Obama can't be prosecuted. You can thank Trump for that.

[Lisa558]

Since when have you EVER seen an investigation lay out all the evidence before anyone has even been charged? That isnt a rhing, retard. What she did detail was extremely alarming though.

And Skylar didn’t even bother to listen to it.

If libs can’t actually silence the opposition, they put their hands over over their ears to effect the same thing.

 

[Redfish]

Did any wars break out?

And once again. Trump. Iran. Mirror.

Iran attacked Israel, destroying their nuclear capability saved Israel and made the entire world safer, it was no a war as you claimed, it was a demolition to preclude a war.

 

[Mac-7]

He got an intelligence report of a foreign government interfering in an election.

Thats obam’s cover story

But the accusation against him is very different

 

[postman]

But he had to have a go with the Surge escalation in Afghanistan. That failure led him to realize the hopelessness of the occupation. He, Like GWB, would have left troops in Iraq if those troops were granted immunity from Iraqi law. He also drastically increased the Drone War in Yemen as well. He may not have been as aggressive as the Bushes, but he was active.

It's like comparing a fever of 104 degrees with one of 99 degrees

And saying they're both fevers.

Obama brought the war fever way down.

 

[Eman623]

So what crime would Obama be indicted for? Specifically?

The 'smoking gun' in the report released by Gabbard was Obama ordering a full review and rewrite of the ICA on December 6th 2016. With zero indication that Obama ordered the inclusion of mention that Russia preferred Trump win the election.

So......how is that a crime? Sedition? Or a coup? Or election rigging? Or treason? Or 'treasonous conspiracy'?

And if it isn't, why would Obama be indicted?

Obama could be charged with some of the same crimes Trump was charged with in the Jan 6 matter: conspiracy to defraud the United States and conspiracy against rights.

 

[Redfish]

Obama was acting on National Security, an official presidential act.
He got an intelligence report of a foreign government interfering in an election.
That same report was given to Trump.
And that same report was confirmed by Marco Rubio as head of the senate committee investigating it.

just because it fooled many does not make it valid. have you sent your alms to king Charlie today, or are you now sending to the mullahs who really run your country?

 

[postman]

Iran attacked Israel, destroying their nuclear capability saved Israel and made the entire world safer, it was no a war as you claimed, it was a demolition to preclude a war.

Netanyahu has been saying Iran was six months away from making a nuclear weapon for the last 20+ years.

 

[postman]

Thats obam’s cover story

But the accusation against him is very different

They gave Trump a copy of it.
And Marco Rubio headed the committee that confirmed it.

 

[Redfish]

Obama could be charged with some of the same crimes Trump was charged with in the Jan 6 matter: conspiracy to defraud the United States and conspiracy against rights.

peacefully and patriotically is not an insurrection.

 

[Godboy]

What I find the most fascinating about this isn't the accusations against Obama. That's just meaningless pseudo-legal gibberish that barely warranted a 3 sentence reply.

But how central the victim mindset is to the MAGA movement. How fixated they are on fantasies about Obama. And how these fantasies, when piqued, manifest as Obama absolutely ******* Trump. Over and over.

"Obamas smear completely hamstrung Trumps first administration"

Do you not hear how cucky that sounds? How predicated on helplessness and emotional commitment to the idea of Trump being held down and completely fucked by Obama personally? Overpowered, outplayed, outmatched, so that even years later, even when Obama wasn't in power.....

......Trump was still completely hamstrung. Helpless. A victim.

The MAGA movement really should come with an 8-ball gag and pretty pink chastity cage. With sparkles!

Trumps team was bogged down with russian spy accusations. His administration was being subpeonad, grilled and harrassed for at least 3 years. All of Trumps political cache was being exhausted on it, when all that time and effort could have been spent on helping America thrive.

What your party did will not ever be forgotten. Obamas legacy will pay the price for it, but so will democrats. We no longer have to behave with any ethics when dealing with your party. We can do any scumbag thing we want now and you will have no legs to stand on when you complain about it. This is not good for the nation, but your party created this new environment, so buckle the **** up. We are coming for blood now.

 

[Lisa558]

Where is 'corrupt influencing of an election' in the USC? What does that even mean? Or like the recent favorable polling for Trump, is it something you just made up?

Also, I'm not sure how that works. Obama's only direct role in any of this was his order for a full review of the ICA on Demember 6th 2016, with the ICA review completed weeks later.

The election was in Novemer. Did the ICA report come in a blue police box or a delorian perhaps?

Wow. You certainly didn’t object when the corrupt prosecutors claimed Trump was guilty of election interference because of a bookkeeping entry to keep the stripper quiet.

