Obama Cancels Christmas

[IsaacNewton]

Conservatives, I know use of a dictionary is foreign to you, so much so you don't know what foreign means and you won't look it up in the dictionary.

Please find an online dictionary and see 'hyperbole'.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Where do you guys get this horseshit from and why would it matter? The Federal Government doesn't have a religion, by law.

You can't totally ban a religion.

The purpose of the bill of rights is to prevent such actions

No religion is being banned, and there is no religion of State or Federal property. It's neutral, by law.

Well - sort of. It's supposed to be "One Nation Under God," however, with the state of the nation under Obama's (ahem) leadership, it seems to be morphing to "One Nation Under God, Allah, and whatever other religious terrorist group intimidates us."

No its not and no its not.

Serious questions: How did the RWNJs get to be this ignorant about their own country? Why do they hate their own country? Why do they LIE about their country? Why do they hate the US Constitution?

And, damn. How is it that this poster SAYs he military and yet obviously hates the military and is utterly against what our military has fought for?

 

[SeniorChief_Polock]

Where do you guys get this horseshit from and why would it matter? The Federal Government doesn't have a religion, by law.

You can't totally ban a religion.

The purpose of the bill of rights is to prevent such actions

No religion is being banned, and there is no religion of State or Federal property. It's neutral, by law.

Well - sort of. It's supposed to be "One Nation Under God," however, with the state of the nation under Obama's (ahem) leadership, it seems to be morphing to "One Nation Under God, Allah, and whatever other religious terrorist group intimidates us."

It wasn't "One nation under God" when the ******* pledge was written, by a minister no less. That's you Jesus-freaks inserting God whenever you can, wanting a theocracy instead of the liberal secular nation that was founded.

I am hardly a Jesus freak, son, so calm down. You're right - Under God wasn't added to the pledge until much later, but the premise was based on Abraham Lincoln's Gettsysburg address. This country was not founded on Liberal (fudgepacking, flagburning, draftdodgeing) standards - sorry to disappoint.

 

[depotoo]

From the Declaration of Independence-
“And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.”

Providence, Divine definition

God, seen as providing for mankind, as thecaring guide of human destiny.
the definition of providence, divine







In God We Trust has been on currency since 1864.

Where do you guys get this horseshit from and why would it matter? The Federal Government doesn't have a religion, by law.

You can't totally ban a religion.

The purpose of the bill of rights is to prevent such actions

No religion is being banned, and there is no religion of State or Federal property. It's neutral, by law.

Well - sort of. It's supposed to be "One Nation Under God," however, with the state of the nation under Obama's (ahem) leadership, it seems to be morphing to "One Nation Under God, Allah, and whatever other religious terrorist group intimidates us."

It wasn't "One nation under God" when the ******* pledge was written, by a minister no less. That's you Jesus-freaks inserting God whenever you can, wanting a theocracy instead of the liberal secular nation that was founded.

 

[mudwhistle]

You can tell by the picture in the OP what the Obamas think about Christmas.

He's a hypocrite.

 

[mudwhistle]

Their disclaimer-
National Report is a news and political satire web publication, which may or may not use real names, often in semi-real or mostly fictitious ways. All news articles contained within National Report are fiction, and presumably fake news.

Disclaimer - National Report
also Paul Horner is actually one of their lead writers.

It is a fictional site.

Yeah....sure....uh-huh.

Yeah. ...sure....uh-huh.

Matters not.

It has been put out.

It is in the process of being implemented by directives or official memos.

 

[SeniorChief_Polock]

In God We Trust has been on currency since 1864.

Yeah - it took awhile to get good old God on U.S. currency. But, he's been around, well - forever!
And he will be long after this earth is gone - so he gets the last laugh.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

From the Declaration of Independence-
“And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.”

Providence, Divine definition

God, seen as providing for mankind, as thecaring guide of human destiny.
the definition of providence, divine







In God We Trust has been on currency since 1864.

Where do you guys get this horseshit from and why would it matter? The Federal Government doesn't have a religion, by law.

You can't totally ban a religion.

The purpose of the bill of rights is to prevent such actions

No religion is being banned, and there is no religion of State or Federal property. It's neutral, by law.

