you now sending to the mullahs who really run your country?

just because it fooled many does not make it valid.

Amazing, that's what I said about George W. Bushes invasion of Iraq.

 

[Nostra]

It's like comparing a fever of 104 degrees with one of 99 degrees

And saying they're both fevers.

Obama brought the war fever way down.

How? By not getting out of Afghanistan and bombing 7 countries?

 

[Redfish]

Obama was acting in his role as President in the best interests of the country

Aren’t you glad SCOTUS exempts him from prosecution?

he is exempt because we do not jail ex-presidents, if that makes you feel good, enjoy.

 

[BlindBoo]

It's like comparing a fever of 104 degrees with one of 99 degrees

And saying they're both fevers.

Obama brought the war fever way down.

Only in a Rhetorical way mostly. US Interventionist foreign policy since the end of WWII is the patient with the fever. His election helped lower the fever but his actions did little to cure the illness, if it can be called an illness.

 

[Nostra]

They gave Trump a copy of it.
And Marco Rubio headed the committee that confirmed it.

A copy of what? Barry Hussein and Hitlery's fake Russian propaganda they paid for?

 

[Redfish]

Welp, so much for the 'irrefutable proof'.

Now we just have promises of imaginary future evidence from random souls on the internet.

Not exactly was Trump described, is it?

Tulsi is not lying, there is hard evidence and its being released as we speak.

 

[postman]

thanks for listing once again Hillary's many crimes, but she is exempt from the laws that apply to you and me, right?

Maybe you missed the memo. Republicans already admitted their dozen Benghazi investigations were just a political stunt.

 

[rightwinger]

he is exempt because we do not jail ex-presidents, if that makes you feel good, enjoy.

He is exempt from anything that is an official act.
Show that it wasn’t