Obama Attacks ‘Climate Deniers’ For Wasting Time Debating ‘Fact’

[Pete7469]

Oh but there's a conspiracy ..... among ALL THOSE organizations and nations.

We can't come up with any science or evidence to prove it, but it's true 'cause weeping Glenn Beck said so ...

Why do you think the attempts by you mindless lemmings to spin skepticism of dogma as a "conspiracy theory" always fails?

Could it be that real science is founded on questioning dogma?

You ******* morons are the 13th century Catholic Church - an identical clone.

 

[bripat9643]

Well the fact that they were caught CHEATING AND CHERRY-PICKING DATA to begin with to reach the "conclusion" of global warming being man-made


ur a joke

This is where the rubber meets the road with their "science". Yet they will ignore that and request you prove that global warming isn't happening.....when they can't legitimately prove it is.

This is a link (you click it to read more, try not to pretend like I didn't share my source this time) ---> http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-spm.pdf


"Global atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide have increased markedly as a result of human activities since 1750 and now far exceed pre-industrial values determined from ice cores spanning many thousands of years
(see Figure SPM.1). The global increases in carbon dioxide concentration are due primarily to fossil fuel use and land use change, while those of methane and nitrous oxide are primarily due to agriculture."

Ok, time for you to tell us what is wrong with this particular study.

The IPCC has been caught lying too many times to count. Furthermore, that isn't a scientific paper. It's a policy statement put together by politicians and U.N. bureaucrats.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Where did you receive your degree in climatology?

Where did you receive your GED?

I'd love to hear more about your expert knowledge and insight.

I doubt you'd turn away from Rachel Maddow and Jon Stewart long enough to listen...

 

[ClosedCaption]

Sooooo ....what "real science" have you read that led you to the conclusion that AGW is not real again? You forgot to say

Well the fact that they were caught CHEATING AND CHERRY-PICKING DATA to begin with to reach the "conclusion" of global warming being man-made


ur a joke

This is where the rubber meets the road with their "science". Yet they will ignore that and request you prove that global warming isn't happening.....when they can't legitimately prove it is.

So what science are you using to say its not real? A finding from a tingle in your balls doesnt count.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Opinion "to" high and post quality.

Everyone makes typos, including you. Imagining attacking a typo as high wit is the act of a dullard.

No doubt you have the support of your fellow Westboro Warmist Cult members, though...

 

[KNB]

And what "real science" have you read that led you to the conclusion that AGW is not real?

That you ask such a question demonstrates that you don't even know what science is.

Pronouncements from priests and shamans is not science. Science is not "settled" because a shaman declares discovery and research out of bounds.

Science is not government grants to universities and multimillionaires like Michael Mann and Algore.

What you of the AGW cult are, is the Vatican, seeking out denier Galileos who speak heresy by questioning the holy truth as revealed by PacMan and other climate simulations.

Science is a methodology, the rigorous search for new truths. The moment some scoundrel utters "settled science," then one is not dealing with science.

The very notion of science is sullied by you frauds - you pervert the core of a methodology developed by great minds.

How many shaman voodoo witch-doctors work for NASA or the FAS?

 

[RDD_1210]

If bed wetters knew they were idiots, there wouldn't be an issue.

They might even be open to learning something.

I think a lot, if not most of the warmists realize how ******* stupid their claims are; they just don't care.

These are Communists; if chanting utterly stupid slogans on man made climate change ushers in an authoritarian, collectivist system, then that's fine with them.

The goal is collectivism - the means of achieving it is irrelevant.

I agree and I've alluded to that point myself.

The goal is the destruction of our industry. The left has been working to collapse the one country on earth that was established for the sake of liberating mankind from tyrannical government sociopaths, since their ilk became devoted to a collectivist planet.

They sure must have been butthurt when their beloved soviet union collapsed.

That is why the must be defeated in all their endeavors though, and the bullshit global warming scam is one of the fronts they're loosing on.

You forgot to use the term Bed Wetter.

Please revise and resubmit.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Its not skepticism when you flat out say its not true.

I see.

You have the revealed truth, and heretic (deniers) fail to accept it as the divinely inspired revelation from Gaia that you of the Westboro Warmist Cult declare it to be.

Thats a statement of fact that breaks down as soon as someone calls you on it and you cant explain.

The fact is that you frauds offend me. What you promote is the opposite of science, you demand rigid adherence to dogma.

You are simply the Vatican of the 13th century.

 

[RDD_1210]

Where did you receive your degree in climatology?

Where did you receive your GED?

I'd love to hear more about your expert knowledge and insight.

I doubt you'd turn away from Rachel Maddow and Jon Stewart long enough to listen...

So you have no degree in climatology? Is that what you're saying?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Sooooo ....what "real science" have you read that led you to the conclusion that AGW is not real again? You forgot to say

What you of the Westboro Warmist Cult cannot grasp is that I have no need to prove you wrong. Your grasp of logic is equivalent to your grasp of science, that is to say, non-existent.

Over the last 30 years, your cult has made thousands of failed predictions, engaged in rampant academic fraud. fabricated data, openly lied, faked results, engaged in systematic demagoguery and black balling of scientist who DARE speak against you..

The fact is that only an utter ******* moron would believe you (which is why bodecea truly believes) YOU don't believe you - you know you're a fraud, but you're pursuing a political agenda that is more important to you than integrity.

Since you've been clobbered on the fraud of global warming, you've retreated to "climate change," so the term AGW hardly makes sense anymore. Still, AGW is nothing more than a vehicle for the same old collectivist totalitarians to pursue the same old agenda of socialism and the revocation of civil liberty.

You're a bunch of frauds, exposed repeatedly.

