Obama authorizes air strikes and food drops in Iraq- balanced and intelligent...

[1776]

Obama is acting like this is "brand new" it "snuck up on him," he is a lying sack of shit.

The CIA has been reporting the rise in AQ affiliated groups in Syria and Iraq ever since he has been in office.

Obama just decided to ignore the mess until genocide hit the front page.

 

[Samson]

Obama is acting like this is "brand new" it "snuck up on him," he is a lying sack of shit.

The CIA has been reporting the rise in AQ affiliated groups in Syria and Iraq ever since he has been in office.

Obama just decided to ignore the mess until genocide hit the front page.

Newsflash:

Obama trying to increase his approval rating before the November elections so he can help Dems hold a majority in the Senate.

 

[Samson]

Also irrelevant, ignorant, out of historical context, and just plain irritating and Pubtroll, the only kind as far as I can tell...

Hey Franco Freak-O.........you're losing the debate in this thread ; but, what else is new?

Only in Rush/Fox/Beckbot bizarro universe, hater dupe. Sorry balance and intelligence doesn't conform to Fox etc running dog timelines and idiotic jingoist monday morning QBs lol...

Only one word short of winning the blithering idiot award for August.

I'm certain you'll keep trying. There's still 23 days left.

 

[Kosh]

Obama is acting like this is "brand new" it "snuck up on him," he is a lying sack of shit.

The CIA has been reporting the rise in AQ affiliated groups in Syria and Iraq ever since he has been in office.

Obama just decided to ignore the mess until genocide hit the front page.

You mean until he needed a political bump in the polls as the (D)'s were once again trying to separate themselves from Obama.

Obama's illegal actions (defined by the far left in 2003 to present) in Iraq may give a five point bump in the polls, but only time will tell.

 

[BlindBoo]

No we were not asked by the Iraqi government (the Kurds are not the Iraqi government) to help in that region, second please show the vote to send military assets to Syria.

But then again the Ukraine has asked for our help and Obama and the far left have looked the other way.

Under current terms we are now in volition of Iraq and their sovereign country if we follow the far left mantra from 2003 to present.

Then again if Obama was a true leader he would have come to the table and negotiate with said government and this would not be happening now.

Yes the Iraqis ask for help dealing with the mountain refugees, so of course we're not in violation of the sovereign...... I was wrong, Congress did not vote on the President's plan to attack Syria. However there was little support for it.

Still allow the far left blog sites to rule your thinking.

The Iraq government made no formal request to the US for help, if they did please post it.

As far as Syria goes, there was plenty of support, just not from the far left. So to you that means there was no to little support.

It came from the highest authority. Not that it will convince you. I mean you don't think the President would lie about that do ya?

Obama defined the mission as having two objectives. First, "to stop the advance on Erbil, I've directed our military to take targeted strikes against ISIL terrorist convoys should they move toward the city." Second, "at the request of the Iraqi government -- we've begun operations to help save Iraqi civilians stranded on the mountain."

Probably could have passed in the Senate but not the House.

Will Congress Support Military Action In Syria? A ThinkProgress Whip Count [UPDATED] | ThinkProgress

 

[Sallow]

Obama bomb countries -good, balanced, intelligent

Bush bombs countries-bad, war criminal, making more terrorist

the two faces of a liberal/Democrat is something to behold

Depends, it was good to give the Northern Alliance air support in driving out the Taliban and bombing the **** out of al Qaeda.

I think the bad part was morphing the emotion to extract revenge after 9-11 into the ground invasion and US occupation of Iraq.

The way to fight these guys is from the air and with high tech.

NOT boots on the ground.

They have to know, when you fight the US there will be a lot of shooting, but nothing to shoot at.

 

[francoHFW]

Obama is acting like this is "brand new" it "snuck up on him," he is a lying sack of shit.

The CIA has been reporting the rise in AQ affiliated groups in Syria and Iraq ever since he has been in office.

