Obama can't be prosecuted. You can thank Trump for that.

[rightwinger]

Tulsi is not lying, there is hard evidence and its being released as we speak.

emails that prove nothing let alone anything criminal

 

[Skylar]

Riiiiight…..you reviewed the evidence. ha!

Yup. All 46 pages.

Of the two of us, I'm the only one who has. Which is why I'm citing specific dates and passages. And you're being uselessly vague in references to 'emails' that can neither provide nor describe.

And you have yet to be able to explain what Obama did exactly that constitutes any crime. Let alone treason, sedition, election rigging, or a coup.

For your edification, mention of Obama ordering the ICA review is on page 45 of 46. You'll never look, but someone reading this might find that information useful.

 

[Redfish]

emails that prove nothing let alone anything criminal

keep thinking that as your idols fall

 

[postman]

Tulsi is not lying, there is hard evidence and its being released as we speak.

Just like Epstein's client list?

 

[Nostra]

I've reviewed the evidence. There's nothing there. Obama ordered a full review of the ICA on December 6th. There's no indication that he ordered that review to include mention of Russia favoring Trump.

So, where's the sedition, or coup, or election rigging, or treason or treasonous conspiracy.

Because the evidence presented by Gabbard simply don't match the claims she and Trump were making.

Post this evidence you have reviewed here Skylar
'

I say you can't because you are a lying sack of vermin shit. Prove me wrong.

GO!

 

[struth]

The opinion gave the president great deference to his determination of what were president acts.

No dumb ****, the president doesn’t make determination. A court would if it’s litigated

Obama is going to have to make that defense, and the court will decide

You dembots need a civics lesson

 

[Skylar]

Tulsi is not lying, there is hard evidence and its being released as we speak.

I've reviewed the documents she released to support her claim. They don't match her claims even remotely.

Perhaps you could imagine some more evidence for her more favorable to your indoctrination?

 

[Redfish]

He is exempt from anything that is an official act.
Show that it wasn’t

how is using lies about a foreign country to influence an American election an official act of a US president?

 

[Nostra]

Welp, so much for the 'irrefutable proof'.

Now we just have promises of imaginary future evidence from random souls on the internet.

Not exactly was Trump described, is it?

Where is your evidence Skylar ?

Surely you can back up your claims, right?

 

[Redfish]

I've reviewed the documents she released to support her claim. They don't match her claims even remotely.

Perhaps you could imagine some more evidence for her more favorable to your indoctrination?

you personally have reviewed all pages of them? sure you have.

 

[jknowgood]

he is exempt because we do not jail ex-presidents, if that makes you feel good, enjoy.

Except they did with Trump.

 

[Nostra]

Maybe you missed the memo. Republicans already admitted their dozen Benghazi investigations were just a political stunt.

Link?

 

[Nostra]

emails that prove nothing let alone anything criminal

You have seen all the evidence she sent to the DOJ?

Post it.

I say you are a lying sack of vermin shit.

Prove me wrong.

GO!

 

[Redfish]

Except they did with Trump.

they tried but failed

 

[Nostra]

Yup. All 46 pages.

Of the two of us, I'm the only one who has. Which is why I'm citing specific dates and passages. And you're being uselessly vague in references to 'emails' that can neither provide nor describe.

And you have yet to be able to explain what Obama did exactly that constitutes any crime. Let alone treason, sedition, election rigging, or a coup.

For your edification, mention of Obama ordering the ICA review is on page 45 of 46. You'll never look, but someone reading this might find that information useful.

Post all 46 pages.

The tell us why you think that is all the evidence Gabbert sent to the DOJ.

Let's see your "evidence", Simp.

 

[rightwinger]

how is using lies about a foreign country to influence an American election an official act of a US president?

Obama investigated claims of Russian interference
As any President should.
Mueller investigation along with CIA and FBI showed Russian interference

 

[Skylar]

Post this evidence you have reviewed here Skylar
'

I say you can't because you are a lying sack of vermin shit. Prove me wrong.

GO!

Nostra....you don't read. You don't research. You insult people and give excuses why you don't read or research. That's your schtick.

As y'all are the ones making these rather melodramatic claims of sedition, treason, coups, treasonous conspiracy and election rigging......perhaps you could show me the evidence supporting these claims.

Not you, obviously. You have no idea what you're talking about. But someone on this thread?

I'm looking right at the documents that Gabbard released. All 46 pages of them, in pdf format. So if y'all make up nonsense, I'll know immediate.

Show me.

 

[rightwinger]

You have seen all the evidence she sent to the DOJ?

Post it.

I say you are a lying sack of vermin shit.

Prove me wrong.

GO!

Sorry Skippy

Your link privileges have been suspended

 

[struth]

Trump tried to overturn the sanction of kicking Russia out of the G8

That wasn’t a sanction.

Yes Trump, Italy, Germany and Japan have all supported brining Russia back.

Alienated them has not ended the war.

And Obama doing their dirty work in 2016 here has only made things worse

 

[Skylar]

Where is your evidence Skylar ?

Surely you can back up your claims, right?

My evidence of what? I'm under no obligation to prove Obama innocent of whatever y'all make up.

If you believe that Obama has committed any crime, show me. Show me the crimes, show me the evidence of those crimes.

Again, obviously not you. You don't read or research. But someone in the thread other than myself surely does.