Well - sort of. It's supposed to be "One Nation Under God," however, with the state of the nation under Obama's (ahem) leadership, it seems to be morphing to "One Nation Under God, Allah, and whatever other religious terrorist group intimidates us."

It wasn't "One nation under God" when the ******* pledge was written, by a minister no less. That's you Jesus-freaks inserting God whenever you can, wanting a theocracy instead of the liberal secular nation that was founded.

The DOI means absolutely nothing to this nation. You might as well have quoted the Mayflower Compact, it's just as valid meaning, not at all.

 

[depotoo]

If you truly studied the founding documents, and the personal papers of our founders you would see they spoke of the persecution of the Church of England to those Christians that would not adhere to their particular beliefs. Thus why so many fleed to this country. If one is honest, they would admit they did not want to rule under one doctrine, as England did, but give the right to all to practice their own Christian doctrine, such as a Quaker, Presbyterian, Lutheran, etc.

I don't believe they ever could have imagined they would have needed to be more explicit than they were. They probably roll over in their graves, today, seeing those that want to remove all reference that was there from the beginning. As I showed above, even the Declaration of Independence speaks of Divine Providence.
Does that mean that no other non-Christian religion should be allowed? No, but it also means that we should also respect that this country was founded on Christian principals.

Dare one consult the U.S. Constitution? "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..." Celebrating Christmas in government offices is so far removed from what is prohibited that it is a joke.

"Christmas" in American society has evolved into a holiday that has almost nothing to do with celebrating the birth of Jesus Christ. One could argue that, aside from the name, the celebrations, customs, and rituals have very little to do with the religious celebration that falls on the same date.

Christmas tree? Forget about it. No connection.

Gift-giving? I don't think so. The gift giving in the Bible took place well after Christ's birth, so that's a modern invention (gift-giving at Christmas). In fact, in many Christian cultures the gift giving is on January 6th, the date when we remember the visit of the three Magi.

Santa Claus? Sort of a religious name, but the Santa Claus back-story has nothing to do with the birth of Christ or with Christianity.

"Merry Christmas"? Have a happy day when celebrating the holiday? Nothing religious about that.

If the President had balls (and if he were not a Muslim) he would simply send out a communication recognizing that our American society has created a separate secular holiday that we call Christmas, easily distinguishable from the religious celebration of the Nativity (which falls on the same day), and "we" are going to celebrate the Christmas HOLIDAY (as opposed to the Holy Day) with vigor and joy.

It would actually be a Teaching Moment for parents raising kids as Christians, emphasizing that BOTH celebrations need to be respected.

 

[mudwhistle]

Oh, the Nativity display that is always set up at the Gate 4 intersection isn't up and will not go up. Only the flood-lights remain.....as a sad testimony to political - correctness.

 

[SeniorChief_Polock]

The DOI means absolutely nothing to this nation.

It means nothing to Liberals and Islam - that's for sure. Americans seem to get it, however.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The DOI means absolutely nothing to this nation.

It means nothing to Liberals and Islam - that's for sure. Americans seem to get it, however.

No, it has no standing at all. It's a purely historical document.

 

[mudwhistle]

Conservatives, I know use of a dictionary is foreign to you, so much so you don't know what foreign means and you won't look it up in the dictionary.

Please find an online dictionary and see 'hyperbole'.

Yeah...well **** you too Mr. Fat-Face, Poopy Pants.

 

[mudwhistle]

Conservatives, I know use of a dictionary is foreign to you, so much so you don't know what foreign means and you won't look it up in the dictionary.

Please find an online dictionary and see 'hyperbole'.

Some of us have no need to look it up. We see it every day.

 

[depotoo]

You are wrong on so many levels, but I'll play along. How about our Constitution?
done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the SeventeenthDay of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth In witness whereof We have here unto subscribed our Names,

Attest

Go: Washington -Presidt. and deputy from Virginia


In the year of our Lord... Direct reference to Christ.

from the Articles of Confederation-
And Whereas it hath pleased the Great Governor of the World to incline the hearts of the legislatures we respectively represent in congress, to approve of, and to authorize us to ratify the said articles of confederation and perpetual union.