Obama just decided to ignore the mess until genocide hit the front page.

But NO ONE expected the attacks of ISIL in Iraq. If you think the CIA doesn't make mistakes, think again. At least Obama isn't cherry picking and saying they have nukes and sending in 500k troops like the great liar/idiot...

 

[Warrior102]

So Chickenhawk Obama bombs Iraq. Wasn't that war over?
How many innocent civilians did this inbred kill in the process?

Who's he bombing next? Vietnam?

 

[Peach]

Yes the Iraqis ask for help dealing with the mountain refugees, so of course we're not in violation of the sovereign...... I was wrong, Congress did not vote on the President's plan to attack Syria. However there was little support for it.

Still allow the far left blog sites to rule your thinking.

The Iraq government made no formal request to the US for help, if they did please post it.

As far as Syria goes, there was plenty of support, just not from the far left. So to you that means there was no to little support.

It came from the highest authority. Not that it will convince you. I mean you don't think the President would lie about that do ya?

Obama defined the mission as having two objectives. First, "to stop the advance on Erbil, I've directed our military to take targeted strikes against ISIL terrorist convoys should they move toward the city." Second, "at the request of the Iraqi government -- we've begun operations to help save Iraqi civilians stranded on the mountain."

Probably could have passed in the Senate but not the House.

Will Congress Support Military Action In Syria? A ThinkProgress Whip Count [UPDATED] | ThinkProgress

ThinkProgress needs to THINK, about contacting all Congress critters NOW. Other than that, relief for the 40,000 Yazidis trapped on mountains without food or water.

 

[francoHFW]

Hey Franco Freak-O.........you're losing the debate in this thread ; but, what else is new?

Only in Rush/Fox/Beckbot bizarro universe, hater dupe. Sorry balance and intelligence doesn't conform to Fox etc running dog timelines and idiotic jingoist monday morning QBs lol...

Only one word short of winning the blithering idiot award for August.

I'm certain you'll keep trying. There's still 23 days left.

I admire and respect your opinion.

Ignorant brainwashed functional moron Pubtroll.

 

[Kosh]

Yes the Iraqis ask for help dealing with the mountain refugees, so of course we're not in violation of the sovereign...... I was wrong, Congress did not vote on the President's plan to attack Syria. However there was little support for it.

Still allow the far left blog sites to rule your thinking.

The Iraq government made no formal request to the US for help, if they did please post it.

As far as Syria goes, there was plenty of support, just not from the far left. So to you that means there was no to little support.

It came from the highest authority. Not that it will convince you. I mean you don't think the President would lie about that do ya?

Obama defined the mission as having two objectives. First, "to stop the advance on Erbil, I've directed our military to take targeted strikes against ISIL terrorist convoys should they move toward the city." Second, "at the request of the Iraqi government -- we've begun operations to help save Iraqi civilians stranded on the mountain."

Probably could have passed in the Senate but not the House.

Will Congress Support Military Action In Syria? A ThinkProgress Whip Count [UPDATED] | ThinkProgress

Think progress? Really another far left blog site?

So were is the formal declaration? Is it in a secret area that only far left blog seekers can see?

There were requests from within the government, but there is no official declaration to the US wanting help. Even if there was it would have to go through the UN for approval first. That is if the far left wants to follow their own words and propaganda from 2003 to present.

 

[Stephanie]

Obama is acting like this is "brand new" it "snuck up on him," he is a lying sack of shit.

The CIA has been reporting the rise in AQ affiliated groups in Syria and Iraq ever since he has been in office.

Obama just decided to ignore the mess until genocide hit the front page.