I can see how the libs are doing to defend this, once it is proven how Obama coordinated the entire thing. They’re going to claim there’s nothing illegal about election interference by fabricating a hoax.

 

[Redfish]

They gave Trump a copy of it.
And Marco Rubio headed the committee that confirmed it.

I think you should concentrate on the muslim corruption that is destroying your own country before commenting on ours.

 

[Skylar]

I dont care what trump “promised”

You should. As the spectacular failure of Gabbard to deliver what Trump promised she had obliterated Trump's crediblity on the isseue for every one but the MAGA faithful. And they hated Obama already.

When the facts come out thats all that matters

Oh, so you're relying on imagined future evidence that you don't have, but you assume exists. Imaginary evidence isn't really a thing. That's just making stuff up.

You will defend Obama till your dying breath no matter what

Or....I'll just follow the evidence. Lets take Gabbards source document. 46 pages, with a grand total of 2 references to Obama relevant to any of her claims.

It says that on December 6th 2016 ordered a full review on the ICA on Russian interference in the 2016 election. No where does it state that Obama ordered that the reviewed ICA must include reference to Russia's preference for Trump's election.

And that's literally it.

So how is that sedition. Or a coup. Or rigging an election? Or treason? Or treasonous conspiracy?

Gabbard's and Trump's claims don't match their supposed evidence to support those claims. Explain it to me.

 

[jknowgood]

There's zero evidence that Obama directed intel folks to create a false narrative to feed to the press to undermine his successor.

There's the story being pushed by the Trump administration to try and distract from their Epstein scandal, backed by jack shit, from the same Trum admin that manufactured fake evidence of MS-13 tattoos on the knuckles of a man that sent to prison without charges or conviction of any crime.

Good ******* luck with that. There's a fantastic reason why the bullshit Trump and his people say in press conferences has little to nothing to do with what they say in court.

This is just more theater for chaw-slawing, shit kicking, mouth breathers.

Over 300 documents says you're wrong. Thousands more of needed.

 

[Redfish]

You should. As the spectacular failure of Gabbard to deliver what Trump promised she had obliterated Trump's crediblity on the isseue for every one but the MAGA faithful. And they hated Obama already.



Oh, so you're relying on imagined future evidence that you don't have, but you assume exists. Imaginary evidence isn't really a thing. That's just making stuff up.




Or....I'll just follow the evidence. Lets take Gabbards source document. 46 pages, with a grand total of 2 references to Obama relevant to any of her claims.

It says that on December 6th 2016 ordered a full review on the ICA on Russian interference in the 2016 election. No where does it state that Obama ordered that the reviewed ICA must include reference to Russia's preference for Trump's election.

And that's literally it.

So how is that sedition. Or a coup. Or rigging an election? Or treason? Or treasonous conspiracy?

Gabbard's and Trump's claims don't match their supposed evidence to support those claims. Explain it to me.

the evidence is being released, standby to watch your false idols fall.

 

[Lisa558]

Iran attacked Israel, destroying their nuclear capability saved Israel and made the entire world safer, it was no a war as you claimed, it was a demolition to preclude a war.

You forget - the libs are on Iran’s side in all this.

 

[22lcidw]

So now you just moved your goal post. You said that all the recent polls were high for Trump. But that wasn't true. The most recent polls have Trump underwater by 11 and 13 points respectively. The 13 point spread being the greatest in US polling history save for one president: Trump himself.

And when 10 of the last 12 polls show Trump underwater on favorability, you reject polling.

I can't use polling, even the polls you claim to be citing, to convince you. You'll invent or imagine favorable polling, while ignoring the actual polls. You're literally citing a poll you imagined and made up over 2 actual polls.

You're simply too indoctrinated for evidence to influence.

To put the corrupted pollsters into slave camps for their lies is owed to them.

 

[jknowgood]

So they either created a false narrative about Epstein before the election to try and gain politically on sex trafficking and rape of children.

Or they're frantically working to cover up the very evidence that affirms the sex trafficking and rape of children.....to protect the known associate of Jeffrey Epstein, President Trump.

Either is ******* vile. And a perfect demonstration of what 'transparency' and 'accountability' means to Trump and MAGA.

Actually Trump is trying to get the original report on Epstein released and Obama appointed judges are blocking it. Would you like to tell us why?

 

[Redfish]

You forget - the libs are on Iran’s side in all this.

good point, they always side against the USA.

 

[Lisa558]

the evidence is being released, standby to watch your false idols fall.

Warch them flail and spin.