 

[RDD_1210]

This is where the rubber meets the road with their "science". Yet they will ignore that and request you prove that global warming isn't happening.....when they can't legitimately prove it is.

This is a link (you click it to read more, try not to pretend like I didn't share my source this time) ---> http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-spm.pdf


"Global atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide have increased markedly as a result of human activities since 1750 and now far exceed pre-industrial values determined from ice cores spanning many thousands of years
(see Figure SPM.1). The global increases in carbon dioxide concentration are due primarily to fossil fuel use and land use change, while those of methane and nitrous oxide are primarily due to agriculture."

Ok, time for you to tell us what is wrong with this particular study.

The IPCC has been caught lying too many times to count. Furthermore, that isn't a scientific paper. It's a policy statement put together by politicians and U.N. bureaucrats.

It's a summary, which you obviously didn't bother reading. Trust me, the actual study is way over your head but would you like me to link to that so you can pretend to read that as well?

 

[HenryBHough]

Nah, Obama's not like Hitler.

Not at all.

right on

Hitler was a better man

And, of late, Hitler's been harmless.

 

[Uncensored2008]

So nothing. You've read nothing that has led you to your opinion. It's just a "gut feeling" that tells you it's all made up.

Thanks for clarifying.

After all, you of the Westboro Warmist Cult are such paragons of academic integrity, we all should accept your revealed truth without question, right comrade?

{The scientist behind the bogus claim in a Nobel Prize-winning UN report that Himalayan glaciers will have melted by 2035 last night admitted it was included purely to put political pressure on world leaders.

Dr Murari Lal also said he was well aware the statement, in the 2007 report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), did not rest on peer-reviewed scientific research.}

BREAKING NEWS: scientist admits IPCC used fake data to pressure policy makers | Watts Up With That?

Hey, just because you're proven liars and frauds is no reason for people to question you....

 

[KNB]

So nothing. You've read nothing that has led you to your opinion. It's just a "gut feeling" that tells you it's all made up.

Thanks for clarifying.

After all, you of the Westboro Warmist Cult are such paragons of academic integrity, we all should accept your revealed truth without question, right comrade?

{The scientist behind the bogus claim in a Nobel Prize-winning UN report that Himalayan glaciers will have melted by 2035 last night admitted it was included purely to put political pressure on world leaders.

Dr Murari Lal also said he was well aware the statement, in the 2007 report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), did not rest on peer-reviewed scientific research.}

BREAKING NEWS: scientist admits IPCC used fake data to pressure policy makers | Watts Up With That?

Hey, just because you're proven liars and frauds is no reason for people to question you....

WattsUpWithThat.com says that the Daily Mail says that one guy says that the Greenhouse Effect isn't real, so NASA and all of the other voodoo witch-doctor shaman scientists all over the world are obviously wrong.

It makes so much sense to Republicans.

 

[Uncensored2008]

How many shaman voodoo witch-doctors work for NASA or the FAS?

Proven fraud James Hansen makes the case.

{ A surreal scientific blunder last week raised a huge question mark about the temperature records that underpin the worldwide alarm over global warming. On Monday, Nasa's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), which is run by Al Gore's chief scientific ally, Dr James Hansen, and is one of four bodies responsible for monitoring global temperatures, announced that last month was the hottest October on record.

This was startling. Across the world there were reports of unseasonal snow and plummeting temperatures last month, from the American Great Plains to China, and from the Alps to New Zealand. China's official news agency reported that Tibet had suffered its "worst snowstorm ever". In the US, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration registered 63 local snowfall records and 115 lowest-ever temperatures for the month, and ranked it as only the 70th-warmest October in 114 years.}

Global Warming Hoaxer James Hansen Denounced as Fraud by Former Boss | Right Wing News

 

[Uncensored2008]

So you have no degree in climatology? Is that what you're saying?

So you have no GED? Is that what you're saying?

 

[HenryBHough]

Of course the climate is changing.

Always has; always will.

Could humans speed it up or slow it down?

Maybe marginally.

But effectively?

Just as effectively as if OKP were to stand at the shore and command the tide to halt in its tracks. Maybe he should try that at Anchorage, Alaska:

Where is the highest tide?

But He needs to stand His ground! No wimping out when the waves lap over His head. Without faith there is nothing.

 

[Uncensored2008]

And, of late, Hitler's been harmless.

Hitler became a better man in the bunker - after the trigger pull.

 

[Ropey]

97% of Climate Scientists agree with man made global warming

The overwhelming majority of industrialized nations are in consensus

The US is split among party lines with the Democrats agreeing with the Climate Scientists and the Republicans agreeing with the oil companies

Not really.....just the IPCC scientists who's paper's were cherry picked by the committee.

Overwhelmingly cherry picked.

 

[RDD_1210]

So nothing. You've read nothing that has led you to your opinion. It's just a "gut feeling" that tells you it's all made up.

Thanks for clarifying.

After all, you of the Westboro Warmist Cult are such paragons of academic integrity, we all should accept your revealed truth without question, right comrade?

{The scientist behind the bogus claim in a Nobel Prize-winning UN report that Himalayan glaciers will have melted by 2035 last night admitted it was included purely to put political pressure on world leaders.

Dr Murari Lal also said he was well aware the statement, in the 2007 report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), did not rest on peer-reviewed scientific research.}

BREAKING NEWS: scientist admits IPCC used fake data to pressure policy makers | Watts Up With That?

Hey, just because you're proven liars and frauds is no reason for people to question you....

So still nothing from you in terms of what scientific studies you have read that have formed your conclusion that this is all made up. Not a single study? How did you come to such a conclusion without a single study or piece of scientific data?