Well this can be readily solved...
Agnapostate, are you stating, as a fact, that you never implied, nor did you seek to encourage an inference that children should be allowed to engage in coitus at their own discretion, with whomever fell into their favor?
Answer that with a definitive yes or no and we'll examine the record of your posts... if what you declare to be factual is true, then you'll have a public vindication; if what you say is false; then you will be certified as a lying child ****** of the first order; an advocate of the normalization of sexual abnormality; a sexual deviant and a danger to children and whatever culture in which you are found at any given moment.
So what it is sis... Yay or nay?
The whole exercise shouldn't take long...
(Aggrevated-Prostate will now be struck with a severe reticence... a distinct lack of interests in this discussion... for what should be obvious reasons.)
This is a dumb post.
He clearly indicates that he debates the rationality of the standard definition of minority. In that context, your question doesn't make any sense, as you and he are obviously using different definitions of "childhood."
I am guessing based on the silly and childish (by either definition I would think) insistence on a "yay or nay" answer that you realize how silly your question is. If you hadn't realized it before (and that would make you pretty dim), you should now.
Ahh... yet another of those who have the AUDACITY TO HOPE... coming to advocate for the liberalizations of the standards which prohibit Adult/Child sex...
Ya see, there are more than one definition of a child... There's the tot, the toddler, the whelp... the crumb cruncher, the motorcycle engine... all the way up to the adult child...
Everyone is familiar with the adult child, RIGHT?
These are the children who otherwise possess the intellectual means of an adult; the experience which bears their adult perspective... and it's not fair to mischaracterize the position of the left. who OBVIOUSLY are only advocating that ADULT CHILDREN be considered suitable for coitus...
Everyone up to speed on that?
Ya see it's NOT enlightened to reject "SCIENCE" which would otherwise establish that CHILDREN are perfectly acceptable sexual partners... because SCIENCE is an incontestable authority... and 'everyone knows THAT...'
ROFL...


freakin' pervs...