Obama can't be prosecuted. You can thank Trump for that.

[postman]

started by dems, ended by republicans

For a red-fish, you jumped the shark.

 

[Skylar]

you are simply wrong, but you are free to be wrong, so carry on.

Says you, citing yourself. Why would I ignore poll after poll after poll on Trump's favorability....and instead believe some random guy on the internet who insists he knows better?

I can't think of a single reason. Can you? Your argument is essentially 'uh-uh'. That's not exactly compelling.

 

[postman]

obozo got one for being elected, did he earn that?

Obama reversed American policy toward starting unsanctioned wars of aggression.

 

[Seymour Flops]

This thread doesn't discuss how horrible you might think Obama is, or if he is guilty of treason. None of those thing matter. The SC granted trump, and all presidents immunity from prosecution for anything that can remotely be tied to his powers as president. Can you think of a legal reason why trump was able to walk, but Obama should be charged?
If so, now is the time to educate us all. I look forward to your reasoned legal opinion.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

Good.

Unlike Democrats and "not Democrats" I have no desire to see a man who was overwhelmingly elected president to later be prosecuted and sent to prison when the opposite party is in power.

Enough that we know the lengths to which Democrats and "not Democrats" will go keep the voters from chosing their leaders.

 

[Redfish]

Says you, citing yourself. Why would I ignore poll after poll after poll on Trump's favorability....and instead believe some random guy on the internet who insists he knows better?

I can't think of a single reason. Can you? Your argument is essentially 'uh-uh'. That's not exactly compelling.

all recent polls have him with high approval ratings, even the ones from CNN. which polls specifically are you trying to cite?

 

[Skylar]

he has made himself a billionaire through hard work and good decisions and good negotiations, your jealousy is obvious. he is turning the country around, why is that a bad thing? what is obvious is that you display hate for him because you have been a victim of the left witn media lies.

He's benefited himself through his entire career.

Why would now be any different? You're imagining this fantasy where Trump is taking tremendous political damage, angering his own base, more underwater on his favorability than any president in US history, with members of his own party breaking rank to release the Epstein files.....

...........because he wants to sacrifice himself for the innocent on the list?

That's quite the story. And doesn't make the slightest bit of sense. Its overwhelmingly likely, based on Trump's history of benefiting himself that he's taking this political damage because what is in the Epstein files would damage him more.

 

[berg80]

MAGA cult members are saying he is guilty of treason.

Of course they are. But they're mindless lemmings who parrot what they are told.


“Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response. But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a week attempt at distraction. Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes. These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio.”
Barack Obama Fires Back at Trump in Rare Statement

 

[Redfish]

Good.

Unlike Democrats and "not Democrats" I have no desire to see a man who was overwhelmingly elected president to later be prosecuted and sent to prison when the opposite party is in power.

Enough that we know the lengths to which Democrats and "not Democrats" will go keep the voters from chosing their leaders.

I don't see obozo going to jail, but exposing his corruption is enough.

 

[struth]

No... Congress imposed sanctions against Russia.

Trump tried to lift sanctions.

Hey dumb ****, Congress can’t impose sanctions without the president signing the bill into law

Trump literally signed into law the CAATSA

Your lying and gaslighting won’t change the fact Obama literally did Putin’s work for him back in 2016

 

[hadit]

I am thinking for myself. And from meme coins to payoffs from CBS, Facebook, Amazon and others......Trump acts to benefit himself. He has through his entire career.

Why would now be any different?

Because we had 4 entire years where his net worth shrank and he didn't even take his own salary.

 

[22lcidw]

He's benefited himself through his entire career.

Why would now be any different? You're imagining this fantasy where Trump is taking tremendous political damage, angering his own base, more underwater on his favorability than any president in US history, with members of his own party breaking rank to release the Epstein files.....

...........because he wants to sacrifice himself for the innocent on the list?

That's quite the story. And doesn't make the slightest bit of sense. Its overwhelmingly likely, based on Trump's history of benefiting himself that he's taking this political damage because what is in the Epstein files would damage him more.

I do not see himself wanting to be President if his negatives would destroy him from your views.

 

[hadit]

I don't see obozo going to jail, but exposing his corruption is enough.

Let the people decide how much of his legacy should remain intact and how much his party should be punished at the ballot box.

 

[Nostra]

Sure it is. Anything related to presidential action is immune

You are so full of shit your eyes are brown.

 

[Redfish]

Let the people decide how much of his legacy should remain intact and how much his party should be punished at the ballot box.

I agree, but the exposure should be complete and some of his underlings should go to jail.

 

[Skylar]

all recent polls have him with high approval ratings, even the ones from CNN. which polls specifically are you trying to cite?

All of them except the 5 I just quoted, right? And 10 out of 12 polls recorded in real clear politics since Aprilfor the that has him completely underwater on favorability, right? With the most recent polls something him 13 points and 11 points underwater.

https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/favorability/donald-trump

Remember, you're hopeless indoctrinated. So you're an unreliable narrator, more than willing to make up imaginary positive polling for Trump that doesn't actually exist.

I'll stick with the actual polls, thank you. And leave the imagination to you.

 

[Redfish]

All of them except the 5 I just quoted, right? And 10 out of 12 polls recorded in real clear politics since Aprilfor the that has him completely underwater on favorability, right? With the most recent polls something him 13 points and 11 points underwater.

https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/favorability/donald-trump

Remember, you're hopeless indoctrinated. So you're an unreliable narrator, more than willing to make up imaginary positive polling for Trump that doesn't actually exist.

I'll stick with the actual polls, thank you. And leave the imagination to you.

"pay me to do a poll and I will give you the result you pay for" polls today are designed to influence public opinion, not to report on it. We both know that, so let's stop playing games.

 

[Nostra]

Obama reversed American policy toward starting unsanctioned wars of aggression.

Bombed 7 countries with no declaration of war, dumbass.

 

[rightwinger]

Nope, not what the SCOTUS decision said.

Afraid it was
It was exceptionally broad to the extent of a President is above the law (which the court chose to not exclude)

 

[postman]

Hey dumb ****, Congress can’t impose sanctions without the president signing the bill into law

Trump literally signed into law the CAATSA

Your lying and gaslighting won’t change the fact Obama literally did Putin’s work for him back in 2016

Hey dumb ****, Congress can’t impose sanctions without the president signing the bill into law

If over 2/3rds of both houses voted for the sanctions, even if the President VETO'd it, the sanctions would go into law.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/14/senate-passes-russia-sanctions-trump-limits-239553

Senate overwhelmingly passes Russia sanctions deal with new limits on Trump

The 97-2 vote on the Russia sanctions plan

...complicating the politics of any future veto threat from the Trump administration.

 

[Nostra]

Afraid it was
It was exceptionally broad to the extent of a President is above the law (which the court chose to not exclude)

Lies.