"Great Governor of the World"
Anyone can actually find online the day to day discussions by our Founders, jjst as all Congressional sessions and discussions can be found from our beginning to the present. If you took time to read through them, (they are intensive) you could no longer deny the truth, unless you prefer to lie to yourself and others because of your own hidden agenda, of convincing otherwise to those less informed.

From the Declaration of Independence-
“And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.”

Providence, Divine definition

God, seen as providing for mankind, as thecaring guide of human destiny.
the definition of providence, divine







In God We Trust has been on currency since 1864.

You can't totally ban a religion.

The purpose of the bill of rights is to prevent such actions

No religion is being banned, and there is no religion of State or Federal property. It's neutral, by law.

Well - sort of. It's supposed to be "One Nation Under God," however, with the state of the nation under Obama's (ahem) leadership, it seems to be morphing to "One Nation Under God, Allah, and whatever other religious terrorist group intimidates us."

It wasn't "One nation under God" when the ******* pledge was written, by a minister no less. That's you Jesus-freaks inserting God whenever you can, wanting a theocracy instead of the liberal secular nation that was founded.

The DOI means absolutely nothing to this nation. You might as well have quoted the Mayflower Compact, it's just as valid meaning, not at all.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Where do you guys get this horseshit from and why would it matter? The Federal Government doesn't have a religion, by law.

You can't totally ban a religion.

The purpose of the bill of rights is to prevent such actions

No religion is being banned, and there is no religion of State or Federal property. It's neutral, by law.

Well - sort of. It's supposed to be "One Nation Under God," however, with the state of the nation under Obama's (ahem) leadership, it seems to be morphing to "One Nation Under God, Allah, and whatever other religious terrorist group intimidates us."

It wasn't "One nation under God" when the ******* pledge was written, by a minister no less. That's you Jesus-freaks inserting God whenever you can, wanting a theocracy instead of the liberal secular nation that was founded.

I am hardly a Jesus freak, son, so calm down. You're right - Under God wasn't added to the pledge until much later, but the premise was based on Abraham Lincoln's Gettsysburg address. This country was not founded on Liberal (fudgepacking, flagburning, draftdodgeing) standards - sorry to disappoint.

There's that ignorance again.

"This country was not founded on Liberal (fudgepacking, flagburning, draftdodgeing) standards ..."

That's EXACTLY what the US was founded on - the freedom to be what one is rather than what the government says you must be.

SeniorChief_Polock

If you had ever served in the military, you would know that.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Conservatives, I know use of a dictionary is foreign to you, so much so you don't know what foreign means and you won't look it up in the dictionary.

Please find an online dictionary and see 'hyperbole'.

Some of us have no need to look it up. We see it every day.

Yabut, you hafta open and actually READ it.

mudwhistle - you really are an idiot. So gullible and always so willing to pass on crap that you surely must know is not true. Or, do you actually believe the crap you post?

Either way, you're a loser.

 

[depotoo]

You can deny until you pass out, but it is representative of our founding as they intended.

You progressives so want to scrub historical accountings so you can push your own fears or sadistic agenda. Unfortunately for you, they are recorded within the archives as well as many other places, and scrubbing will not work, with the informed.

The DOI means absolutely nothing to this nation.

It means nothing to Liberals and Islam - that's for sure. Americans seem to get it, however.

No, it has no standing at all. It's a purely historical document.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Conservatives, I know use of a dictionary is foreign to you, so much so you don't know what foreign means and you won't look it up in the dictionary.

Please find an online dictionary and see 'hyperbole'.

Yeah...well **** you too Mr. Fat-Face, Poopy Pants.

The Ted (child molesting, draft dodging, poacher and all around human garbage and RW hero) Nugent thread is over there.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

You can deny until you pass out, but it is representative of our founding as they intended.

You progressives so want to scrub historical accountings so you can push your own fears or sadistic agenda. Unfortunately for you, they are recorded within the archives as well as many other places, and scrubbing will not work, with the informed.

The DOI means absolutely nothing to this nation.

It means nothing to Liberals and Islam - that's for sure. Americans seem to get it, however.

No, it has no standing at all. It's a purely historical document.

Thanks for telling us what they were thinking but I'll go by what they actually wrote.