But NO ONE expected the attacks of ISIL in Iraq. If you think the CIA doesn't make mistakes, think again. At least Obama isn't cherry picking and saying they have nukes and sending in 500k troops like the great liar/idiot...

no, he's a chicken shit who drops bombs on people without having to account for civilians who happen to be in the way, because If it's out of your sights it's out of your mind so you can pretend he's not hurting anyone like you accuse Bush of doing..

and the only ones who didn't expect Iraq to go to hell once they pulled all our troops out are you and Obama

 

[francoHFW]

Are you ignorant hater dupes kidding? Maliki and everyone else in Iraq has been begging for US air strikes since ISIL started this. WTF do you ever get that's actual journalism. YOU'RE SO GD DUMB!!

Iraq asks US for air strikes against ISIL | Stuff.co.nz
www.stuff.co.nz/.../Iraq-asks-US-for-air-strikes-against-ISIL
Stuff.co.nz
Jun 19, 2014 - Iraq asks US for air strikes against ISIL ... Maliki met Sunni and Kurdish political opponents overnight, concluding with a frosty, carefully staged ...
Iraqi PM Maliki welcomes Syrian air strikes against ISIL ...
Video for maliki asks for airstrikes against ISIL► 0:45► 0:45
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=859Ga7jw8ug]Iraqi PM Maliki welcomes Syrian air strikes against ISIL - YouTube[/ame]
Jun 27, 2014 - Uploaded by ARIRANG NEWS
Iraqi PM Maliki welcomes Syrian air strikes against ISIL ... Prime Minister Maliki told the BBC this week's attacks against ISIL militants took place on the .... Obama requests $500 mn to aid Syrian rebels by RT 11,668 views.
Iraq's Maliki begged for US air strikes against ISIL last month ...
Iraq's Maliki begged for US air strikes against ISIL last month but Obama refused
Jun 12, 2014 - 9 posts - *3 authors
Iraq's Maliki begged for US air strikes' Prime minister asked US to launch strikes against ISIL last month but Washington refused, New York ...
Obama Allows Limited Airstrikes on ISIS - NYTimes.com
www.nytimes.com/.../obama-weighs-military-strike...
The New York Times
20 hours ago - ... he had authorized targeted American airstrikes against militants in Iraq, ... in Iraq while Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki remains in office, ...
Iraq's Maliki 'appealed for US air strikes' | The Chronicle
Iraq?s Maliki ?appealed for US air strikes? | The Chronicle
Jun 13, 2014 - Iraq's prime minister has asked the United States to carry out drone and air strikes against Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) fighters, but ...
Iraq's Nouri al-Maliki Authorizes Air Strikes to Support ...
online.wsj.com/.../iraqs-nouri-al-maliki-authorize...
The Wall Street Journal
4 days ago - Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki authorized the air force to ... over the insurgents' brash new offensive against Kurds in both Iraq and Syria. .... "What's most concerning to us is the recent successes we've seen by ISIL, and ...

 

[Sallow]

Obama is acting like this is "brand new" it "snuck up on him," he is a lying sack of shit.

The CIA has been reporting the rise in AQ affiliated groups in Syria and Iraq ever since he has been in office.

Obama just decided to ignore the mess until genocide hit the front page.

But NO ONE expected the attacks of ISIL in Iraq. If you think the CIA doesn't make mistakes, think again. At least Obama isn't cherry picking and saying they have nukes and sending in 500k troops like the great liar/idiot...

no, he's a chicken shit who drops bombs on people without having to account for civilians who happen to be in the way, because If it's out of your sights it's out of your mind so you can pretend he's not hurting anyone like you accuse Bush of doing..

and the only ones who didn't expect Iraq to go to hell once they pulled all our troops out are you and Obama

There were over a quarter million Iraqi people killed during the Iraq war.

You are really something else.

You ******* forget that?

 

[francoHFW]

Obama is acting like this is "brand new" it "snuck up on him," he is a lying sack of shit.

The CIA has been reporting the rise in AQ affiliated groups in Syria and Iraq ever since he has been in office.

Obama just decided to ignore the mess until genocide hit the front page.

