Obama can't be prosecuted. You can thank Trump for that.

Hey dumb ****, Congress can’t impose sanctions without the president signing the bill into law

If over 2/3rds of both houses voted for the sanctions, even if the President VETO'd it, the sanctions would go into law.


Senate overwhelmingly passes Russia sanctions deal with new limits on Trump

The 97-2 vote on the Russia sanctions plan

...complicating the politics of any future veto threat from the Trump administration.
Haha trump didn’t veto any sanctions you dumb ****
 
"pay me to do a poll and I will give you the result you pay for" polls today are designed to influence public opinion, not to report on it. We both know that, so let's stop playing games.

So now you just moved your goal post. You said that all the recent polls were high for Trump. But that wasn't true. The most recent polls have Trump underwater by 11 and 13 points respectively. The 13 point spread being the greatest in US polling history save for one president: Trump himself.

And when 10 of the last 12 polls show Trump underwater on favorability, you reject polling.

I can't use polling, even the polls you claim to be citing, to convince you. You'll invent or imagine favorable polling, while ignoring the actual polls. You're literally citing a poll you imagined and made up over 2 actual polls.

You're simply too indoctrinated for evidence to influence.
 
Afraid it was
It was exceptionally broad to the extent of a President is above the law (which the court chose to not exclude)
exempt for all official acts as president, corrupt influencing of an election is not an official act of president. But rest easy, obozo will not be prosecuted, he and big mike will walk free and rich forever thanks to idiots like you.
 
She revealed the same conspiracy theory that has been floating around for years, For god's sake get some new material.
No she hasn’t. There was nothing previously that showed Obama’s direct involvement in coordinating a coup.
 
The opinion gave the president great deference to his determination of what were president acts.
Coordinating a coup against the incoming president is not part of his official acts.
 
Obama is the only president in US history that sabotaged the incoming president.....says who? Backed by what evidence?

That's just a plain old begging the question fallacy, where your argument is dependent on us just assuming that your claim must be true. Despite the lack of evidence backing the claim.

And Trump already overplayed his hand on this one. Trump insisted that Gabbard had irrefutable proof that Obama committed treason, a coup, sedition and election rigging. Yet when Gabbard spoke at the news conference, she presented accusations backed by nothing. Just her droning on with sundry accusations affirmed by no actual evidence.

And she didn't even mention treason. Or a coup. Or sedition. Or election rigging.

If she had that evidence, she would have presented it. She made nothing but accusations. That's not 'irrefutable proof' of anything but Trump making up more stupid shit.
Since when have you EVER seen an investigation lay out all the evidence before anyone has even been charged? That isnt a thing, retard. What she did detail was extremely alarming though. :cuckoo:
 
Last edited:
So now you just moved your goal post. You said that all the recent polls were high for Trump. But that wasn't true. The most recent polls have Trump underwater by 11 and 13 points respectively. The 13 point spread being the greatest in US polling history save for one president: Trump himself.

And when 10 of the last 12 polls show Trump underwater on favorability, you reject polling.

I can't use polling, even the polls you claim to be citing, to convince you. You'll invent or imagine favorable polling, while ignoring the actual polls. You're literally citing a poll you imagined and made up over 2 actual polls.

You're simply too indoctrinated for evidence to influence.
polls are lies and propaganda, no matter who publishes them. I was merely refuting your lies in your first post.
 
Obama reversed American policy toward starting unsanctioned wars of aggression.
But he had to have a go with the Surge escalation in Afghanistan. That failure led him to realize the hopelessness of the occupation. He, Like GWB, would have left troops in Iraq if those troops were granted immunity from Iraqi law. He also drastically increased the Drone War in Yemen as well. He may not have been as aggressive as the Bushes, but he was active.
 
Laughing.....you can't touch Obama. You know it. I know it. Bondi knows it.

This is just more meaningless theater for dipshits, like Trump showing pictures of imaginary MS-13 tattoos on knuckles.

All so that that your ilk can try and cover up Trump's association with known pedophile and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.
.

We understand that you think you believe this.





.
 
exempt for all official acts as president, corrupt influencing of an election is not an official act of president. But rest easy, obozo will not be prosecuted, he and big mike will walk free and rich forever thanks to idiots like you.
Obama was acting on National Security, an official presidential act.
He got an intelligence report of a foreign government interfering in an election.
That same report was given to Trump.
And that same report was confirmed by Marco Rubio as head of the senate committee investigating it.
 
15th post
Trump already overplayed his hand and obliterated what precious little credibility his administration had on this issue. He promised us Gabbard had irrefutable proof of treason, sedition, election rigging and a coup.

And instead, she presented a series of accusations backed by nothing that were red meat only to the MAGA faithful. While being a boring, droning bucket of jackshit to everyone else.

Worse, Trump has already demonstrated a willingness to fabricate fake evidence. As he did with his fake photo of an 'MS-13 tattoo on Garcia's knuckles'. This administration burned their credibility for kindling with their lies about the Epstein files. So who, other than the MAGA faithful, are going to give the slightest shit about this?

This is theater for morons. Legally, its pseudo legal gibberish. And as a distraction to the Trump admins suppression of evidence of Trump and Epstein, its a sad failure.
I dont care what trump “promised”

When the facts come out thats all that matters

You will defend Obama till your dying breath no matter what

And maybe we will never see obsma go to jail

In fact, probably not

But others around him may not be so lucky
 
Obama was acting on National Security, an official presidential act.
He got an intelligence report of a foreign government interfering in an election.
That same report was given to Trump.
And that same report was confirmed by Marco Rubio as head of the senate committee investigating it.
Lies.
 
exempt for all official acts as president, corrupt influencing of an election is not an official act of president. But rest easy, obozo will not be prosecuted, he and big mike will walk free and rich forever thanks to idiots like you.

Where is 'corrupt influencing of an election' in the USC? What does that even mean? Or like the recent favorable polling for Trump, is it something you just made up?

Also, I'm not sure how that works. Obama's only direct role in any of this was his order for a full review of the ICA on Demember 6th 2016, with the ICA review completed weeks later.

The election was in Novemer. Did the ICA report come in a blue police box or a delorian perhaps?
 
Back
Top Bottom