But NO ONE expected the attacks of ISIL in Iraq. If you think the CIA doesn't make mistakes, think again. At least Obama isn't cherry picking and saying they have nukes and sending in 500k troops like the great liar/idiot...

no, he's a chicken shit who drops bombs on people without having to account for civilians who happen to be in the way, because If it's out of your sights it's out of your mind so you can pretend he's not hurting anyone like you accuse Bush of doing..

and the only ones who didn't expect Iraq to go to hell once they pulled all our troops out are you and Obama

These are attacks on convoys and artillery posts in the desert, dingbat dupe. Much like the tank convoys in Libya that saved Bengazi and sent that terrorist/Boosh pal Khaddafi on the run. On the other hand, I'm sure you're in favor of RW Israel wiping out Gazans lol. Absolute idiot.

YOUR heroes killed hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis based on LIES.Wrecked the ME AND started a WORLD DEPRESSION. You're a total, brainwashed FOOL.

 

[Stephanie]

just ran across this, pretty much sums things up

SNIP:
When will they stop pretending this is a normal presidency?

By David Horowitz


Barack Obama deliberately set out to lose the war in Iraq, and he did. He defied the advice of his joint chiefs of staff to secure America’s formidable military presence and keep 20,000 troops in country, and left Iraq to its own devices and the tender mercies of Iran. In doing so, he betrayed every American and Iraqi who gave his life to create a free Iraq and keep it out of the clutches of the terrorists.

Iraq is now a war zone dominated by the terrorist forces of the Islamic State, whose rise Obama’s policies fostered. Both his secretaries of state praised the animal Bashar Assad as a “reformer” and a man of “peace,” helping him to thwart his domestic opposition. The Islamic State was born out of the Syrian chaos that ensued.


Far worse was Obama’s open support for America’s mortal enemy, the Muslim Brotherhood, spawner of al-Qaeda and Hamas. During the “Arab Spring,” Obama essentially put America’s weight behind the legitimization of this murderous organization that had been outlawed for 40 years for its assassinations and conspiracies against the Egyptian regime. Secretary of State Clinton gave totally unfounded assurances to the world that the Brotherhood was ready to become part of the democratic process and give up its 90-year holy war against infidels, Jews in particular but also — and explicitly — America. During the Brotherhood’s brief tenure as the government in Egypt Obama gave these genocidal zealots more than a billion dollars in American aid and F-16 fighter-bombers that could easily reach Israel’s major population centers, which for 60 years the Brotherhood had sworn to destroy.

By his feckless interventions in the Middle East, and his tacit support for the chief organization of Islam’s terror war against the West, Obama has set the Middle East on fire. All the violence in the crescent from Gaza to Iraq, including Hamas’s genocidal war against Israel, has been encouraged by Obama’s support for the Brotherhood and hostility toward the Jewish state.

Characteristic of this encouragement was his illegal intervention in Libya, which violated every principle that Obama and the Democrats invoked to attack President Bush and undermine America’s war against the Saddam regime and the terrorists in Iraq. Thanks to Obama, Libya is now in the hands of the terrorists and thousands of Libyans are fleeing to Tunisia and Egypt. Thanks to Obama, the Christian communities of Iraq, which date back to the time of Christ, are being slaughtered.

Because of Obama’s aversion to America’s role as a keeper of international peace, the tyrant Putin has been able to swallow Crimea and threaten the rest of Ukraine. Since his election in 2009, Obama’s policies have been responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of people and will result in the deaths of tens of thousands more. Thanks to his efforts to destroy America’s borders, Americans may be included in this grim toll. Certainly, Americans are now threatened by terrorists as never before.

Where is the Republican opposition? Why are Republicans still treating Obama as though his were a normal presidency and not a national disgrace? Why are there no indictments of Obama for the carnage he has enabled?

ALL of it here:
Obama?s Treachery and Republican Silence | National Review Online

 

[Sallow]

just ran across this, pretty much sums things up

SNIP:
When will they stop pretending this is a normal presidency?

By David Horowitz


Barack Obama deliberately set out to lose the war in Iraq, and he did. He defied the advice of his joint chiefs of staff to secure America’s formidable military presence and keep 20,000 troops in country, and left Iraq to its own devices and the tender mercies of Iran. In doing so, he betrayed every American and Iraqi who gave his life to create a free Iraq and keep it out of the clutches of the terrorists.

Iraq is now a war zone dominated by the terrorist forces of the Islamic State, whose rise Obama’s policies fostered. Both his secretaries of state praised the animal Bashar Assad as a “reformer” and a man of “peace,” helping him to thwart his domestic opposition. The Islamic State was born out of the Syrian chaos that ensued.


Far worse was Obama’s open support for America’s mortal enemy, the Muslim Brotherhood, spawner of al-Qaeda and Hamas. During the “Arab Spring,” Obama essentially put America’s weight behind the legitimization of this murderous organization that had been outlawed for 40 years for its assassinations and conspiracies against the Egyptian regime. Secretary of State Clinton gave totally unfounded assurances to the world that the Brotherhood was ready to become part of the democratic process and give up its 90-year holy war against infidels, Jews in particular but also — and explicitly — America. During the Brotherhood’s brief tenure as the government in Egypt Obama gave these genocidal zealots more than a billion dollars in American aid and F-16 fighter-bombers that could easily reach Israel’s major population centers, which for 60 years the Brotherhood had sworn to destroy.

By his feckless interventions in the Middle East, and his tacit support for the chief organization of Islam’s terror war against the West, Obama has set the Middle East on fire. All the violence in the crescent from Gaza to Iraq, including Hamas’s genocidal war against Israel, has been encouraged by Obama’s support for the Brotherhood and hostility toward the Jewish state.

Characteristic of this encouragement was his illegal intervention in Libya, which violated every principle that Obama and the Democrats invoked to attack President Bush and undermine America’s war against the Saddam regime and the terrorists in Iraq. Thanks to Obama, Libya is now in the hands of the terrorists and thousands of Libyans are fleeing to Tunisia and Egypt. Thanks to Obama, the Christian communities of Iraq, which date back to the time of Christ, are being slaughtered.

Because of Obama’s aversion to America’s role as a keeper of international peace, the tyrant Putin has been able to swallow Crimea and threaten the rest of Ukraine. Since his election in 2009, Obama’s policies have been responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of people and will result in the deaths of tens of thousands more. Thanks to his efforts to destroy America’s borders, Americans may be included in this grim toll. Certainly, Americans are now threatened by terrorists as never before.

Where is the Republican opposition? Why are Republicans still treating Obama as though his were a normal presidency and not a national disgrace? Why are there no indictments of Obama for the carnage he has enabled?

ALL of it here:
Obama?s Treachery and Republican Silence | National Review Online

Go ahead.

Write your congressman.

Personally I'd LOVE to see you traitorous scumbags try an impeachment.

Do it.

 

[Peach]

The UK, Russia, Turkey, Iran, even France, all want ISIS stopped, those Americans that love terrorists more than US can go swimming, try very deep water.

 

[Kosh]

The UK, Russia, Turkey, Iran, even France, all want ISIS stopped, those Americans that love terrorists more than US can go swimming, try very deep water.

Well I guess Obama did not want to be up staged by the world leader Putin.

Target ISIS: First batch of Russian fighter jets arrives in Iraq
Published time: June 29, 2014
Target ISIS: First batch of Russian fighter jets arrives in Iraq ? RT News

More proof that Obama loves to lead from behind.

 

[francoHFW]

Obama was for DEMOCRACY in Egypt. He gave arms to the ARMY- THE BROTHERHOOD WAS NOWHERE NEED IT. ANYTHING THAT'S GONE WRONG IN iRAQ was Maliki's fault- Bush's moron. And thanks for the depression that makes all this chaos possible, hater dupes.